Search results

  1. Radko

    TR Air Defence Programs

    Well engaging is something and interception is another. We should keep in mind that ballistics have different kinds
  2. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    Yes, we do have ceramic lenses that increase the RCS, thats how Şimşek increases its RCS from a near LO number to F-16 levels
  3. Radko

    TR Air Defence Programs

    it is not the G's, it is energy left after
  4. Radko

    TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

    This was later confirmed as Bora
  5. Radko

    TR Air Defence Programs

    Depends on terminal phase, probably not or just in a very small dome, it can theoretically intercept non aerobalistic TBM/SRBMs (so not Tayfun) missiles around 36km
  6. Radko

    TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

    What if Cenk is a HGV?
  7. Radko

    TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

    Holy what
  8. Radko

    TR Altay Main Battle Tank & Related Programs

    Doctrine, all of our tanks are 4man crew, and RCWS will be controlled by Loader etc
  9. Radko

    TR Altay Main Battle Tank & Related Programs

    We don't know about Akkor yet, but Trophy's problem is operating angles. And yes I agree with you
  10. Radko

    TR Altay Main Battle Tank & Related Programs

    One thing to fix, Altay T2 is heavier. Also uses better Roketsan armour, not similar to T1 which uses Korean tech
  11. Radko

    TR Propulsion Systems

    I think we can
  12. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    it is definitely not a drag chute hub, as it is made from different pieces and has serrations both in the connection to the airframe and the nose
  13. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    And what I am trying to tell is that they cannot do it for Kızılelma, stealth is something else, RCS is a dependant stat, it needs good production quality or else it could create fluctuations or spikes in certain areas, which would mean it could hamper operational usage, it seems like they aim...
  14. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    After some usage you can also see defects on F-35 or F-22, indeed Baykar does the job for a lesser quality compared to TAI or LM, but compromising stealth for price is not something good
  15. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    They would still need to run RCS simulations for the overall design. We can easily see that they will replace parts in the future, mainly GNSS thing and antennas, production quality, and actuators. Overall design will stay the same
  16. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    You are not going to design an aircraft without RCS Sims, even 80s aircraft had been tested with those simulations, albeit simpler You really underestimate Baykar tbh
  17. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    This doesn't seem viable Even the TB-2 has really good production quality, Baykar SHOULD NOT comprise it's stealth
  18. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    Not true, ALL OF the TF-X skin is composite
  19. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    I have seen the same layout in a render too, so it might be the real shape
  20. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    Seems like it is supposed to carry 2x BVR and 2x WVR judging by the interesting shape of the bay.

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom