Search results

well all the things about LPI, most of the cliams are, claims. The problem with intercepting LPI is modern LPI radars can mix and match their signals with background noise, they are nearly undetectable. So thats why both sides will be using radar and EW. And intercepting radars are usually not...

Haha, I just said that ASELSAN has experience in IR field before, so they wouldn't bring a bad product. Also, I didn't want to make DAS look easy to do neither

Yes :DD

Su-57 lacks VLO geometry, what about 4.9? :D

1- I said they are not an issue for now, they will be a problem when TAI/Havelsan decides to increase AI etc. And keep in mind that 2 of these F110s also keep F-15EX at the sky, yeah TF-X will probably consume more power, but at least for IOC, it should be enough. I didn't said F110 won't have...

From Anatolian Eagle 2021/2, it was stated that BEOS will have greatly better quality than ASELPOD, so I don't think that there will be problems with BEOS, So about IRST, I need to check what they offer, but the chances are I can't find anything. But with given experience of ASELSAN in thermal...

1- electric generation is not much of a problem, at least for now, and there are also APU's. But yeah in the future an engine with more power gen would be good 2- Noise is not a big problem for now, at least when the F110 TF-X will be around 3-IR signature is not too high, yes it is higher...

Because it is bothering to reply all of your BS claims

Yeah let's make TAI produce 10 different products at the same time and end up with shitty quality on all of them. Can't you get that TAI would need to expand its resources (+more money from state) while Baykar already has a working prototype with some RCS reduction and good stats? And keep in...

1- STM Kargu is not few, neither Lapis drones, Kargı will also be in mass production 2-TB-2 is cheap and effective while Anka is expensive 3- Aksungur had to be integrated with some tech before order from Navy 4- Baykar uses civilian engines while TAI uses military for most of the time, TAI is...

Because they produce different kinds of UCAVs. It is not that good to collect all the things on one company, that's why Baykar is a perfect company to make drones. Oh, why don't you question STM, Lapis, Kentsel(Vestel) and their drones in TSK use, they are also not made by TAI

Can't you do the math, TB-2 is affordable andyou can sacrifice it (+it was only at start of the operation, Baykar fixed it after only 2 downed TB-2s, that's probably the world record for UCAVs). And Anka is a MALE UCAV, TB-2 is a Tactical UCAV, TB-2s comparison is Karayel, and Karayel was worse...

Baykar got every deal with fair competition, I don't think that you know how TSK acquires UCAVs

Well, duh, no. TAI products are more expensive and that's why you don't see the same success from Anka, but keep in mind that Anka is also sold to other countries and in future Malaysia

Why are you against Baykar without any arguments?

That's not a good approach

TF-6000, that's the answer probably, And TF-10000 for MIUS

it is better them to focus on the projects they have ATM, at least there are some concepts about it

Well we do have the tech, I think it is to save costs as it would only be used on ground tests

So it's in one piece