Search results

Whats the message here? The vehicle is not mabe from "vibranium"?

Politicians are opportunists. "Bükemediğin eli, öpeceksin"

Whats wrong about that ?

I mean better integration in to chassis or turret. Not only plug on.

It seems you have some valid informations.

I don’t think that chancellor Merz will like the idea that Greece financed the upgrade of there tanks with Russian systems, sponsored by Germanys taxpayers money.

I have had a telephone call with Erdo. I asked him, what a thing about a nuclear powered engine for missiles. He likes the idea and asked what is necessary to build one. I told him, first we need to quit the NNPT.

What is Germany to think about that?

...and customer needs.

Bigger, wider, more MTOW and altitude. Maybe with small iwb's.

I want to see better integrated subsystems on turret.

I wish Baykar would work on TB-4.

Correct! China and India give a fack of Ukraine or Europe. They have no common sense, just economic interests. Of course, they are not agreed with Russians invasion, but they will not risk there relations with Russia because of Ukraine and GB.

And who will use this sponsored weapons? Not to mention, that US administration will end the war.

Germany wants something. We want something. We need customs-union updates at first. Before we sign any concessions to benefit Nazi-Germany.

I am asking because I hate our defense experts statements like, “our tank is the best” or under the 3 “best” tanks in the world.

Yes, 1000 pieces are way too much. We are not in a full out war. We need fast attack vehicles (IFV) like TULPAR in different configurations.

Your whole points are almost false.

Greece, Israel, (Iran?)…

I have two questions. First, what’s the fire rate of Altay? Second, is the current engine/transmission from Batu or Hyundai?