Search results

We should really focus on missiles like Raytheons Peregrine missile. That missile if it became operational will be the game changer on air to air combat. 200km missiles like Meteors are good and all but you won't be hitting any fighter aircraft at that range. Ability to carry twice as much...

We most likely won't. Not at least the volume that we don't need F16's. Replacing our fleet will take long time even after we started serial production. Why would they want it? They are not in any rush and there is no reason for them. Most likely it won't. As far as we know, not yet.

Hisar-U renamed as Siper Block 1.

It is not help. If we are lucky we will learn what we lost to the UAE for this.

How about both? We can reduce the number of TF2000's to 4 and order 8 of theese. This way we can achive force increase and replace the Gabya's in more economic way. Also we wouldn't need to rush TF2000.

Most likely the total count. It is a very robust comparison.

Yes, too few guns. You need at least 3 to call a ship Italian.

I hope so. That project is an abomination. We need new vehicles, not try to upgrade vehicles that already reached their limit.

Current Israel? I thought that was the whole point of creating the state.

They already did.

We are developing a national engine. Hopefully it will be ready by the time the serial production begins. For now. They will most likely block the engines for serial production.

No, this is Dearsan's design. Tf-100 is a different project. (well it is a rumor really) I really wonder what TN thinks about it though.

I guess they are hoping that the Korean deal will be finalized by then. I guess it makes sense that preparing serial production line for the Korean powerpacks. Geting some experience and fixing the problems with the low level production might be beneficial. Or they might be trying to build...

Not like BMC did nothing. They destroyed one perfectly good Leo2a4 while trying to install Altay turret for upgrade.

I really think this project is much much more important than the ATAK 2 project if we prioritize the navalized version first.(like in the picture) Naval helicopters(especially likes of the Sea Hawk) is not the helicopters that you could buy easily and we will really need them in the future. Yes...

I am still hoping that they change the name as well. I am not sure they could pick an ugglier name.

Yes. Because according to your claims if i want to swim around some parts of Kas i would violate your maritime border and if i want to jump to the sea i would violate your airspace. And i kinda have a problem with that.

Not really. F35 always planned to be operated with MMU. Only difference is F35 should be the cheaper aircraft while the MMU will be the expensive one(hi-lo concept) In fact F35 being that expensive likely would altered the numbers that we buy even if we didn't kicked out of the project.

Why are you using lira for your expenses but not for the income? Isn't that bit dishonest?

As much as I hate to say this but this is a very good deal for Greece. Look how salty we became about it:D Yes Belhara's are expensive but they are very good ships.(at least on paper) I guess AUKUS deal may be more beneficial to Greece than Australia.(If not Greek Navy most likely would end up...