Latest Thread
But this is never the Korkut chassis, like @Bmx98 mentioned.
Normally in a spec sheet for armored vehicles, you expect to see some info about armor rating.
Fucking hell that is one ugly vehicle. Only thing that front end is missing is a sticker that says "Put drone/atgm here!"Normally in a spec sheet for armored vehicles, you expect to see some info about armor rating.
Maybe this bad boy will get the wheeled YNZMA tender…
8X8 – T.W.C.V – Anzatsan Inc. | Defence
anzatsan.com
No, bro! Please! We shouldn't even joke about it.Normally in a spec sheet for armored vehicles, you expect to see some info about armor rating.
Maybe this bad boy will get the wheeled YNZMA tender…
8X8 – T.W.C.V – Anzatsan Inc. | Defence
anzatsan.com
Yes it isBut this is never the Korkut chassis, like @Bmx98 mentioned.
Any sources?Yes it is
Is this company part of MKE?Normally in a spec sheet for armored vehicles, you expect to see some info about armor rating.
Maybe this bad boy will get the wheeled YNZMA tender…
8X8 – T.W.C.V – Anzatsan Inc. | Defence
anzatsan.com
They have been working with MKE for quite a long time as a subcontractor, supplier of stuff but recently the board of Anzatsan has been through a change and following that, somewhat they started introducing armored vehicles through MKE and Military Factory. But they won't last long, likely ripping some good R&D budget (made available by MKE and Land Forces) for the time being until it is found out that they can't really make a whole product*.Is this company part of MKE?
"Korkut chassis" is ACV-AD, ACV 30 by its previous name. It's a big vehicle, up to 30 tons.Its based on Korkut chassis but with steel hull instead of aluminum
It has nothing to do with any company, they don't have the money rn the economy is very fragile they can't begin a multibillion dollar project that's not an emergency.
Decision to aquire more Patrol Vehicles and Weapon Carrier Vehicles for the Land Forces, yet still no decision on the YNZMA tender which was supposed to be decided last year....
Also nothing on NGIFV, guess we will see even more trash cans be modernized with their peashooters.
I can imagine we all know why a decision isn't being made as a unnamed company isn't doing too well
I disagree. Getting new IFVs should be a priority we cannot keep using M113 and its variants in an actual war, at least not on the frontlines. Cheap FPV drones with shaped charges, mines and grenades are hunting tanks out there, M113 is a death trap for our soldiers.that's not an emergency.
6 to 8 TFSA militants died when their ACV was hit by an rpg at close range in 2020. ACVs don't have any real armor. They are made out of aluminum, which burns like a volcano when ignited.that's not an emergency.
And i don't think it is that you-know-who three letter but company but some another company may pop out of nowhere and secure the deals through another three letter company, and not deliver a thing in 3 year.If we sell the politicians vehicles and let all the politicians do the talking "online" we could save money. Only reason to use TBMM is for voting in which case I suggest "they" hitch a ride with a taxi and contribute to the national economy.
TC can afford IFV and should even if it's 24-36 piece a year. It doesn't say anywhere that you have to pay the entire amount when you order.