Search results

frankly speaking US navy considers hellfire for asymmetrical treats like iran or USVs. Turkish navy is not facing a similar asymmetrical treat from sea yet! However, what concerns me is Air i.e our lack of or limited protection of our navy's smaller combatants against loitering munition and...

GÖKSUR uses the BOZDOĞAN missile, developed by TÜBİTAK-SAGE and updated according to the air defense needs of naval platforms, as an interceptor missile. GÖKSUR Close Air Defense Missile System is being developed in the product family setup and offers a solution with three different...

is there any diffrence bettween Pratt Whitney and GE engines in regard to energy generation?

AIM 120 C 8 is later named AIM 120 D as we know the main difference bettwen C and D are off course range but more importantly two way data link and gps navigation I am almost certain that Gokdogan will evolve to the same direction

From the KAP; Söz konusu sözleşmeler kapsamında teslimatlar 2023-2033 yıllarında gerçekleştirilecektir. Within the scope of these contracts, deliveries will be made in 2023-2033

Thanks for expalining my post for the rest, unfortunatly sometimes what seems to be obvious still needs to be explained. just a side note: works are in progress for F 35 variant for Navy with a refueling probe as seen KC-10 equipped with a HOSE (in place of the flying boom) refueling F 35

KAAN having a refuling probe is highly unlikly (ı am saying higly unlikly for the sake of politness) since there is no logical need to for it. first of all carring a rectractable air refueiling probe is waste of valuable space on a seeking to be a stealth plane with two engines designed to have...

only problem is neither F 16 nor KAAN has a Air refueling probe But Hürjet may have

Agreed that current ATMACA booster for SİPER understandably seems to use a readly available booster for the sake of having an operational long range SAM as soon as possible, however like in the case of BARAK, SİPER booster is open to eveluation which may be focusing on VLS use I belive

it has been stated that Kemankeş can share data with TB2 and TB2 can forward the data to operator it can be related to this process???

MOAB type weapons can be an efective tool against cave and tunel networks which are the primary defences of PKK against us. So developing such a weapon makes sense or at least may be it is worth experimenting with the concept but a bit far from being economical

TF35K is in a way our Manhattan project guess so we need to gether all enginers and infrastructure available in a single pool

what you see as KAAN, KIZILELMA and ANKA 3 are just Aerodynamic shells, Certainly Both TAI and Baykar's hands are full at least for a decade or two and more

seems that Çakır has a new wing design at least for the air launced variant acompared to the variant with booster

a wild thought and unlikly but what if CENK is our first two stage balistic missile?:devilish::)

for sure with Anadolu we will gain valuable experiance and a chance to experiment and Anadolu is only option we have for now, yet ineviatably in the mid term we will be in need of a not readly available design like Juan carlos but a local dorne carrier design to accommodate Hürjet-KE-Anka3-TB3...

ok I admit Yes I skiped a very important detail '' boom''

KC-135R will be in service for next 15 years. Guess Air force is not in a hurry. After 15 years our Airforce can/will look quite diffrent from what we have now with possibly totally diffrent requirements. But who knows we may even start fantasizing about small unmaned stealth ASENAs

very interesting topic -MMU and KE should be able to see the same battlefield picture i.e a common enhanced situational awareness - not the pilot but MMU itself should be able to share and exchange data (or periodic data updates depending on the situation) with KE I mean all sorts of data...