I still find it weird when land forces isn't making a large-scale order for kamikaze UAVs. Especially when their effectiveness is proven and we have many manufacturers at this point.
If I remember right there aren't any coaxial design stuff but Pavo Group and ASELSAN have folding tubular vertically flying protoytpes. ASELSAN VİHA my beloved of course.
I kinda doubt it with the A and even B variant because of TWR constraints (B with afterburner at 6.5 tons reaches 0.7). But KIZILELMA-C with two turbofans rated at 44 kN with afterburner has a TWR of around 1.05 when weighing 8.5 tons which is near F-22 with full fuel and internal weapons.
https://www.turdef.com/article/akinci-ucav-strikes-with-aselflir-500-electro-optic
MAM-T actually managed to hit a moving small target like that too, and I don't think it was going slowly. The bigger warhead's difference is felt here too.
NATF feels unconventional to go with as a variable sweep wing, I am going by the theory that they will make changes on the design like LM did on F35 for F35C. Wider wings, arresting hook, stronger landing gear, etc...
T629 I would doubt but big yes for T929. You have a greater space in terms of payload for powerful radars and light cruise missiles (ÇAKIR, KUZGUN TJ...)
Indeed and I think I actually broke it down somewhere after IDEF23. When I talked to SEFİNE about the launchers and showed the official my estimations on Blender, they revealed that this launcher is a placeholder and the finalised launcher will have two-axis movement.
Compound cargo helicopter project went pretty quick in two days.
Passenger capacity beats AW101 with 40 people and you can carry UGVs up to class of KAPGAN, ERTUNGA etc.