Search results

Sounds like a decision making, planning and general organizational problem.

AFAIK hamas tunnels were built by Israel during occupation and are like proper constructions. I don't think these tunnels use concrete and such

But more specifically from 14:40 You know its the company that built these right

Current Anka 3 is an early prototype, it is not the final design.

It would be taken out by a stinger is what

Gripen has F414. America wouldn't sell that to us. But F414 has 60KW electric output or so that i remember, which is on par with F16 so it can have a good radar and electronics for A2A, but alas, not gonna happen.

TAI is being used as a locomotive to acquire technology and capabilities for indigenization, it was many times expected to use local parts where it could readily buy existing products and faced delays as a result. But some of these setbacks prepared infrastructure for capabilities we have today...

Is US training them based on their experiences of vietnam? Oh boy

It should be our absolute priority to ensure that this doesn't happen again. Whatever means that may require.

Milimeter radars etc. Other types of radars, traps, tripwires, fences..

If all the equipment is useless in that weather then what can soldiers do? Like if cameras can't see, can they see? If it is an undefensible position then that's the wrong position, plan should be made accordingly and resources should be allocated accordingly. Regardless of the conditions, being...

It is logical that they would work at least in concept for future but meaningless to announce it.

3 engine config would completely change the entire gearbox and transmission, which is basically building a new helicopter.

They should give them custom phones: camera, messaging and gps are important, but software should be restricted and encrypted. We hear things like soldiers sharing data through whatsapp for operations instead of military radios.

I expect Gökbey to be their best seller

CENK is said to be roughly 3 times that of Smart S

How many targets can Akrep follow though? Granted, with 16 missiles You can't engage too many targets anyways. But if it gets 64 Sapan Blok 2 it may be more relevant

If its 30 rpm and if maximum steering angle of a transceiver module is 120 degrees, you still have 1.333 second of a target being in blind spot of CENK. Although important to note is Advent should share data between ships so them so working in groups may cover for each others' blind spots

Apparently this also has 60 rpm rotation speed, for Smart-S MK2 that's 27 rpm in air defence mode. This should reduce the duration of blind spots significantly. Cenk-S is listed at 30 rpm, don't know if that is its maximum or regular mode.

The difference here is if engine is connected to a mechanical gearbox, then the energy is transferred mechanically and if the turbine has an alternator it might provide a fraction of its power to ships grid, but ship likely uses other dedicated generators for main electricity generation. If you...