TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

Heartbang

Experienced member
Messages
2,556
Reactions
8 3,972
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Kemankeş should be modified with RATO and engine sped up to EO track slow moving air targets just like Iran's ground launched Missile 358 that shot down MQ9-Reaper in Yemen.
Modifying Kemankeş into a loitering anti-air missile would be inefficient. The amount of mods you need would be too much.

Might as well develop something brand new, just for that purpose.
 

Stimpy75

Committed member
Türkiye Correspondent
Messages
222
Reactions
4 928
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
cheapest AD system? and cheapest ammunition? do you know the price tags of those or where do you pull these infos from? ......my guess these are more like Ferrari prices and NOT FIAT prices!
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,801
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Chinese JRVG-1 76mm self-propelled gun system

View attachment 19926

The new version of the domestic 76mm anti-aircraft gun adopts the principle of revolving, which can fire programmable ammunition​


View attachment 19927

The development ofdomestic artillery in recent years has mainly shown three development trends: First, the caliber is biased towards 155mm and 122mm large calibers; the second is biased towards self-propelled, mainly wheeled chassis; third, the focus is on vigorous development Smart ammunition for artillery. This is an important direction for the development of domestic artillery, but in addition to this direction, domestic artillery also shows some small characteristics, that is, the improvement of shipborne artillery into land artillery. The most typical example is the improvement of the domestic 730 naval gun to the Lushi 2000, and the 76 mm naval gun to the 76 mm anti-aircraft artillery. Today, we will focus on the situation of this new type of domestically produced 76mm anti-aircraft gun.

Judging from the current public reports, the self-propelled anti-aircraft artillery system improved from the 76mm naval gun is officially called the JRVG-1 76mm self-propelled air defense artillery system. On the whole, it mainly has the following three technical characteristics:
First, it uses the working principle of revolving. In order to increase the rate of fire of conventional artillery, the most commonly used technologies currently mainly have three aspects: one is the principle of tube revolving, such as the domestic 1130 naval gun; The chamber revolves around the barrel. The familiar revolver is actually based on this principle, but the revolver is a gadget, and the revolver is a big one; the third is the chain principle, and the typical representative is Wuzhi 10 Of 23 chain guns.
View attachment 19928

second is that it uses an unmanned turret. The use of unmanned turrets for tanks, armored vehicles and artillery is a relatively cutting-edge technology development trend. At present, there are not many countries that master this technology, and the actual application of mature products is rare. Artillery systems using unmanned turrets generally have fully automatic bomb supply capabilities and advanced electronic equipment for the gun.

third is that it is equipped with three types of ammunition: programmable smart ammunition, high-explosive ammunition, and semi-armor-piercing ammunition. Among the above-mentioned three types of artillery ammunition, programmable intelligent ammunition has the most advanced technology and the best combat performance, especially in the accuracy of intercepting targets in the air. With regard to the development of programmable intelligent ammunition for artillery, few countries in the world are capable of developing such ammunition. (Author's signature: 1130 naval gun)
View attachment 19929

View attachment 19930
View attachment 19931
View attachment 19932
Here is the Chinese cheapest solution
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
936
Reactions
13 1,533
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
In last AMS podcast I've heard we are still buying RPG 7 from abroad. I mean I think with its price RPG 7 will still be relevant alongside other grenade and missile launchers, because ATGM are far more expensive, but seriously, that's something we could easily make a slightly more modern alternative and it would be a significant export item as well.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,408
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,909
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
In last AMS podcast I've heard we are still buying RPG 7 from abroad. I mean I think with its price RPG 7 will still be relevant alongside other grenade and missile launchers, because ATGM are far more expensive, but seriously, that's something we could easily make a slightly more modern alternative and it would be a significant export item as well.
MKE does produce RPG warheads and it is such a simple weapon that there is nothing much you can modernise about it. And we don't actually use RPG-7 a lot, as far as I know, we use HAR-66 (which is our version of M72 LAW) and MKE also produces rocket and launchers for those, have done so for a very long time.

