Search results

This is a good point. Yes, higher RPF requries higher processing power. But can't they use off the shelf chips? Even low cost old APG-80 developed in 2002 can increase RPF up to 200kHz, according to the paper I read. Anyway, you are probably right. On a side note, if we are not using the...

I just used the calculator. It's a good one. I see in your calculation you assumed pulse repetition frequency to be at 100kHz. Which isn't given in the inforgraphic. Afaik, N036 Belka is liquid cooled. Hence it shouldn't be restricted to 100kHz PRF. If we increase the PRF to 300kHz while keeping...

Lol, no. I do know what I am talking about. And you don't need to highlight the areas. I do know and understand all of those criteria. Right now I am outside and on my phone. I will use this Excel file when I get to my PC. But that's irrelevant. Your result sheet shows 133km for 3m² RCS...

Bro, the chart you shared only demonstrate my calculation. Considering everything remains same, (transmission power, dwell time, duty cycle/pulse repetition frequency,) if an AESA has 226km against 3m2 target with PD=90% like and then it will have 170+km range against 1m2 target with PD=90%. (As...

How is my calculation wrong? Could you show the math? It would be easier for me to catch the fault. This is the formula. No exceptions. See your results and my results are same if we use the 100km against 1m2 RCS target as reference. Sorry, can't download it.

It's the fourth root formula. https://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/algebra/fourthroots.php Let's say, If you detect 1m2 RCS target at 100km, then you will detect a 0.1m2 RCS target at 56km. And a 0.01m2 RCS target at 31km, a 0.001m2 RCS target at 18km and so on.

I think @Nilgiri was making a point on how he felt about Western MSM in general. (Which I still disagree with. I hold it to a higher standard than he does) Probably not personally calling Jon Oliver 'lib city Karen' or something. Anyway, he will come around later tonight.

I actually watched this episode. It was more or less accurate IMO.

I wish to understand what are you saying. It's not clear. Could you elaborate more?

How did you calculate? Given the assumptions here My rough calculation for frontal aperture suggests– *255km range with PD=50% against 1m2 RCS target. *170km+ range with PD=90% against 1m2 RCS target.

Sperate program. Seperate story.

Where did you get the numbers?

What have they done to Kuzgun series? I was really counting on it for TB-3. Hoping that with Kuzgun TJ it would gain mini anti-ship capability.

What do you mean? Are you talking about the duct? Why?

@Kartal1 they got fed up with your criticism. So, they decided to make it even lighter just to own you.🤣

MTOW is half, payload is one third. Why would it compromise stealth?

No, it has a tandem warhead. Design to penetrate deep into heavy armor. Not to blow up. The small whole you see, it has gone through all the way to the other side of the launcher.

Ghost bat is not KE's future competition. Different class I would even say.

Those are L band.

I didn't see any US response mentioned in the video.