Indonesia Indonesian Navy, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Laut (TNI-AL)

Madokafc

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
5,903
Reactions
4 10,020
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
I dont understand why our navy didn't buy this plane for ASW capability. We had a lot this thing on AL and AU but none of them being ASW role, even 1 plane

Because they had limited space caused by the existence of ramp door in the rear. For MPA or MSA roles they are okay, but for ASW hunting roles with the need to carry sonobuoy and other stuff the platform are not giving much space compared to conventional carrier design like ATR 72 or the Boeing
 

KanalKiri

Active member
Messages
48
Reactions
19
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Because they had limited space caused by the existence of ramp door in the rear. For MPA or MSA roles they are okay, but for ASW hunting roles with the need to carry sonobuoy and other stuff the platform are not giving much space compared to conventional carrier design like ATR 72 or the Boeing
How bout this plane? Turk CN235ASW
 

Attachments

  • Marco Papa.jpg
    Marco Papa.jpg
    246.7 KB · Views: 58

Parry Brima

Contributor
Messages
982
Reactions
1 1,057
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Small warships for Ukraine to be built in Scotland

A total of eight FIAC will be built for Ukraine will be based on a modified and updated 50-metre Protector design (P50-U).

It will likely feature a small-medium calibre main gun, 8 canister-launched anti-ship missiles and a lightweight surface to air missile system.

Nice to have 8 canisters SSM + SRSAM in 50 metres ship. Our KCR60 only has about 4 cans of SSM (and without any SAM), no?

SMALL-WARSHIP-FRO-UKRAINE-TO-BE-BUILT-IN-SCOTLAND.jpg
 

wekiweko

Committed member
Messages
167
Reactions
188
Nation of residence
Barbados
Nation of origin
Barbados
any news on when those BTOs will have their VLS ready for operational use again?
 

Umigami

Experienced member
Moderator
Indonesia Moderator
Messages
6,008
Reactions
5 4,856
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Small warships for Ukraine to be built in Scotland

As part of the Ukrainian Naval Capabilities Enhancement Programme (UNCEP) agreement signed with the UK government in October 2020, Babcock will build at least one, probably two Fast Inshore Attack Craft (FIAC) for Ukraine at their Rosyth facility. Here we look at this programme and Babcock’s other moves in the naval export market.

Fast attack
We first reported in September 2020 that the UK government had agreed to assist Ukraine in regenerating its navy. Initial rumours suggested that FIAC based on the Vosper Thornycroft-designed Barzan class vessels could be built in the UK, possibly at the Appledore shipyard (now owned by Harland and Wolff). The UNCEP subsequently appointed Babcock as the designated prime industrial partner for Ukraine and they will bring in SMEs to contribute as needed.

Industry sources suggested that BAE Systems, who had inherited the IP for the Barzan design, was willing to donate it on an ‘as seen only’ basis to other UK shipbuilders. However, Babcock assessed the Barzan as unsuitable, not least due to the drawbacks of its aluminium hull. A former Babcock subsidiary, FBM Marine (acquired in 2000) had a portfolio of small-medium size fast patrol ship designs under the ‘Protector’ brand developed in the late 1990s. A total of eight FIAC will be built for Ukraine will be based on a modified and updated 50-metre Protector design (P50-U).

UNCEP is based on UK export finance in the form of a loan to the Ukrainian government and will include British-made equipment where possible and Ukrainian and other foreign content as required. The precise weapon and sensor fit has yet to be determined but P50-U will be heavily armed for her size, intended to provide a short-range asymmetric deterrent to the much larger warships of Ukraine’s threatening neighbour. It will likely feature a small-medium calibre main gun, 8 canister-launched anti-ship missiles and a lightweight surface to air missile system.


P50U-Fast-Missile-Craft.jpg

(Image: Babcock)

More work for Rosyth
The lead ship of the P50-U FIACs will be built at Babcock Rosyth facility in the Syncrolift Hall (Building 18 – also known as the Sandown Minehunter Refit Facility) adjacent to the newly erected Type 31 shipbuilding hall. This will allow the project to be de-risked before the remaining 6 or 7 vessels are built In Ukraine.

