It's been circumcised! "Sünnet edilimiş"
Latest Thread
It's been circumcised! "Sünnet edilimiş"
That's actually the general idea with the CCA program of the NGAD project.instead of building a laser into the fighter, why not build a cheap drone with a laser to act as a bodyguard for the fighter?
Weaker the laser longer it takes to melt the missile casing protecting the warhead. Also distances get shorter. You need a few hundred feet to not catch shrapnel from Russian warheads especially. America prefers hit to kill. Power is the main problem. Kaan has plenty both for cooling and firing. Most single engine jets don't.Will a 6th gen version of the KAAN be something like the X-44 Manta?
all this talk about laser weapons reminded me of Eren Drone.
instead of building a laser into the fighter, why not build a cheap drone with a laser to act as a bodyguard for the fighter?
Having a laser on the fighter may compromise the fighter's stealth and use too much power from the fighter.
Guys, I would like to inquire about the software developed in order to operate KAAN; in particular, the company which developed it, as some state that it is French Dassault while others state that it is Turkish Havelsan and Aslesan
Which is correct?
From open sources, job listings give a good idea as well, but there aren't any open right now:I remember being told that it was TÜBİTAK BİLGEM that did the software work.
Software Technologies Research Institute (YTE)
BİLGEM - Informatics and Information Security Advanced Technologies Research Center - TÜBİTAK BİLGEM
TÜBİTAK BİLGEM aims to become an R&D center that shapes the future by making our country a reference point and to direct the science and technology of the future.bilgem.tubitak.gov.tr
some of the avionics are made by Tübitak BİLGEM btw, huge props to them because they are developing the ICP and have contributed to the first flight with many subsystems, most notable being the FCCFrom open sources, job listings give a good idea as well, but there aren't any open right now:
CAD/CAM: Dassault CATIA & Siemens NX
Engineering Simulation: Ansys and in-house tools
OS: TÜBİTAK BİLGEM (GzİS)
Avionics: ASELSAN
Training Sim: HAVELSAN
I think flight control algorithms are in-house, running on Bilgem computers and OS.
As for the value of CATIA and NX, I know most aerospace engineers are taught to use them. They're very mature, but there are newer tools like PTC Creo (which even Lockheed Martin is starting to adopt). There's also an excellent Russian alternative by ASCON called KOMPAS-3D. The people that develop it literally wrote the textbook on Geometric Modeling. They're no joke. So options abound---but we have the industry standard, so no need to consider the alternatives. Haters be damned.
I love this CEO of TAI Temel Kotil , how he speaks and explain is super , Turkiye should make him Hero of RepublicKotil: We built the Hürjet to accelerate the Kaan project. We are working on the 6th generation through KAAN.
Perhaps one of the most important evaluation mistakes we have made is that we are referring to the traditional project development models of the western aviation industry. Normally, there should be 10-15 year intervals between these systems, but at TAI, the development of successors and predecessors are built on top of each other simultaneously.
This article also mentions how MAM will handle the canopy. Full translation:Milli Muharip Uçağı KAAN, İlk Uçuşunu Gerçekleştirdi | TÜBİTAK | Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
T.C. Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı'nın ilgili kuruluşudur.tubitak.gov.tr
Why? Its a disadvantage in manoeuvrbility.without vertical stabilizers
yeah. it's only $350(?) millions a pop. who wouldn't buy it(that assumes it's available for export)?6th Gen will probably come with
Advanced propulsion, variable bypass design, and CMC turbine blades
Galium oxide radars
Wideband RF and IR stealth
Advanced networking (LEO SAT constellation), data fusion, and MUM-T
Aerodynamic design without vertical stabilizers
Increased power production (1MW)
High-powered laser.
Real 6th-gen fighters will most likely come with these features meanwhile there will be 5.5th-gen fighters that will have some of them.
The lack of vertical stabilizers lowers the RCS of the aircraft. Maneuverability will be less important in the future.Why? Its a disadvantage in manoeuvrbility.
Engaging incoming missiles are still a threat. I would not omitting that. Just reduce the size.The lack of vertical stabilizers lowers the RCS of the aircraft. Maneuverability will be less important in the future.
Yes I knew about that part bur
So I didn't get stuck on that. I'm talking about geometry which Nilgiri explained.
Basically, the spine is a big bigger than similar aircraft?
The glas is not the problem as it is teansparent to radio waves. The problem is what's behind the glas, which is the cockpit. The cockpit bieng made out of flat surfaces in straight angles will act like a retro-reflect in essence. All aircrafts have this problem.
What is normally done is to coate the canopy with a transparent conductive film such that the shape of the canopy reflects away the incoming radio wave. The most common such material is indium tin oxide. You see these material even on commercial aircrafts but mainly for de-icing of cockpit windows.