Search results

The amount of copium in this article is amazing. Iran fired 550 ballistic missiles at Israel and failed to hit any military target. Basically what Iran started to do is pure terrorism: striking residential buildings. On the other hand Israel destroyed Iranian air defence and could bomb any...

This case actually proves my point. When you hit something there is evidence. But where are the evidence of Iranians hitting any significant military target in Israel? - there are none.

Arabs in Israel live much better than the Arabs in all neighboring countries.

Israeli migrants are best thing that can only happen: https://i.ibb.co/BKsPNrKH/Screenshot-2025-07-09-134917.png

LOL, what a silly conspiracy nonsense. The number of the Russians in Cyprus 10 times more than the Israelis.

In 2024 videos with hits were immediately published. And few days later also satellite images (which showed that they did not hit anything significant).

Thats very bombastic title, but means absolutely nothing. 90% of base territory is empty sand. So 1 missile per base means nothing at all. Most probably Israel did not even try to intercept them, because chance they will make some serious damage much lower that the interceptor cost.

Orbiter 5. Its very small UAV weighting only 75 kg. Per IDF there were 500 strike UAV sorties. Iranians managed to shoot only 5 of these. Ie. only 1 per 100 sorties.

1) Mossad is not responsible for Gaza. 2) The main problem was the concept: that if we let Gaza prosper they wont have any reason to attack us. Israel allowed Gazans to work at fields right near the border. And Gaza was indeed prospering: 3) Surely no one thought that Gaza will launch a...

Current stealth drones are extremely expensive, subsonic and cant maneuver. They are no match to manned aircraft at all. Pakistan actually proves my point: that even poor country can build modern potent air force. While Iran despite being much more rich than Pakistan relied solely on ballistic...

Israel did not attack random civilians like Iran that makes Israel more moral. And Israel could inflict the devastating damage to Iranian economy if wished. But did not do that on purpose.

This conflict is interesting because it shows the difference between the military that relies on ballistic missiles and the military which relies on air force. * Iranian has very weak air force and one of the largest in the world ballistic missile force. * Israel has very strong air force and...

Israel achievements: * 19 top military commanders eliminated (brigadier general and higher, including top of the top). * Air superiority achieved 1500 km away. Something totally unprecedented before. * Dozens of air defence officers killed. * Hundreds of IRGC and Basij killed. * All nuclear...

So far 24 killed in Israel - all civilians. No any damage to military infrastructures. Iran lost dozens of top commanders. Major nuclear sites destroyed. Heavy damage to ballistic missiles.

In Syria there are Turkic villages who preserve Turkic language. I Palestine no one speaks any Turkic. If you count anyone who had some Turkish descent as a Turk then Boris Johnson is a Turk. :)

"Palestinians" were indeed invented in 1964. Thats fact. There is no any comparison with Turks here: Prior 1964 term "Palestinian" was sometimes used for all citizens of British Palestine mandate (1922-1948) - Jews and Arabs. But it was extremely rare.

There are many idiots among the Jews. Probably more than among other nations. How do u explain the fact that prior 1967 Jewish lobby issue did not exist, but then suddenly skyrocketed?

Interesting, is not it?

This war showed once again that Putin is master of hybrid warfare but very weak in regular warfare. Using hybrid warfare he captured THREE major regional centers in Ukraine: Sevastopol, Donetsk and Luhansk with nearly zero losses from Russian side. Using regular warfare with all his army he...

How does Russia benefit from destroying Ukrainian demographics? Instead spending its resources on destruction of Ukrainian demographics they could better spend resources on improving their own.