The automated robotic panel line which has been installed as part of the investment for the Type 31 programme will also be used in the project and the craft will be assembled in pre-outfitted sections. The existing infrastructure in the Hall including overhead gantry cranes can readily support modular construction of what will probably be 500-600 tonne vessels. The syncrolift can also be used to lower the completed hull into the water.


Besides the FIAC project, Babcock also has the contract to improve naval shore facilities in Ukraine and refurbish two decommissioned RN minehunters (ex-HMS Ramsey and Blyth) before their transfer to the Ukrainian navy. The MCMVs will receive upgrades to their predominantly UK equipment fit in Rosyth before being handed over to their new owners. This is a similar package to the three ex-RN Sandown Class MCMV sold to Estonia (2007-8) and refurbished before handover, the three ships were also recently refitted and upgraded in Rosyth.

Arrowhead-140 goes global
Slightly overshadowed by the AUKUS submarine deal, on 16th December at DSEI, Babcock celebrated its first export success with Arrowhead-140. Indonesia formally signed a deal to license the design for two frigates to be constructed by PT PAL in Surabaya. The licensing deal is relatively modest but the real financial value for Babcock will be in the through-life support contract and some UK manufactured content in the ships.

Babcock pay a small royalty to OMT, the Danish company that designed the original Iver Huitfeldt class frigate that the Arrowhead-140 is based on. John Howie, Babcock’s Chief Corporate Affairs Officer told Navy Lookout that “the Danish have been enthusiastic and helpful in supporting the export effort”. Arrowhead is not just ‘Huitfeldt plus’ and there have been significant modifications to meet RN standards, make use of British components and a large contribution from Thales UK.

Arrowhead 140 is also a contender for the Polish frigate requirement and Babcock believe their competitive advantage lies in the size and flexibility of the platform as the Poles seek a more heavily armed ship than Type 31.

Arrowhead was a late entry into the Hellenic navy’s frigate competition which is a multi-faceted project as the Greeks seek a partner to provide more than just warships. There are four aspects to their requirements. The central pillar is a call for 4 frigates to be built in-country and there is strong competition from Europe and the US but the low price point of Arrowhead may be a big advantage. In the interim, their Hydra class MEKO frigates need to be refurbished and Babcock already has experience with these platforms, working on the Australian MEKO frigates. The Greeks also want help to rebuild their warship and commercial shipbuilding and repair capacity. Greeks interests own a quarter of the world’s merchant ships and the regeneration and a partnership in domestic yards has great revenue potential in the long term.

Finally, the Hellenic Navy has an urgent requirement for ‘interim’ frigates. Sadly for the UK, the cupboard is rather bare with just 2 possible candidates. HMS Montrose will return to the UK in 2022 after 3 intense years in the Gulf to be decommissioned. She has previously undergone LIFEX refit and Babcock Devonport would be well placed to refit her for further service. HMS Monmouth has been stripped of equipment is in a very poor material state, currently in the hands of DRSO in Portsmouth awaiting her fate. Whether Greece would be willing to pay for her to undergo a major refit that would probably cost at least £50M and take 2 years is doubtful. One remote possibility is that Monmouth’s refit could be done in Greece with Babcock assitance and used as a ‘pathfinder project’ to regenerate local skills.


While the French are terribly upset about the cancellation of their Attack-class submarine contract with Australia, it is worth noting that UK naval exports had almost become extinct in the 21st century. State-subsidised shipyards in France and other European companies have enjoyed a sustained run of successes in competitions, building warships where Britain was mostly not even a contender.

In the last two decades, the paltry total of new warships built in Britain for overseas customers comprises 4 OPVs for the Irish Navy (2018), 3 OPVs for Brazil (2013), 3 Khareef-class corvettes for Oman (2011) and 3 light frigates for Brunei (2002). The export of the Type 26 design to Australia and Canada was the start of a revival and UK industry will benefit considerably from supplying equipment for the vessels even being built overseas. All three navies will also benefit from economies of scale in purchasing equipment, commonality when operating together and shared experience and training opportunities. Further successes in licensing the Arrowhead design to other navies would have similar advantages.

Small warships for Ukraine to be built in Scotland | Navy Lookout
So other than PAL , Batamec also get some participation in Arrowhead 140 construction .

