Nope
Nope
Nope - I proposed a Kurdish state on Syrian lands
And I had also mentioned before that it would be the job of the Turkish and Kurdish government to eliminate terrorists.
But unfortunately millions of Kurd's are according to you all terrorists.
Exactly - so why are millions of Kurds, and terrorist orgainsations placed in the same sentence or placed in the same barrel?
It's just like accusing millions of Irish to be IRA terrorists.
Me too
Obviously Ukraine and you don't seem to appreciate anything that came and is coming from Germany
Modern artillery since 1st of June are referring to MLRS.
It doesn't matter what some defense minister says - they don't run the country. Show me the NATO resolution in regards to supplying...
Come on guys stop it please with this distortion of history
Unless you find it agreeable that anything with a relation to Germanic, Teutonic, Ostrogoths and the Visigoths belongs to or represents Germany
The last information I got regarding the NATO ring exchange (3 days ago) was that Poland had complained about the British not handing over the Challenger tanks to the Polish Armed Forces and that no finalizing agreement with Germany had been reached in regards to compensating the 230T-72's with...
Okay guys, being new in this forum it is enlightening for me to see the reactions - especially the last post.
So thanks for your contributions - and I won't bother you fellows on that matter anymore - promise.
Syria after all was Turkish land for a thousand years
yes bringing in a proposal
I don't ignore or tolerate any terrorism and I don't play ignorant - i brought in a proposal - that's all
True
True - therefore Turkey's move to hand over occupied Syrian territory to form a Kurdish state would be a historic 1st time achievement.
Imagine China...
Strange assortment of a MBT force.
Abrams, K2's, Challenger and Leo 2A6/A7 are on their agenda. Which NATO country presently or in future would field 4 different MBT's?
really?
I wasn't aware that Syria already belongs to Turkey - sorry
Ahh...NO...then you will bring up the holocaust and that would be a no win situation for me. :)
No, but in his last address towards the NATO membership of Finland and Sweden, he mentioned something about the USA's obligation to fight terrorism. ;) specifically in Syria.
Taking the progress of hyper-sonic-missiles into account, especially those by China and "supposedly" Russia, I kind of fail to see the reason as to why anyone would still want to invest $ into submarines.
Logic would dictate that a great-full "new nation" would know who it owns it's existence to.
That some hot-heads/fanatics might still prefer to continue onto terrorism can't be out-ruled. But I am sure that in such a case the government of "Kurdsyria" would rather cooperate with Turkey in...
Exactly, and be open to ideas that might solve a big problem peacefully.
I would certainly not agree to a separate Kurdish state within Turkey. But there is presently an opportunity to create such a place in Northern Syria.
Take it or leave it :) = literally.
You can hold a vote - and I promise you the vast majority of people living there want to remain with China.
True
Why? they are supposedly a Turkish, Syrian, Iraq and Iranian problem - and one shouldn't push ones own problem onto others.
Why bring in all those negative examples - maybe Turkey could do better? even set an example?
I see your avatar displaying the union jack - wasn't it a great idea to give Ireland it's independence after 500 years of occupation and injustice? besides some usual European animosity amongst each...
