I think there is a hidden strategy behind the slow supply:
Don't make the bear feeling as looser.
You know i also thought this of this for a long time. In a similar manner to how the Pakistani's told the americans when arming the taliban against the soviets to do it in small incremental steps, basically to take the boiling frog approach. But to me when things like when 30 tanks go while they got 8k in storage, it just looks like their taking the piss.
Its like you got 30 of the most developed nations on earth, who could all give 2% of their equipment and this war would be over. But Ukrainians got to keep begging for shells when they could of had much better stuff by now.
I mean why would they, as everyday Americans face rising cost of living, their government are busy spending money (that the U.S doesn't have) for foreign countries like Ukraine and Israel.
In order for Ukraine to convince me they will win the war among any user here they will have to provide.Russian will eventually loose if support for Ukrainian continues.meanwhile zionist state and shia republic are destroying each other. once these three are out Türkiye will emerge as a world power. The number one player in the region.
Well, Russians are fighting for their empire despite not having indoor plumbing. If poverty would be the reason why people donāt want to fight for their country, Russia would have more problems to get soldiers than the West.
The reason is actually the total opposite of what you (and the author of the article you cite) state.
People in the West are not willing to fight because thier standard of living is so high that they canāt really understand the threat of poverty and occupation. It is also the fact that people feel it is unfair to go fighting while 99% of the population still lives like kings and queens.
It is much easier to mobilize the ultra-poor to fight than it is to mobilize the well off. For the ultra-poor, life in the army with guaranteed food would not even be that bad, and the risk of losing their life is not such a bad deal, since their life is miserable anyway. On the other hand, for people who live well, the risks are not worth taking, and the burden is much bigger, because they are not used to hardships.
So your argument is really wrong. The West has a problem with military recruitment because it has a very high standard of living, not because people are poor and homeless.
Russia being ultra-poor meant they use the poor part of Russian,such as Siberia or far east people to fight,not the Moscow and other rich city.But they don't. Russians actually rallied behind Putin.
One of the reasons why they fight is because they know the glory and reward for fighting eventually goes into their country's pocket. This is not the same with the average American Joe, who views that most of their country's good and greatness are being sent to countries abroad while they suffer.
If you look at the MAGA movements and their talking points, it's mainly about how great America and Americans will be if all their money is being kept inside the country. Real or perceived.
The Americans has always had a very high standard of living (compared to the rest of the world) but only now we're seeing this kind of lamenting
I don't understand this propaganda of Russia being ultra-poor, yes they're not the richest and have always been known as the poor man's empire, but ultra-poor? Russia's GDP per capita is $14,391, that higher than Malaysia ($13,315), Turkiye ($12,765), Argentina ($12,812), and the Dominican Republic where you reside ($11,774)
There are SOOOO many reasons why the West is having (and will continue having) problems with military recruitment. This is just one of the many reasons.
And most of it doesn't have any quick fix
But they don't. Russians actually rallied behind Putin.
One of the reasons why they fight is because they know the glory and reward for fighting eventually goes into their country's pocket. This is not the same with the average American Joe, who views that most of their country's good and greatness are being sent to countries abroad while they suffer.
If you look at the MAGA movements and their talking points, it's mainly about how great America and Americans will be if all their money is being kept inside the country. Real or perceived.
The Americans has always had a very high standard of living (compared to the rest of the world) but only now we're seeing this kind of lamenting
I don't understand this propaganda of Russia being ultra-poor, yes they're not the richest and have always been known as the poor man's empire, but ultra-poor? Russia's GDP per capita is $14,391, that higher than Malaysia ($13,315), Turkiye ($12,765), Argentina ($12,812), and the Dominican Republic where you reside ($11,774)
There are SOOOO many reasons why the West is having (and will continue having) problems with military recruitment. This is just one of the many reasons.
And most of it doesn't have any quick fix
Russia losing this war is an impossible dream and the idea of Zionists and the Shias destroying themselves won't happen .Russian will eventually loose if support for Ukrainian continues.meanwhile zionist state and Shia republic are destroying each other. once these three are out Türkiye will emerge as a world power. The number one player in the region.
No, they fight for money, their personal salary, not for the glory of their country. Russia recruits from the very poor regions where many people have no job or a very low income. For those people, the money earned in the military are significant and there is pressure from their families to get the military job. Poverty is the main factor.
The MAGA movement is just the most basic form of manipulation applied on the uneducated. It works in every country, not only in the US. You tell the uneducated: āHey, all these money spent on others, we could give it to youā and they will vote you and love you. This is how populism works.
They stopped the war in Vietnam for the same rasons. āItās not our war, not our business to defend other countriesā has been around since Vietnam.
Itās not about the countryās average, it is about Russia having very large parts of the country in extreme poverty. The army recruits mostly from the ultra-poor regions. In the wealthy parts of Russia (Moscow and St. Petersburg) you donāt see people so eager to join the army. Moscovites are more like Westerners, they just want to enjoy their good life.
This is not the only reason, but it is the main one. People who can earn a decent living without risking their lives and with little effort are not incentivized to join the military. Itās that simple.
If your theory is all about "Good life = not willing to sacrifice" then it doesn't explain why Americans in the 50s are so eager to join the war in Vietnam.Between 1945 and 1960, the gross national product more than doubled, growing from $200 billion to more than $500 billion, kicking off āthe Golden Age of American Capitalism.ā Much of this increase came from government spending: The construction of interstate highways and schools, the distribution of veteransā benefits and most of all the increase in military spendingāon goods like airplanes and new technologies like computersāall contributed to the decadeās economic growth. Rates of unemployment and inflation were low, and wages were high. Middle-class people had more money to spend than everāand, because the variety and availability of consumer goods expanded along with the economy, they also had more things to buy.
You need areas with extreme poverty in order to have a large pool of selection for the military. Thatās why people are so brave in Yemen or Afghanistan, because they are ultra poor, while the Saudis are ācowardsā as you call them, because they are very wealthy.
In the end, it all boils down to money. People with money donāt want to die needlessly for someone elseās war. Poor people on the other hand, they would risk their lives for money.
Berdychi has been confirmed as liberatedStill unconfirmed, take with a pinch of salt.
Ukrainian troops defending Semenovka and Berdychi is negotiating surrender.