Search results

This is not true.

We should name the Turkish version Gökbörü and the export/international version Skywolf and actively market TFX with the Skywolf name in the international arena similar to Bora/Khan. This solves everything. Skywolf also makes sense because TFX will command a "wolf pack" that consists of...

If we buy 40 new Vipers and 79 upgrade kits, we should also ask for the assembly of 40 Turkish Vipers and 80-100 Vipers for international customers. TAI can make good money from that workshare.

It is related to President's calendar which is related to the elections in late April or May.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQUID

Another grape farmer drilled near the area where the oil-like substance is discovered and found this. I don't understand why no expert from TPAO has ever visited the area since the first discovery.

IRST efficiency depends on atmospheric conditions and enemy IR signature. There are special coatings that are similar to RAM coatings that reduce IR signatures of the fighter body. There are techniques in use with jet engines that reduce the IR signature exhaust cooling with cooling air, or a...

It depends. If the RCS of Su-30 is 10 square meter and the detection range of the APG-83 for a target with an RCS of 1 square meter is 120km as one of the sources claim, the detection range for SU-30 is over 200km.

All of the electronics, FCS, armor, powerpack (Korean, later Turkish)

A Greek F-16 block 70 upgraded with APG-83 SABR can only detect a fighter with an RCS of 0.01 square meters at 29km and a fighter with an RCS of 0.001 square meters at 16km. That is why Kızılelma is important and game-changing. Even with a modest 0.01 square meter RCS value an F-16 block 70 will...

It is not ready.

Because there is no platform to put it on.

I have given the formula work your way for different RCS numbers from that. Note that real-life detection ranges might change as radars can focus a beam at tighter angles losing coverage but gaining more signal power.

According to Indians their Su-30s has an RCS of around 4 square meters.

Somewhere between 120-150km depending on the RCS of Su-30 ( approx. 4 square meters). 90 = dedection range for 1 square meter target (you can recalculate using 100 or 120km mentioned in different sources) 4= RCS of Su-30 1= RCS of F-16 or 1 square meter target Rmax= 90x(4/1)^0.25

MURAD is far superior to APG-83, I expect it to be slightly worse than APG-85.

Against what? Against 50 square meter B-52 or against 1 square meter fighters. Its range against fighter-sized targets is shared above.

As far as I know, this is not true. Kalkan has electronic scanning on a single axis. Aselsan used it as a stepping stone and switched to electronic scanning on 2 axes. https://www.savunmasanayist.com/kalkan-hava-savunma-radarii/ https://www.defenceturk.net/kalkan-ii-hava-savunma-radari...

Gökbörü is good and Skywolf is a great international name. Asena also makes sense. It can be used with the international name Skywolf and it comes from the Ashina clan of Gokturks. Gökhan is also good but it is given to air-to-air ramjet missile. I don't like Anatolian Eagle and it is already...

Harm doesn't have a ramjet engine and Akbaba looks nothing like HARM. When you have NATO standard Mk81 as the baseline you won't have radically different geometry for a small-diameter bomb.