Also, there is nothing wrong with buying stuff from abroad during peace time, as long as you have the capability to increase production if it becomes necessary. From propellants to explosives and materials for shells themselves, all of it takes raw resources and production lines. As we have limited industrial capacity and resources for military production and we have to prioritise them properly. We don't really need to use some of those to produce more RPGs when we can easily buy them, which might even be cheaper than producing them ourselves since everyone and their nans produce RPG-7 locally.
 

Quasar

Contributor
The Post Deleter
Messages
734
Reactions
51 3,280
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
In last AMS podcast I've heard we are still buying RPG 7 from abroad. I mean I think with its price RPG 7 will still be relevant alongside other grenade and missile launchers, because ATGM are far more expensive, but seriously, that's something we could easily make a slightly more modern alternative and it would be a significant export item as well.
last time guess we were buying some from Bulgaria ... should be with thermobaric warhead..??? @Kartal1 Picture of it should be somewhere here in Defencehub posted by Kartal

1699613978781.png


Edit: it was posted by @Combat-Master
 
Last edited:

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,801
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
RPG-7 is more popular in the world because terrorists could just reach Soviet weapons.
RPG-7 has terrible accuracy as the rocket propulsion is vulnerable from side winds.

I would prefer Recoiless gun rather than rocket propulsion.
Look at US and other modern Armies they use Swedish Carl Gustaf and AT-4.

There is a Turkish company that revealed copy of Carl Gustaf 84mm recoiless gun.

1699615620498.png



Unmanned Ground Vehicle mounted several recoiless rifle would be great.
 
Last edited:

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,408
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,909
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
RPG-7 is more popular in the world because terrorists could just reach Soviet weapons.
RPG-7 has terrible accuracy as the rocket propulsion is vulnerable from side winds.

I would prefer Recoiless gun rather than rocket propulsion.
Look at US and other modern Armies they use Swedish Carl Gustaf and AT-4.

There is a Turkish company that revealed copy of Carl Gustaf 84mm recoiless gun.

View attachment 62798


Unmanned Ground Vehicle mounted several recoiless rifle would be great.
I'd prefer it if we acquired recoilless rifles as well, but RPG-7 and HAR-66, which we use more often, cheaper very short range alternatives. In fact, we use it so much we even made an anti-personnel warhead for HAR-66, I don't know if any other users of M72 LAW has done that. I don't think the army is actually looking for another short range solutions other than what we already have and is focusing on medium to long range in anti-armour capabilities.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,247
Reactions
141 16,269
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Gokdogan, Bozdogan air to air missiles and Kuzgun missile family are set to join the inventory of Turkish Armed Forces in 2024.

Gokdogan being a medium range air to air missile was given a 100+ km range during a recent interview by then SSB president I Demir. According to Defence Turkey magazine the BVR missile Gokdogan, has a Dual Pulse engine as opposed to the Amraam aim 120 missile it will be replacing which has a boost sustain dual thrust engine.
WVR (Within Visual Range) Bozdogan air to air missile, has a given range of 25 km with high manoeuvrability and will replace Aim9x missiles we currently use. It is designed to be fitted on to KAAN when it is ready.
1699614679816.jpeg


Kuzgun missile family will bring high flexibility and interchangeability/inter usability to our armed forces.
1699616590437.jpeg



EDIT:
A small note to add that these a2a missiles were first introduced in 2017 Fair.
It will have taken 7 years for them to be in the inventory.
 
Last edited:

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
936
Reactions
13 1,533
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Gokdogan, Bozdogan air to air missiles and Kuzgun missile family are set to join the inventory of Turkish Armed Forces in 2024.

