off topic sometimes we are underestimating their roles but joining the A400 project was a very good decision which provided us a significant startagic air lift capacity
totaly off topic but can you imagine when I was asteğmen at Çekmeköy hava savunma okulu in 2003 all we have seen were as follows
40mm M42A1/ A2
40 mm Bofors
20 mm orlikon
35 mm orlikon
Stingers
zıpkın
HERİKKS
Kalkan radar
Turna target drone
first they were buying Australian Adelaide-class '' Oliver Hazard Perry'' frigates then French FREMM and then French Belhara and then Israeli corvets ''Themistocles'' and now
I am not a fan of Erdoğan this is for sure but I should say this sort of appeasement rethoric is quite pragmatic and necessary if we want to pursue our interests without being labeled as the next ''Iran'' and without giving much room for France and Greece
-normalizing our relations with...
-ok my main concern is that, the agreement is not directly address the status of the parts (not talking about the legal status) of Nagorno Karabakh proper that Armenian forces continued to hold (blue zone on the map), including the so caled regional capital, Xankəndi.
-Some sorces claim...
I deicided to be a optimistic but a fun comparisan would be just imagine Russia signing a peace treaty with Germany when Zhukov was in front of the gates of Berlin after passing seelow heights :devilish:
Russians can not be trusted as we all know very well, we have the case of ildip but unavoidably we we have to work/deal with them. Anyway the capture of Hankendi will be vital. it simply means the end of this artifical Armanian entity on Turkish land.
hahahaha lets call it a double trick ;) and considering all the equipment they left behind to make their tactical retreat look more convincing it should a be triple trick :devilish: like inception I am sure now even an ordinary Armanian soldier can not distinguish what is real and what is not!
in fact MTCR does not impose any binding obligation so things depends on the context or lets say things depands on, are you percived as a good guy or a bad guy by the ''international community'' if but only if the news is ture I belive we can get away with ''co-design/-develop'' scnerio...
I bet we will see an AIR ATMACA even before SUB ATMACA not only on f 16 or F 4 but ''potentialy'' on ATR 72ASW since ''it is also able to be reconfigured with additional specific systems and missile armaments to carry out anti-ship missions. ''
Ok may be it is my fault since i was not able to make my point clear for some friends so let me rephrase it . logic dictates that we should not expect SOM j to be our sole air launched anti ship missile:devilish:
Concerning ATMACA we know that there will be land based varient and submarine launched varient even a land to land varient of ATMACA for Land forces . However, I am just a bit curios why we havent heard anything about an Air Launced ATMACA in an anti ship role yet. (eventhough there are rumors...