Search results

You made a end user agreement for only using it with F16 probably only with American weapons. But when it comes to design a fighter other level difficulties arise. Like the radar a sensetive technology what they don't want to share with you. Americans allows you when you buy ther weapoins:).

But when it comes to SK they don't care, as i mentioned the reason why they didn't gived the LINK-16 is because of Indonesia.

Thats a tactival DATA-LINK, the reason why LM didn't provide you with LINK-16 is because of Indonesian particpation. Link-16 is only for NATO members avaible, it is like France selling frigatte for Egyptian navy with out LINK systems, they have the monkey version.

Thats a single arm design, whats wrong with that? If they have calculated and they certainly about it nothing wrong.

Thats a good news....

you are looking to the wrong picture.. Ooo now i understand the one on the left is ada class and the right is I class...:)

Doesn't the radar look like SMART-S radar?

Under the barrel ther is 14 canister for missiles... :)

Test footage KE...

love story is coming to a end.

What kind EOTS will KE use?

Lesson to be learned from the NH90 program, and how can a single seahawk like that expensive? I asume we want to navalize our helicopter T-929.

Indeed, maybe wheb TUSAS come with stronger and lighter engine, or Aselsan with lighter flir then Wescam. Ther are things that can bet better on the TB2.

hybride seeker what Roketsan is working on, RF and IIR seeker i think.

They will go further with upgrading the old engine. https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2023/03/air-force-abandons-new-f-35-engine-favor-upgrades/383890/

Glorious country, they are in war and they have cooking program making TB2 dishes... :LOL:

So you are blindly accepting what they are saying? Did you asked proof or source from them?

And 20 time expensiver then TB3...

Nice interview...

No radar can look underwater...