Search results

NATO strategy is not suit for us...Our threat perception and strategy different. We are need more and longer range air defence system especially against air breathing targets. Your suggested missile would very very expensive for air defence. We can do both missile but they would be different...

S-400 does not have exoatmospheric interception capability. I think it would be primarily air defence system for againt air breathing targets...Not missile defence system.. İsmail Demir's talk about ''domestic S-400'' is answer for TRT reporter's question ''S-400 ayarında bir savunma sistemini...

Current MK41s in our ships(Gabya, Meko) have 6.7 meter length... MDAS 8 meter length..

We are need S400 or SM-6 than THAAD or ARROW

Yeah we would have network centric warfare capability to operate 400km range missile... We need like SM-6...Long range anti-air, anti-ship..vb missile Siper most likely similar SM-2 Block 3C...We need Siper family like Standard family Siper + Booster = Siper-ER = SM-6 Sİper + Booster +...

Akbaba project developed by Roketsan....Not SAGE Ramjet AA would be long term project....We need short-medium term missile project something like aim-260 We need long range BVR missile like aim-260....Solid trust with dualpuse

You can't understand? You don't need more clear target imagine for midcourse.Clear imagine is needed in Terminal Phase...But there is active seeker for terminal phase We can use S-Band Smart-Smk2 for midcourse...US use S-band SPY-1 for midcourse.

I know ESSM block II and SM-2 BlockIIIC have active seeker but they are not operational...I'm not talking about them.

With active seeker it doesnt need X band radar for terminal terminal phase. S-Band radar is enough for midcourse

Aster missiles have active radar seeker unlike SM-2 and ESSM.

We have 21 Phalanx 8 G Class frigate 2 Akar tankers 1 Osmangazi LST 4 Bayraktar LST 2 TCG Anadolu So avaliable 4 Phalanx in Stocks for Barbaros. TCG İstanbul with Gökdeniz İDEF 2019

Gökdeniz 35mm with ATOM ammunition is more effective than Phalanx..Rate of fire is good...We don't need multi barrel.

F-35B was not considered during the TCG Anadolu tender.It came out later TCG Anadolu is not built for F-35B There is too many countries have LPD, LHD and not have fighter jet on it...US, UK, France, Italy, Algeria, Egypt , Australia, Japan, South Korea...etc

We need catapult technology and MMU Naval Carrier should planned for end of 2030s or 2040s....For now...Concepts and requirements must be made first We can't have STOVL or inefficient STOBAR...

Tomahawk can launch from 533mm capsule. Royal Navy use 533mm capsulle for tomahawk in Trafalgar and Astute submarines Scalp Naval (McDN) also use 533mm capsule There will be no air-launched Gezgin Gezgin too big for F-16's weapon station capacity...And too long for fighter jet We just need...

Green = Aluminium

We need MMU's carrier variant for aircraft carrier and land-based naval fighter role

I don't think....MMU's first flight date still 2025(or 2026) You should add for at least 5 years for IOC

F-35 bigger plane than F-16, Eurofighter,Rafale...not even close Empty weight F-16 19.000lb F-35 29.000lb Maximum takeoff weight F-16 42.000lb F-35 70.000lb