Search results

India is big but we are moving faster in military technology.

Once we have everything conventional we should look into that too.

At that point we will probably be selling stuff rather than buying.

Imagine what happens in ten years when ongoing development projects come online; fifth position and even fourth position is possible.

Anka3 can do a good job at any of its incarnations as there is no existing capability in its class. It will share its class with Kızıelma when KE arrives.

And the beast

That's all we have for now, but even for the future to keep the cost down a cheap engine is good to have. Also considering exports the market, not everybody needs a top of the line product.

They are talking about humanoid robots. Another field some startups can go unicorn.

A few messages later I had actually detailed what I meant, so there is of course a point to having a navy but we can afford to send some of our fleet to ascort aircraft carriers surely.

You should be able to say more than just a couple of words.

If you can feed updated position information of the target into the missile like what happens when laserpointing then there is a good degree of likelyhood you can hit a moving target.

Why limit yourself, aim smaller.

It would be counterintitive to make a carrier Hürjet as we may very well be without engine supply. I would think a twin TF10k engine Hürjet and versions of KE both with single and twin engines with both TF10k and TF6k would be more viable. With possible single and twin TF35k engine planes...

By the time we get the AC we can get enough of every ship and weapon to go along with it, we have a minimum 7 years to it.

That goes beyond coastal. Thinking in the context of being able to reserve naval assets to join aircraft carrier groups the remaing assets will still be able to defend coastal waters. As a nation that can equip its entire arned forces at 95% indigenous level which we expect to achieve in 5-6...

Defending Turkish mainland we have land based platforms being made, so it is not necessary to rely on the Navy for coastal defence.

We are not China we need to move smarter rather than harder, LOL.

While Russia is the weakling it is now it is an excessive move by the Americans if they purely intend to go against Russia. Any force that stationes close to us is a force built against us. Make no mistake the US is behind every calamity that has beffalen on Türkiye.

The US is the one that pushes Greece to claim excessive coastal rights that will damage Turkish rights in the region, again amassing American forces in Thrace.

How about hydrocarbon rights in our EEZ? Amassing of terrorists at our southern borders and playing nation-making games. Promissed land and all.