Gokdogan being a medium range air to air missile was given a 100+ km range during a recent interview by then SSB president I Demir. According to Defence Turkey magazine the BVR missile Gokdogan, has a Dual Pulse engine as opposed to the Amraam aim 120 missile it will be replacing which has a boost sustain dual thrust engine.
WVR (Within Visual Range) Bozdogan air to air missile, has a given range of 25 km with high manoeuvrability and will replace Aim9x missiles we currently use. It is designed to be fitted on to KAAN when it is ready.
View attachment 62797

Kuzgun missile family will bring high flexibility and interchangeability/inter usability to our armed forces.
View attachment 62800
Gökdoğan was first said to have 65km+ that’s good if it’s quoted at 100 now. Btw doesn’t dual pulse essentially activate near the terminal stage and give the missile a significant energy boost and manoeuvrability close to target, making no escape zone longer, essentially?
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,748
Reactions
94 9,070
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
Forgive me for being 'criminally' skeptical about Gokdogan MK1 having dual pulse motor. Although, defenceturkey is a reliable source, i need to hear it from Tubitak or see a visual demonstration like HISAR.
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,748
Reactions
94 9,070
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
Here is a rough calculation for Gokdogan's effective range.

I read in f16.net, the time it takes for a BVR missile to lose 25% of its velocity after burn out at supersonic speeds.

*Never @ > 100,000 m (~300,000 ft) ; in space
*150 seconds @ 24,000 m (~80,000 ft)

*70 seconds @ 18,000 m (~ 60,000 ft)

*25 seconds @ 12,000 m (~ 40,000 ft)

*10 seconds @ 6,000 m (~20,000 ft)

*5 seconds @ Sea Level



Now if Gokdogan is launched at supersonic speed it will achieve Mach 4+ near hypersonic speed.

Let's say a TurAF F16 flew up to 15,0000 meters and launched the Gokdogan at supersonic speed in a lofting trajectory. (To maximize the effective range)

1699620079728.png

You can see in this Gokdogan test firing video, the nose cone of the F16 is angled at 30-35 degrees upward w.r.t white skyline below.

So, in this case Gokodgan will cover roughly 10km in the boost phase before the rocket motor burns out.
And then it will likely to continue climbing upward in a lofting trajectory. Hence slowing down the velocity loss.

By the time it losses 25% of its velocity and descends to Mach 3, it will probably be 90-100km away or more you get an idea. For an accurate estimate you need to do the math) while still retaining roughly 30G Maneuverability.

Now that it will come down on the target from above in a lofting trajectory, it means, outmanoeuvring it would be relatively harder than if it were to come from any other angle.


On a side note- If above mentioned missile's velocity properties are correct, then it kind of explain, why USA isn't that bothered with not having the best BVR weapon or some countries despite having the chance to get Meteor for its Eurofighter fleet are still buying AIM-120D. (Germany recently requested to buy 969 AIM-120 C-8/D. Or Qatar bought AIM-120 with its Typhoon Trench 3A along meteor) That is probably because, when maximizing the Altitude and speed advantage of Eurofighter (or even better F-15EX with a maximum altitude of 20000m) and launched upward in a lofting trajectory, the effective range of AIM-120D and Meteor does not wildly differ as much as we previously thought.

However, Meteor (or any ducted rocket missile for that matter) will have game changing ability when launched at low altitude like 4000-6000 m where conventional missile losses 25% its velocity in 10 seconds or less. (Plus Meteor will always have superior end game maneuverability due to its multiple pulse motor hence also maximizing the kill probability)
 
Last edited:
E

Era_shield

Guest
RPG-7 is more popular in the world because terrorists could just reach Soviet weapons.
RPG-7 has terrible accuracy as the rocket propulsion is vulnerable from side winds.

I would prefer Recoiless gun rather than rocket propulsion.
Look at US and other modern Armies they use Swedish Carl Gustaf and AT-4.

There is a Turkish company that revealed copy of Carl Gustaf 84mm recoiless gun.

