an 60% enriched uranium be used to make a fission bomb? I thought 90% was needed.
for making nuclear bomb you need 2 thing 90%+ enrichment and x amount of radio active materials ( just letting you know its not just quality but also
quantity ) iranian make a deal back in obama's time that they would not enrich more then ,if my memories correct, 20% which is not enough for bomb also all the facilities had cameras which give live window into their facilities in exchange for sanction relief . since iran's oil was under sanction and saudi arabia took iran's share in oil market removing the sanctions was bad for Saudis hence MBS went to trump brought 120 billion dollars worth of weapons and trump end the deal
here is the problem enriching uranium to 60% is hard and take times but enriching them from 60% to 90%+ is easy and fast
last summer US and israel bomb iranian nuclear facilities their facilities were destroyed but according to iranian side they remove several kilos ( i dont remember whether it was in 10s of kilos or hunders of kilos ) of 60% enriched uranium before the bombing and disperse it all over the country so we dont know where they are now
remember when i told you its not just quality but also
quantity to make the bomb ?? iranian side agree on no stockpiling which means they would never have enough quantity of nuclear materials to make a bomb
also to make 1 bomb it wont change a thing they need somewhere between 10 o 20 bombs ! and as
prof john mearsheimer explained they will make a nuclear explosion underground to show they have a bomb then we will tell them that they dont have enough quantity of nuclear materials then they will make the second explosion underground to proof they have enough bomb then we will stop the attack. basically we are on ticking clock to stop them getting the bomb and i dont see any stratgy from US-Israeli side how they are going to stop the iranians ! they have no plan ! instead they are giving vietname style propaganda that we killed X amount of man here we drop Y amount of bomb there ! which is not an answer to the real danger that iranians are distracting US-Israelis via drones and missiles and probably making bomb right now and US-Israelis have no plan to stop them
none of this would have happened if US-Israelis accept the Oman negotiations
Who is the bigger risk in terms of a country using nuclear weapons for the first time since 1945 - Iran or Israel? Israel hates Iran and does not care what effect its actions have on the people of that country. Iran hates Israel and does not care what effect its actions have on the people of that country.
according to professor John Mearsheimer Israel's only option left is to drop nukes on iran. israel is running out of options the clock is ticking they have no plan to get the nuclear materials out actually they have no "Boots on the ground". all of their strategy was on decapitations plan which btw failed regime still on control their military functioning no one from region opened any back channel to US to take over iran like Venezuela. and iranian people didnt rise up to overthrow the regime and now iranian side is rushing to make the bomb !
my opinion is as soon as iranian's make the first underground nuclear explosion israelis will drop the nukes but iranian side by that time would have somewhere between 10-20 nukes but idk what would happen next
www.independent.co.uk
www.berlingske.dk
