Search results

I think that is for cruise missiles. ( like Atmaca block ii, Cakir ) But the one Aselsan is developing, is for Ballistic missile interceptor. ( which much more critical and sophisticated ) It would be probably similar to David sling. @TheInsider

It is just exhausting to see, how long these systems can take from first test firing to reach combat readiness and active deployment. Hoping to see Atmaca deployed on BN ships in the near future.

Yes. No, the first prototype will fly by 2027/28. I am not gonna call it over optimistic because what we saw with TFX development it is very possible. It seems they are abandoning the plan for adaptive cycle engine...

Nuh, Tempset, FCAS and Chinese 6th gen program will arrive around 2040. You can't expect F35 to outperform them because of obvious physical limitations. One engine cannot provide as much power for sensors and avionics as twin engine would. Its weapon bay is small. Its aerodynamic performance...

No.

If EOTS having any problem with acquiring targets, APG-81 can see through the clouds and dust. ( +Sensor fusion with EOTS ) So, even if GPS is denied, With INS+Data link course correction GBU-53/B can still hit a moving target. ( It has uncooled IIR, mmW and semi active laser seeker for...

Bruh, he totally lost it these days.😆

I just added it.

Killer drones and multi-billion dollar deals: Turkey’s rapidly-growing defense industry is boosting its global clout Taken from CNBC By Natasha Turak- KEY POINTS Turkey’s revenue from overseas defense exports rose by 42% between 2020 and 2021, with foreign contracts making up as much as 90%...

Looks like it was this winter ( definitely in Turkey )

I was trying to make guesstimate about F-35s RCS. And F-35s RCS has to do with its own capability, not with the high quality of Turkish products. ( which is another matter ) But it seems you didn't comprehend. And I literally said in my post about ERIS, "It is an excellent radar with cutting...

Nope, it is the article that @Heartbang Brought up. We were disscusing in light of that. He used it as reference in his post so naturally I did too. Besides, there is nothing to accept blindly about these highly classified strategic technologies. All we can do is to make the best guesstimate...

Bro, I actually read that article before. But the thing is, as he mnetioned clearly, this chart is without taking into account ultra-modern RAM coating ( Except for the inner surface of the inlet duct, even though it was only mnZn RAM ) that F-35 has on its fuselage. I mean it is no secret US...

We should remember F-35s supposed 0.001 RCS only from the frontal angle. Ground Radars looks up at somewhat different angle than the direct frontal angle.

Well, there are some catches. 1. FCR also has to be able to provide fire control solutions At 100+km against F35. 2. In the near future NGJ is going to be integrated with F35s 3. I believe in SEAD/DEAD mission USAF can simply overwhelm the adversary's interceptors.

Bro, it could be that. But the thing is, for IIR missile like bozdogan I am not sure of the seeker would survive the heating beyond 60km. For example, MICA RF has range up to 80km but IIR variant's range limited to 60km because of its seeker. Anyway, 50/60km would an insane range for gokdogan...

@dBSPL excellent post. Mostly, i agree with you assessment. 6th gen is not as big leap as 5th gen platforms were from 4th gen. And also i think Tempset and FCAS should be consider as 5.5 platforms. And it should be possible for MMU to match Tempset and FCAS capabilites with similar avionics...

Can you please provide any source for that? That would be extraordinary if it is true.

Duh.🙃

Hehe, he mixed up the names.😁