The shahed 238 indeed looks a lot better than the 136 but at the same time it is more vulnerable to IR and mass producing might be an issue with all the western components involved(probably why we haven't seen it being used a lot).
Ah yes well if your gonna have a military the first thing is to...
Didnt the defence secretary deny being in any formal negotiations for the su57 or the f35? Instead we are betting on HAL who have a STELLAR track record for delivering stuff on time
Real stealth drones like the RQ-180 or the lijian or the ch-7 or the s70 are infinitely superior to the shahed. At the end of the day shahed is a kamikaze drone. It doesn't even need to work in tandem with a stealth craft, it needs to be damn good.
Right now the name of the game is not having...
Lmao. The world is really going bonkers rn lol.
Anyway this seems like a classic good cop bad cop roleplay so i wouldn't trust a word that comes out of his mouth and rely solely on official news
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-israel-launch-new-attacks-after-tehran-rules-out-nuclear-talks-2025-06-21/
Dk why the link shows something different but the US attacked 3 of irans nuclear sites one of which was fordow
I think iran is cooked but if the US cannot untangle itself...
The issue is that you are giving nukes to what is probably the second most unstable region on the planet after africa(the places with constant civil war) and the region with a lot of extremists who if given access to such equipment have a decent chance of causing mass casualties
1. This twitter acc seems to be kinda unreliable but who am I to judge but thats my personal opinion
2. Pakistani intelligence is not particularly neutral so i would take anything from them abt india with a massive grain of salt
3. It's seems to be a single twitter acc or very few accs...
I don't particularly understand? Why would we do so? Don't we also have multiple interests in Iran like the chabahar port etc? Also is there any actual evidence of a large amount of Indians being involved or is this hearsay?
Also arent the majority of the iranian nuclear facilities underground? wouldnt it be insanely hard for isreal to strike the actual nuclear weapons hold of iran? or is this just a superficial strike to strike fear into the hearts of the iranian military and civilians?
ummm forgive me for being a bit late to the party but can anyone give me a TLDR of the recent events?
from what ive gathered it seems like isreal has striked iran for "being close to the completion" of making a nuclear missile.
Is this claim substantiated ? does it have any valid proof ?
And in...