View attachment 62798


Unmanned Ground Vehicle mounted several recoiless rifle would be great.
I agree. Fun fact: RPG-7 rounds veer into crosswind, and they have a multi-phase non-ballistic trajectory. Anyone who reads a training manual for them will have a new respect for soldiers who can hit a target from a distance.
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,801
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I agree. Fun fact: RPG-7 rounds veer into crosswind, and they have a multi-phase non-ballistic trajectory. Anyone who reads a training manual for them will have a new respect for soldiers who can hit a target from a distance.
IMG_20231111_121421.jpg


BS:)

I would prefer LAW-66 over RPG-7 if i had to choose rockets.
Anyway Turkish Army should have domestic AT-4.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,342
Reactions
79 10,726
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
LAW is light, and this is a huge advantage for commando roles. RPG have one big advantage over it. At least 10 types of warheads for many roles.

Both however have abysmal track record against modern tanks. Turkish infantry is greatly lacking in single troop(tek er) anti tank capability. RPG and LAW are well past their design parameters. We may not be able to equip our mechanized squads with Javelin or Karaoks like Americans, but there has to be a some level between company level Milans and squad level Karaoks( which won’t happen for sure) that we can aim to reach.
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,748
Reactions
94 9,070
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
LAW is light, and this is a huge advantage for commando roles. RPG have one big advantage over it. At least 10 types of warheads for many roles.

Both however have abysmal track record against modern tanks. Turkish infantry is greatly lacking in single troop(tek er) anti tank capability. RPG and LAW are well past their design parameters. We may not be able to equip our mechanized squads with Javelin or Karaoks like Americans, but there has to be a some level between company level Milans and squad level Karaoks( which won’t happen for sure) that we can aim to reach.

Bro, even US army does not have squad level javelin. They have one weapon squad per platoon which is equipped with javelin. (While other three infantry squad in the platoon does not have javelin).

That is the exactly what are you looking for, I think. Between company and squad level, an anti tank team with each platoon.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,408
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,909
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
I guess we have to distinguish two issues

1-What we need for any future conflict against a conventional army i.e what we have to produce in meaningful quantites

2-What we are in need now!!! .

Since currently we are directly involved in a conflict with some mountain rats. Instead of lets say A-4, kara ok or carl gustaf, buying some low thec RPG rounds most probably thermobaric ones again lets say from Bulgaria or somewhere else has its logic. And it is safe to assume that the outcome against rats should be satisfactory for the Army
We don't really need to buy RPG munition though because, as I said before, we mostly use HAR-66 aka M72 LAW and MKE already makes an anti-personnel warhead for it and we use that.
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,801
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Guys forget about RPG-7, it's for monkeys attack. Terriblely İnaccurate.
Recoiless guns such as AT-4 and CG 84 has more velocity.

İf you need bunker busters, Need to do What Americans and Israel do!
1.00_00_33_09.still001.png



However we are living in the new era of drones. You don't need to sacrifice your troopers for attack.

There are lot of companies produce Drone mounted LAW-66.
This from US
images (4).jpeg

images (5).jpeg

This from Sweden. NAMMO which produces programmable ammunitions
images (6).jpeg


images (8).jpeg


This is from Ukraine
images (7).jpeg

images (9).jpeg

images (10).jpeg


Turkish Army has a load of RAH-66( LAW-66)
 
Last edited:

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,342
Reactions
79 10,726
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Bro, even US army does not have squad level javelin. They have one weapon squad per platoon which is equipped with javelin. (While other three infantry squad in the platoon does not have javelin).

That is the exactly what are you looking for, I think. Between company and squad level, an anti tank team with each platoon.
You are right in light infantry brigades. They have their own atgm squads as part of the platoon.

But if you look at Stryker BCTs and their 3 rifle companies each, each 3 rifle squad in one Stryker each have a single Javelin with few reloads. That’s 9 squads with 9 Javelins per company, which gives AT capability to smallest unit available. Each squad also get 2 riflemen with AT4s. Weapons squads in each rifle platoon carry MGs, not AT.

This is simply too expensive for anyone else but the Americans, yes. But in modern war grunts need all the help they can get against armor.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom