Search results

It would have been good idea, if the Brits hadn't caused the first partition of Bengal in 1905. Please see my post above. Even after that it could have still been a good idea and significantly less loss of human lives that Bengal had experienced in 1947 and again in 1971.

Sorry for the extra delayed response dada, been busy with life last few weeks. Hope you are doing well. Looks like the discussion has taken a different tangent, but I will go back to my initial position of why there should have been 3 (or even more) instead of 2 nations in 1947, with United...

There was a movement for ethnocentric division in Bengal, but it died down. We can discuss about it in a different thread.

Sorry for going off-topic, Re - two nations theory in 1947. Three State (with United Bengal) solution would have been the correct choice in my opinion, in line with AK Fazlul Haque's vision. Too bad it didn't come to fruition then. Had it been the case, perhaps there would have been no bloodshed...

Israel's disinformation campaign: Still no evidence of Israeli gov’t allegations

US announces visa bans after warning Israel on West Bank settler violence

Erdogan - "Nethanyahu is gambling with entire region's future"

LeonBlack08 Don't recall you trolling me, I never take it seriously anyway. Besides you are quite harmless, as long as the thread is not derailed, it's all good.

Another refugee from PDF. Been with different defence forums but primarily with PDF for 15+ years. Not a professional, just an enthusiast.