Search results

We do have testbed aircraft. Even ASELSAN had put a picture of its console in 2023 report

Yep, I guess it is up to TN actually wanting that capability. I don't think Roketsan would bother with it without TN wanting it? Hopefully I am just wrong...

Exhaust gases are extracted via the trench between the VLS cells, so your constraint is length of the cell.

Bit offtopic to the current discussion, but it seems to me that we can actually quadpack Siper Ü-1 if we design a narrower-taller booster. Siper Ü-1 is 238mm without booster (slimmer than the ESSM with 254mm) and 370mm with that chunky-short booster. I want to see that quadpackable 100+km...

They have more than one operational modes

Roketsan Tayfun; more than 280km range, 6.5m length, 2300kg weight, better than10m CEP, hypersonic cruise speed

doubt

Indeed, too samll to be Nazar

A bit off topic but why is that guy so anti-Turkish? He says buying Italian or French is ok but Turkish is "being fully dependent" why?

You would be correct

Nope

"MURAD 100-A’nın geliştirilmesi ile birlikte ülkemizin bu alanda ilk beş ülke içine girmesi sağlanmış olup GaN (Galyum Nitrat) çip geliştirilmesinden son ürüne kadar her aşaması milli olarak gerçekleştirilen ve uçuşlu testleri başlatılan radarımızın yüksek adetlerde üretimine yüksek teknoloji...

No useful data in your post actually

Also being at LEO, it can provide data with less latency and be more resilient to EW, as it is ~4 times closer to the end user than a GPS/GLONASS satellite, so the lost power is a lot less. That's why Ukraine is using Starlink dishes on their Kamikaze USVs. This will probably do what...

MZK isn't just for T-72, it is on the name "Modüler Zırhlı Kule" You can shave off 5 tonnes or even more with changing and using effective armour inserts rather than heavy RHA. Don't get me wrong, T-72M1's turret protection is also good enough but it isn't adequate for DM-53 and never

because T-72M1's turret is old and mostly composed of RHA. Even later T-80U or T-90A turrets weigh less than T-72M1's while offering better protection

Badger only has ERA and sensor improvement/add-ons while MZK is a whole new turret, with its own composite inserts, design and autoloader.

T-72 Badger is a different one, you should look for the MZK section

It has better armour against APFSDS than T-72B's turret's protection

MZK's addon armour has STANAG lvl6 rating. Base MZK without addon has armour inserts like any other MBT turret