"Jakarta, September 23, 2021 --- The Indonesian Navy is strengthening the Main Weapon System Tool (Alutsista) by building a frigate type ship. PT. PAL Indonesia cooperates with Babcock England in the design of the Frigate Arrowhead 140, while for production activities it will cooperate with PT. Batamec. The construction of this frigate type ship was marked by the inauguration of the Project Officer and Commander of the Task Force (Dansatgas) for the construction of frigate ships by the Head of the Navy Procurement Service (Kadisadal) First Admiral of the TNI, Maman Rohman, ST, M.Han at Wisma Elang Laut, Menteng, Central Jakarta. . Thursday (23/09)."

So PT PAL will handle design and making some module but Assembly will be Batamec ?
 

R4duga

Experienced member
Messages
1,670
Reactions
2 2,367
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
So PT PAL will handle design and making some module but Assembly will be Batamec ?
perhaps they will split the work/construction half / half for certain ship module , like (PAL Will handle middle hull section and bow section , batamec will handle the stern and superstructure, mast etc.)
 

Umigami

Experienced member
Moderator
Indonesia Moderator
Messages
6,008
Reactions
5 4,856
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
They're keep talking about illegal fishing. Are they really gonna ignore chinese survey vessel incursions on our ZEE?
 

Var Dracon

Well-known member
Messages
446
Reactions
1 473
Nation of residence
Indonesia
perhaps they will split the work/construction half / half for certain ship module , like (PAL Will handle middle hull section and bow section , batamec will handle the stern and superstructure, mast etc.)
Do Batamec already have the tools and requirements module-based ship? If their equipment were different, it could lead to size difference and may lead to flawed module. And what about the experience? Do Batamec already produced modular ship, thus having enough experience? If this was their first, it may lead to delay if anything goes wrong
 

R4duga

Experienced member
Messages
1,670
Reactions
2 2,367
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Do Batamec already have the tools and requirements module-based ship? If their equipment were different, it could lead to size difference and may lead to flawed module. And what about the experience? Do Batamec already produced modular ship, thus having enough experience? If this was their first, it may lead to delay if anything goes wrong
as long as there is supervisory from babcock and OMT i guess it's fine.
 

satria

Contributor
Indonesia Correspondent
Messages
708
Reactions
7 1,100
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia

Indonesia holds offset talks with Abeking & Rasmussen for new hydrographic ship


The meeting was headed by Director General of Defense Potential, Brigadier General Aribowo Teguh Santoso, while Abeking & Rasmussen officials were accompanied by representatives from the company's local agent PT Agrapana Nugraha Katara.

Also present during the meeting were representatives from Indonesian shipbuilders, PT Palindo Marine, PT Batamec, and PT Bandar Abadi, state-owned electronics company PT Len, and the deans of the machining and electro-informatics faculties at the Bandung Institute of Technology.

The source that provided Janes

 

Van Kravchenko

Contributor
Indonesia Correspondent
Messages
1,285
Reactions
2 872
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia

Indonesia holds offset talks with Abeking & Rasmussen for new hydrographic ship


The meeting was headed by Director General of Defense Potential, Brigadier General Aribowo Teguh Santoso, while Abeking & Rasmussen officials were accompanied by representatives from the company's local agent PT Agrapana Nugraha Katara.

Also present during the meeting were representatives from Indonesian shipbuilders, PT Palindo Marine, PT Batamec, and PT Bandar Abadi, state-owned electronics company PT Len, and the deans of the machining and electro-informatics faculties at the Bandung Institute of Technology.

The source that provided Janes
US$ 150 million dollar has been approved to pay the ship via foreign loan. This ship expected to act as Submarine rescue vessel beside her main job as hydrooceanograph.


Well, if somebody insisted the submarine rescue vessel will be derived from US$ 600 million for secondhand submarine project.

I think it safe to say "do not take masseur and students leak so deep"
 

Van Kravchenko

Contributor
Indonesia Correspondent
Messages
1,285
Reactions
2 872
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Do Batamec already have the tools and requirements module-based ship? If their equipment were different, it could lead to size difference and may lead to flawed module. And what about the experience? Do Batamec already produced modular ship, thus having enough experience? If this was their first, it may lead to delay if anything goes wrong
No clue, but hey they also invited in hydrooceanography vessel from abeking & rasmussen study tour tho
 
Top Bottom