Search results

your right. I did it by mistake. Sorry for the confusion.

chengdu j-20 mighty dragon

We were talking about different jets; you were talking about FC-31, while I was talking about the J-20.

I meant to say they accepted the trade-off that is to come with the decision to have DSI.

I have been seeing the number Mach 2 all over the place, what makes you say Mach 1.8 is their maximum speed?

but the Chinese J-20 does over Mach 2 and it has them. did the Chinese find a solution to that problem or do they just not care?

Is there a reason why they didn't go with a divertless inlet like the F35, J-31 or J-20?

shouldn't the engine be hidden like the RQ-170 or B21?

Does those anyone know how far along some of these features are?

it would probably be the TF-10000, not the TF-6000 engine since the TF-10000 is going to be used to develop the 5th-generation features needed for the TF-35000 engine.

yes, it does. The first concept art of the drone was released to the public showing the bays open. the real question is what's going on with the tf-6000 Engine, I thought a working prototype of the engine was going to be shown alongside the Anka-3 drone maybe I'm remembering wrong.

this is so true I remember reading a report that turkey has fallen into a middle-technology trap because Turkish companies preferred to be part of other foreign companies' supply chains instead of building their own brands.

Nilgiri did end the discussion essentially, and I pointed out that he was the only one that gave an actual counter-argument. the last couple of posts on the topic have been about the people's refusal to have any type of discussion instead people choice to blindly name call which doesn't help anyone.

It's a bloody warplane, not a beauty queen contestant; who in their right mind cares if it doesn't look good? Seriously, they act as if Turkey asked them to make love to it.

I was one of the first people that tried to argue against his observations instead of just calling him an Iranian agent. my recent defence of him is because I have seen the same argument about the stabilizers in several other places, and nobody has tried to counter it. That said, I do not...

some of it may be BS, but the part about the vertical stabilizes does make some sense and is something that should be discussed properly instead of people just calling each other names. Does anyone have any updates on what happening with the future engines, it seems strange that they still...

nobody is arguing about how beautiful or ugly the jet is. What 37058444 is arguing is that it doesn't do enough to enhance its stealth. most of the arguments against 37058444 have been against his character and not against his observations, except in the case of Nilgiri.

That was my original argument.

As I have stated, the jet was designed with Saab, and it is just as likely that they decided to stick to Saab's design instead of improving on it due to a lack of confidence in their ability. As for the armchair aeronautical engineers, they give a reason for their beliefs, but no one has...

I noticed that people on other sites have started talking about the vertical stabiliser's position and its likelihood to compromise stealth; maybe 37058444 may have been onto something after all; no other stealth jet has the vertical stabiliser directly over the engine. Saab, who helped to...