the cutout for NSM launcher hatch can already be seen, looks like it will be 2x4 (8 canister) setup with launcher facing the bow/front.
i hope they replace the yugoslavian 20mm with oerlikon millenium instead.
which one do you guys think is better though, an all in one SPAA systems (surveillance radar + Target acquisition radar + anti air weaponry either cannon or missile are in one platform) like Pantsir, Tunguska, Gepard AA, Type 87 or PGZ-09.
or a systems with multiple separate module that are...
yeah i guess the one version with 35mm munition are rather too bulky, it does make more sense if it's equipped with 30mm instead.
but those solution are rather lacking in detection sensor (they merely depend on that EO/IR )
well this was rheinmetall explanation regarding their skyranger turret, those small square thing are AESA radar.
"He started from the first link of the air defence chain, that is sensors allowing target detection, “The first issue is to see the target, which is not easy task when dealing with...
Self Propelled Anti Air presentation for Arhanud.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CbRO1rbvwW_/
presentation done by PT.RDI (the one that offer pandur solution to AD in cooperation with excalibur army), perhaps it will use Pandur 2 Platform.
here's a full ceremonial stage report.
6:45 time section that, the transfer of technology process are ongoing and PT.Pindad itself are still preparing the infrastructure for mass serial production.
amphibious IFV with UT30MK2 or ATGM canister for fire support (unless those amphib variant of pandur could handle the weight of 90mm or 105mm cannon) , while the zaha or LVTP can employ either 50 cal mg or 40mm AGL.
pandur 2 installed with turret or RCWS will have much more of it's internal space taken and only can carry few additional soldiers, they're good for IFV role, but i still support if our marine corps buy it.
LVTP or ZAHA in other hand might be a suitable amphibious battle taxi role for our...