Search results

  1. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    Boramae six a clock visibility is pretty bad.
  2. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    AU don't have any litening. Sniper pod have more aerodynamic sharp front sections unlike more common round shape.
  3. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    F35 has explosion cord to brake its glass first, Boramae don't. Which is why I guess KF21 ejection probably will be more "kasar" than F35.
  4. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    More of Boramae No explosion cord on canopy glass like F35 so Boramae need to jettison the whole canopy in the event of ejection. I hope that BAE's Lite HUD is as strong and tough as F-16's HUD (that HUD has to be strong to shield pilot form incoming rushing air) Edit: on a closer look I notice...
  5. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    Some source said they switched their offer to Su57. But I don't think that will fruitful. Indonesia need US approval to get their KFX ToT afterall. (Su35 aja dramanya udah panjang gini, eh mau Su57.... 😑) Renegotiation will finally come to an end...
  6. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    Do you think I'm just talking about Korean? And too bad, since 9th April it's already point of no return for us. The only thing we can do now is putting local content as much as possible, like InfoGlobal instruments, etc. Just like @Indos said. No IWB for block 2. Block 2 is just software...
  7. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    Greenligh a project that possibly become their competitors? Genius... And why those countries have to buy an aircraft which use the same subsystem with their old one (same capability), less pylons, less range, pretty much the same MTOW, and not so stealthy to begin with?
  8. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    Another alternative for A to A missile?
  9. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    Hanwha AESA Thales's RBE2-AA Just look at how different they're mounted in their respective platforms. We have to structurally redesign KFX nose sections if we want to put RBE2-AA into it. But I totally agree if ID AF use MBDA Meteor
  10. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    He's talking about current RBE2-aa Which is will be quite "old" in 2028
  11. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    I think korean AESA gonna end up better than RBE2 aesa in 2028. But I agree about integrating Rafale's weapon and EOTP (IF we buy rafale for real)
  12. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    Why there is J20 there? I hope they have nothing to do with chinese.
  13. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    I bet it's not something really crucial like AESA or IRST. Maybe some instruments in cockpit (HUD, touch screen, etc) ?
  14. Umigami

    Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

    Japan got EPAWWS. About KFX, my understanding until now is IFX and KFX will use the same (hanwha) system: avionics, IRST, etc. The only differences are just a minor thing like IFX got bigger drop tank and drag chute. But some people out there say we have to develop or buy a lot of system by...

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom