Yes, thank you for the good advice. Friend who believes that LINK-16 encryption key can bring the other person to his knees. Please ask the Turkish Air Force Forum the same. Please. 'Why do we use LINK-16?'
What are you talking about? Do you think ÖZGÜR is the ship of Theseus who plows all the F-16s? Even if you do, what about the engine do? Are you going to reverse engineer the F-110 or something?
Oh, I'm tired now. I just want others to show a healthier debate.
Why, then, does the United States make that last resort so easy? The assumption you mentioned above (Turkey buys the F-35 and the U.S. controls it as a backdoor) is the same thing that undermines state relations...
ALIS for the F-35 is actually not working properly. It's not even properly...
What makes you think the F-35 has a "backdoor"? There's no hard evidence about it, only conspiracy theory... As you say, aren't you afraid of stopping the supply of components to the F-16 because of the upcoming Syrian and Iraqi operations? What about the parts supply disruption to the E-737...
Haha, of course! For decades to come, major and minor accidents will await the F-35. But that's the way every plane has been through.
Perhaps the KF-21 that we made, the MMU that you will make, the GCAP that England, Japan, and Italy will make, and the FCAS that France and Germany will make...
What should our pilots complain about when the premise itself goes wrong in the first place? Ask Turkish pilots. Aren't we under U.S. control?
I can roughly guess what information Chinese news posted by referring to. Misunderstanding of Link-16 has once spread in Korea. Probably spread fake news...
I saw this comment at the Turkish Air Force Forum yesterday and waited for a rebuttal. But there's no real argument about this. Actually, I'm also a non-expert who doesn't know much about data links, but it is the first time I have heard that the Air Force cannot control the F-35 without the...
It's just an expression of opinion. In the current state, it is difficult for Poland to adopt and produce kf-21. Why? Because they have already decided to replace the old SU-22 and MIG-29 with the F-35 and FA-50. Other than that, it's F-16C. It's very hard to get in here.
However, I think such...
Did you know that Egypt has the fourth-largest F-16 in the world? The T-50 shares many parts with the F-16 and is advantageous for transition education. As far as I know, Egypt was running a training aircraft business, was Tejas a trainer? Does Tejas have any advantage as a trainer? So far...
The F-35 is said to be more than 1,200 NM (2,220 KM) by the manufacturer (I don't know if it used an external fuel tank. I guess so)
.
KF-21 is said to be 1,550 nm / 2,900 km. However, I know that this is a ferry Range. Calculating internal and external fuels, it seems to come out at the level...
That's right. Usually, the manufacturer says that IRST sells hardware, but not software. So Hanwha developed and integrated the software. I think we thought it would take too much time and money to develop hardware, so we wouldn't be able to meet the time we wanted. (Because F-4 and F-5 need to...
These words don't exist. If you write a contract that way, the contract will be beaten by the Board of Audit and Inspection and those involved will be arrested. As Windchim said above,such a joint development agreement states what the parties should do, how much they should share, and the scope...
As for weapons purchases, it is generally right to proceed that way and cheaper. There will be a loan when you purchase IFX later. Don't you always deal in that way? However, the transaction underway between Korea and Indonesia is risk sharing for development. It means sharing the risk while...
Which Indonesia says it is all-in to KFX? Will the modernization of the Indonesian Air Force be stopped for that amount of money?
Whether it's Rafale or F-15, I know it's because it's necessary for Indonesia's situation. However, I don't think that can be the reason for overdue payment of...
Well, that will depend on future discussions. In the beginning, it will be repaired with parts produced in Korea, but it may be different afterwards. You will have to ask the missile-related country about armed integration. Only then will it be decided whether to integrate or not. I think that...
20% of Indonesia's participation cannot have contributions or stakes in core technologies. I hope you don't misunderstand that Indonesia has paid for the core technology and has rights to it.
Isn't it natural to restrict technology transfer? With just a 20% stake in development? I want to know which country allows it to do so... Even the share was not paid within the deadline, so the original Indonesian production such as wings and tails was changed to a company in Korea. (I think...
Turkey gave up its participation in the KFX project due to excessive share of development stakes (30%), Korea's introduction of T-129 in the AH-X project (which was eventually selected by AH-64), and differences in aircraft size (medium or high).
