Yes. The Union Health Minister was removed from his post and replaced. Now who in Corona King Xi's cabinet was held accountable for unleashing the Chinese virus on the world?
Yes. As I said, looks like a General and meets all the requirements to be a soldier. In China.
Nah, in China they don't claim such stuff. They just eat bats and create pandemics.
In a democracy and in the civilized world, one can't stop a person from pursuing a field or work or profession simply because his parent was in the same field.
Of course. Mao's grandson became a General on his merit. He ticks all the boxes one needs to in order to be a soldier. Which army wouldn't want such a general?
In the democratic, civilized world there are very limited restrictions on free speech. You can check with the Chinese refugees living in India. If China were a civilized nation, it wouldn't have unleashed a pandemic on the world by eating bats.
By all means, make one.
Let me clear it up since you seem confused. Chinese are insecure in general. In the civilized world, anyone can speak about the matter related to the thread. No Indian member posting on this thread brought India up till some insecure non Indian posters did. We understand the insecurity but it...
When has India or Indian members compared itself with Pakistan in the Olympics? It's as absurd as India comparing itself to Syria or Libya or some other such state. If they do it, it's wrong - it's schadenfreude to compare India with a nation which lives off IMF doles and global aid.
Sliver? Do...
Consulates open for three reasons. If large number of that country's citizens live in that city and its vicinity, if that city is a large source of visa seekers for migration / tourism and if it happens to be a major city in the host country. No place in J&K, Ladakh tick any of these boxes. No...
As far as it's the same issue, that is fine - it's the same issue looked at from a different perspective. The issue arises when completely unrelated topics are discussed. E.g. The Nazis often used the example of American treatment of African-Americans and Native Americans to justify their racial...
The more common British term is whataboutery. It's not a muzzling tactic because people who indulge it double down and defend it, even amplify their argument. It's just calling out a tactic.
Not really. When one can't argue about the issue, they bring completely unrelated issues into reference. E.g. What possibly could LTTE have to do with the Taliban? Or the IRA have to do with the Taliban? Or indeed with this thread.
Mere survival while losing your territory, self-respect and sucking up to a USA / China / Saudi for money and arms is not resilience. It's a necessity.
