Search results

It's the fourth root formula. https://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/algebra/fourthroots.php Let's say, If you detect 1m2 RCS target at 100km, then you will detect a 0.1m2 RCS target at 56km. And a 0.01m2 RCS target at 31km, a 0.001m2 RCS target at 18km and so on.

I think @Nilgiri was making a point on how he felt about Western MSM in general. (Which I still disagree with. I hold it to a higher standard than he does) Probably not personally calling Jon Oliver 'lib city Karen' or something. Anyway, he will come around later tonight.

I actually watched this episode. It was more or less accurate IMO.

I wish to understand what are you saying. It's not clear. Could you elaborate more?

How did you calculate? Given the assumptions here My rough calculation for frontal aperture suggests– *255km range with PD=50% against 1m2 RCS target. *170km+ range with PD=90% against 1m2 RCS target.

Sperate program. Seperate story.

Where did you get the numbers?

What have they done to Kuzgun series? I was really counting on it for TB-3. Hoping that with Kuzgun TJ it would gain mini anti-ship capability.

What do you mean? Are you talking about the duct? Why?

@Kartal1 they got fed up with your criticism. So, they decided to make it even lighter just to own you.🤣

MTOW is half, payload is one third. Why would it compromise stealth?

No, it has a tandem warhead. Design to penetrate deep into heavy armor. Not to blow up. The small whole you see, it has gone through all the way to the other side of the launcher.

Ghost bat is not KE's future competition. Different class I would even say.

Those are L band.

I didn't see any US response mentioned in the video.

Lol, you almost got me. I thought it happened again recently. That Loss Angeles class sub wasn't one of 688i standard boats. On the other hand, kilo class boats are known for their quietness. It was definitely validating for IN. Specially given the fact that indeginous sensor onboard detected...

You are right, if we are not going against an AF with 5th gen fighter and sophisticated EW capabilities, then KE has a good chance to dominate. And yes it would be excellent cost effective choice for many countries to gain credible BVR capability. However, recent USAF experiment result should...

KE will depend on SATCOM for remote control. Which is not great for high intensity scenario. Other option is completely autonomous BVR engagement. Which would require an insane AI and high level of integration with other platform + sensor fusion. I am not convince we will see anything like that...

I am trying to process it. @Bozan @TR_123456 @Kartal1 @Rodeo et al.

Bro what? TEI is developing gas turbine technology with domestic research from start to end. That means developing an entire eco-system including all the associated technologies. Baykar will just copy paste the old Ukrianian tech and license produce it. And even to set up that production line...