LMAO THIS IS SO FALACIOUS
"Fact is every fighter plane (F4 and F16) in TAF can carry at least two SOM at the same time while only Mirage (one) and Rafale (two) have the capability to carry SCALP."
You make the point that only two planes can use SCALP in HAF , unlike Tuaf which again you listed...
Didn't say that, what i said was that I keep hearing you guys brag about "combat proven" results but the only combat use i've read about them was against 60s soviet junk, then I followed it up with I would be happy to hear though if there were any combat results against newer equipment. but...
“Well okay yeah it’s unfair to compare a new missile with a 50 year old design missile when you have newer missiles, but let’s compare the 50 year old design missile again with a different new missile (ok not the French version but the one you have ) even though you have the SCALP”
Do you hear...
Never heard of the NH-90 being problematic? HOT and Milan AT are both regarded as extremely successful, and MDBA claims that it was Turkeys fault not theirs and the 214 problem from my knowledge was fixed and the sub now performs amazing .In your above examples, all problems were detected in...
“We are saying what we have is better than you. The latest Exocet is nothing interesting”LMAO AGAIN why are you comparing the Exocet? Are you seriously implying that the SCALP EG is worse than yours ?
My favourite part when I’m arguing in this forum is usually they not only assume that the new project is going to be finished on time AND be better than the current US and French standards, but they take it as FACT that it will be so much better that they will 100% counter/jam/win against any...
Again their predecessors and other missiles made by the companies have had great success, so why would they be worse when they all use the same principles with improved technologies? Also I’ve only heard the Turkish missiles being successful against really outdated planes, but if you could cite...
My bad I was mistaken. But rightfully so? You’re comparing a 50-year old design with a “top of the line Turkish missile” but aren’t even embarrassed by the fact that it has basically only 170km of extra range and has 0.4x the range of a 2002 missile ? I mean I do agree you guys have the...
Yes because the Rafale has actual published specifications, Data, Red Flag results, beat other aircraft in various criteria on several different purchase competitions by Nations and has a history of 50 years of linage and R&D with historically proven results.
“ No it doesn’t count, anything could change mid flight and the deal can be cancelled so you can’t use Rafale as an argument in Air Supremacy against my argument of the delayed Turkish theoretical prototype project that is being pushed back to 202X that will wipe both French And U.S Systems.”
From what I heard nEURon isn’t really an actual product that will be sold , it was made more as a testbed study and to gain R&D information for other future programs.