Search results

Hey Joe , Hope you are doing fine , How is your health ? Be careful , be safe from covid :)

Never heard Russians or Europeans/French have any platform which is eqivalent to Growler

I dont think so , Attaturk was literal defenition of a secular leader , who set the bench mark of no religious interference in State affairs . The way he controlled clergy set a bench mark. Nehru was tilted towards one sect of society , the kind of HRD ministers he has appointed led to literal...

Such things are always reactionary and how you know the issues are one sided

Its pretty complex subject , you have to spend years in understanding evena specific region of India . History , culture , practises of Rajasthan are completely differtnt from Tamil Nadu . Similary , it goes for all different states every state has its own history , historical icons ...

Its not a problem ..... to be honest over all situation is far better then 90s , the surprising fact is a guy who dont know abot the division of sub continent and cant even spell Modi can write 20 line on genocide of Muslims in India

The problem is when you despise your ethnicity and religion become your only identity then such things happen

I literally dont want to say that but let me say it : Turks even with or without Islam will remain Turks Saudis with or without Islam will remain Arabs Persians with or without Islam will remain Persians So the question what Indian Muslims will be without Islam , and when this question comes...

Really wish we had someone like him

You know thats where the problem is , Indian Muslims , consider themselves Turks , Arabs , Persians even Syrians but not Indians . If they call themselves Indians then they have to admit that they are converted and they feel lowly that their forefathers were forcefully / bribed / Cajoled for...

I dint read your replies , will go through it

I have no shame in admitting its India's problem which is relegious in essence . To be honest , you guys are lucky to have Ataturk .

To be honest I avoid to touch the topics on the basis of relegion . In India you cant speak the truth if you do you become right wing , you cant refer to history because its bloddy . Even if you refer to holy book you become an Islamophobe . I have literally no problem with anyone outside...

you know dont trigger me I come form aplace where we have seen those who lost everything just due to their religion in 1947 , Do you know how many seats Muslim League won in Awadh ( currently ) UP in 1946 .seems like only ghost voted for them Seems like no one died in Calcutta due to direct...

Sorry Christians of Rome demaned a country specific for Muslims of South Asia in 1947 and got East and West PAkistan exclusive for south Asian Muslims. @Jackdaws

Again I said you dont know India , this secular word was eneterd in Indian constitution during emergency in the preamble in 1970's. The original constitution has no word secular in it , it has relegious minority. You literally hit the nail in India the govts which were literally blackmailed by...

The question is what it tell you ? I know what it tells me , I was born in India so I think I know and understand this country better then you

Ok so tell me why PAkistan got created in 1947 on what lines ? Who said they are not Indians but do they consider themselves Indians , most of them consider themselves above LAw and when LAw takes course they shout Islamophobia . Its a muslims problem when they divided the country on...