Search results

Advantage maybe yes, but at what price?

That's what I mean, things based on hearsay is never the right way to do it. I like to see full environment impact report feasibility reports calculated break even point (when the investment pays itself) expected income and expenses report You see everything around the canal is so vague it...

Source?

Nice catch! The 2.7tons was the minimum requirement design specification, now the design (PDR) of Hurjet has finished and the design with simulation verified (CDR) one can tell with more sureness what the real payload capacity is. I think Temel Kotil is now possibly speaking out the value after...

Lol as if there are long queues on both sides of the Bosphorus. Leave alone the 40,000 ships of now, even 10 years ago when it was 50,000 ships there were no queues. Can you show any statistic for waiting times, any!

The build of it is exactly like the Rotax 912, it is likely to be used on TB2. What is the weight? (Mimarisi Rotax 912'ye tipatip benziyor, sanirim TB2'lere bire bir degisim mumkun. Agirligi ne kadar acaba?)

That canal is cutting off 1200km, what would Istanbul canal cut off? + it would be next to a free passage. People come do not take the free door, come here pass through my canal and pay me $100k cos you are idiots and I am smart!

TFx is a very long plane, quite sizeable and that gives a thin look F35 = 15.7m long TFx = 19m long

This is a very good writing explaining exactly why Canal Istanbul is an utopia, a money pit https://www.indyturk.com/node/117311/haber/bo%C4%9Fazlardan-ge%C3%A7i%C5%9F-i%C3%A7in-3-bin-400-dolar-veren-gemilerden-kanal-istanbul%E2%80%99da-100-bin

I wish I could talk with Hulki Cevizoglu and tell him to his face all the BS he is talking about - 1 He says nothing will happen when two sea waters meet eachother. Of course nothing will happen with the sea water but the canal will have salt water and that will mix and polute the sweet water...

I truly hope I am the one wrong here, Turkey lost a lot with the "ben yaptim oldu" approach. Cos the gamble is with Turkey, and Turkey has not the luxury to dump her money in a bottomless pit.

Nope, unfortunately that is gullible thinking. Back in the 80'ties, 90'ties Turgut Ozal came up with a "brilliant" investment plan (not so brilliant afterwards) His idea was "yap islet devret", in this way he was hoping that investors would build invest in dams in South east Turkey, operate...

That's not true, if you make public investments like in hospitals, Mosques etc. you do not calculate in profit but in public service. The canal project is not for public service, it is for profit (your own statement) If so why aren't these precautions taken already? I do not like to talk on...

100m/s is 360km/h Unless your car is driving faster than that you won't achieve a faster speed by throwing the ball out of a moving car

Agree with Yasar here The initial speed (launch from aircraft) will add to range, not necessarily to max speed. for max speed the design of the missile plays the largest role

How? And for whom? Firstly there is a free passage, called Bosphorus Secondly suppose there are captains willing to pay for a canal passage while there is a free open door next to it, who will get that money? Turkey or the investors? Thirdly like with all investments before (investors...

What has natural resources to do with a canal. So the Netherlands filled the whole country with canals to get hegemony and use natural resources? Do you believe yourself with what you are saying, I am worried about you

Sorry but I have not heard a bigger BS than this lately. So we get hegemony of our own lands? I have heard a lot of BS arguments for the Canal project but this one is in top 3 most funny ones

Turkish hegemony of what?

Is that how the Ukrainian Milgem will be? Damn even Ukraine gets a better milgem than us.