Search results

ACV-15 modernization project

Prototype for a product already in production for a long time? I smell Aselsan! ;)

Hard to detect & nearly impossible to distinguish from a civilian speed-craft without visual confirmation

That number includes 5.56’s also

I know that’s around 40k

Price is not a top priority for an aero-engine. Performance and reliability are. Main logic here is to compress thin air of the high altitude which causes power drop in the current form. So, it had not to be in the current known form of a supercharger. P.S. I’m not an engineer.

How it is compared with Spear 3?

No hope! It’s classified.

Naming decision depends what the user want to call them as. There’s no rules over there. They can name a 800 t ship as frigate. But the international reporters call them after as very small corvette sized frigate

Bro, there’s significant structural difference on the front canard structure and placement. Due to easy manufacturing both missile in a single manufacturing line, it’s better to have same propulsion section. So I’m expecting structural change in Hisar-O+ IIR

Standard missile with the active seeker is SM-6 and operational but just in US Navy

Actually never will be the best in anything. Because of they’re designed as aero-mule.

I think it is the time for TEI to consider to add a supercharger to present TD222 setup. She has sequential twin turbo added as far as I know. The turbos are cheap and easy to install hence more popular. They speeds up exhaust removal. But they have lag problem (ie. Works in high rpm) Their gain...

Then building a new one will be easier and cheaper

How? There’s one seat in the chassis.

I’m expecting a naval variant (Catobar type) and a deep strike variant in the future.

It’s the place where the optics will be mounted

Remember the Mistral LHDs built for Russian Navy

Bro, I’m betting for a catobar variant of QE class. ;)

Lets see the broad bean hidden in your mouth?