Search results

  1. Radko

    TR HÜRJET-Advanced Jet Trainer/ Light attack aircraft

    Probably the last comparison before choosing the LCA
  2. Radko

    TR HÜRJET-Advanced Jet Trainer/ Light attack aircraft

    Yeah, I have stated those after my OG reply, well not the canopy. Maybe they wanted to show us the increased wing area that led to 5 tons of payload?
  3. Radko

    TR HÜRJET-Advanced Jet Trainer/ Light attack aircraft

    Nvm, the inlets are blocked and there are cardboard pieces. So yes, a mock-up But why would they make another mock-up? Maybe for Malaysia?
  4. Radko

    TR HÜRJET-Advanced Jet Trainer/ Light attack aircraft

    Why does a mock-up have functioning aerodynamic surfaces, I am 99.9% sure that this is the ground tests prototype. There is literally no need for building a new mock-up when you have a ground tests version
  5. Radko

    TR HÜRJET-Advanced Jet Trainer/ Light attack aircraft

    Yeah, I think it is just the lightening making the curvature look like a flat red surface below the cockpit
  6. Radko

    TR HÜRJET-Advanced Jet Trainer/ Light attack aircraft

    Well, look at the renders, it is what it should look like, so no problem I suppose. Also, it is not really flat but the lightening and the paint lessens the effect of the curve there
  7. Radko

    TR HÜRJET-Advanced Jet Trainer/ Light attack aircraft

    Render and the mockups, yes this pic is more detailed and better but you can't really see the angles because of the compression and stretch of the photo. Like the radome/nose sector is not that small, at all
  8. Radko

    TR HÜRJET-Advanced Jet Trainer/ Light attack aircraft

    No, it doesn't have to look like an F-35 or F-22, it is not 90° to the wings? Check Has angles that doesn't lead to somewhere else also check that's why I said kind of
  9. Radko

    TR HÜRJET-Advanced Jet Trainer/ Light attack aircraft

    Also, Hürjet has RCS reduction techniques like non parallel intakes, hidden nozzle (to some extent) Stealth (kind of) shaped nose and some more
  10. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Engines don't really matter in Stealth, if they can see your 30/-30 from back, you are already done for
  11. Radko

    TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

    The problem with this chart is it takes the lift coefficient same, but in reality they are not
  12. Radko

    TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

    They do use it
  13. Radko

    TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

    Yes, paired with F-16 Özgür/70, it can hold until TF-X
  14. Radko

    TR Attack & Utility Helicopter Programs

    Well probably, they show what they are allowed to
  15. Radko

    TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

    keep in mind that MSB and SSB are not the same org. But this shows that SSB is very hopefull (they probably state these with their knowledge of the project) about TF-X, which is very good. But, i dont know if MSB will listen to the SSB
  16. Radko

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    The thing is, those "6th"gen designs wont come up until 2040s. And what is the 6th gen? What is the defining factor? AI? Power gen? PD? Drone Control? Better Avionics? or combination of some of these? Now lets take a look at your 2050 statement. 1- TF-X will definetly be mature in 2050s, the...
  17. Radko

    TR Altay Main Battle Tank & Related Programs

    Also, seems like the tests of Korean powerpacks were successful as he stated that we are trying to get Powerpacks.
  18. Radko

    TR Altay Main Battle Tank & Related Programs

    Not really
  19. Radko

    TR Altay Main Battle Tank & Related Programs

    US solved all of the problems except cost and fuel efficiency

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom