Search results

So what's the number? The poor Tibetans can only be compared to persecuted Jews fleeing the oppressive Nazi regime. Of course a China doesn't have an open border. That's why these Chinese refugees going to India were shot by the corrupt and bloodthirsty CCP troops.

Was the UN delegation allowed access?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-29/un-negotiating-with-china-on-unfettered-access-to-xinjiang/100036916 Have they finally given the access?

So he came alone?

So why not allow unfettered access to the region if it is so prosperous?

Not many countries have concentration camps for their own citizens either. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-55794071

Is he a Chinese citizen who sought refuge in India?

Was this kid a Chinese refugee or not?

Refugees aren't automatically granted citizenship. Einstein despite being an American citizen was a German refugee till he was granted citizenship. They are all Chinese citizens. This Chinese citizen sought refugee status in India in 2001...

So you don't have the breakup of Chinese refugees? Did China issue death certificates to the Chinese refugees who died in India? Have you tried contacting the Tibetan Govt in exile or Peking's embassy in New Delhi to get the numbers? Or are you just making stuff up?

Give the break up.

Well, you are the one claiming they are not all are born in China. So just give the stats and data to prove it. In the democratic, civilized world bluster is associated with buffoons - sane people rely on facts and figures.

If India was so underdeveloped 100,000 Chinese refugees wouldn't have come here seeking refuge.

OK. But did you get the break up of numbers for these Chinese refugees?

Do you have the break up of Chinese refugees' in India's birthplace? Did you contact the Tibetan Govt in exile to get the numbers?

The current Govt in India assumed power in 2014. So congrats on the last few years I guess.

55,000 combatants. The rest could be within the Armed forces as non combatants like drivers, radio operators, medics etc. They would still be considered part of the Armed Forces - they would not be civilians. They were as much responsible for the genocide in East Pak as their combatant colleagues.

Good thing the Brits didn't expect their troops to swim when they evacuated them from Dunkirk.

Did someone claim "Bharat" is based on an acronym which will never bear fruit? Earlier you mixed Empires and civilizations and now it seems you are mixing up nation-states and civilizations to suit your narrative.

Considering the desired entity didn't get almost half of Punjab and most of Kashmir, perhaps it's time to revisit the acronym.