The only notable feature of that UAS is being amphibious, but there are a lot more capability that I suspect that UAS do not have, particularly in the terrain following, obstacle avoidance, collision avoidance, and target tracking. All those capabilities need to be automated.
Most likely it will be a used airframe, with Garuda stock being one of them. The selling point of A330 MRTT is about using existing stock airframe rather than a new dedicated one
FLIR is a brand. There are others OEM thermal imager supplier. As for the gimbal mounting, there are plenty of suppliers that provide customize gimbal mounting. Obviously it's a very expensive path to take compare to procure ready-made commercial / industrial system such as the one I've posted above
And WHY would the 🇩🇪 Navy boat loaded with 🇫🇷 weapon when they themselves already have IDAS missile❓And beside what there is little point of having sub launch AShM anyway. The primary role of a submarine is to sunk enemy ships by poring water in, NOT to punch a hole on them.
*sigh* another prototype. The whole "dibangun dengan rahasia" also extremely dubious in nature.
IF we truly want for cheap & capable UAS, we should procure commercial / industrial system under gov't / military sales package, that way we get a lot of leverage for platform customization and...
We should treat the offering very carefully. I'm not saying the missile is bad or something (it's a brand-new type of missile). 🇵🇰 is a very close ally if not client state of 🇨🇳. And do remember against whom we intend to use that missile if we ever decide to procure them.
It will be geopolitically suicidal to ditch 🇺🇸 Goods & Service even if we substitute them with something from either 🇬🇧 🇪🇺, 🇯🇵, or 🇰🇷. We need 🇺🇸 direct assistant WHEN things get hot at our northern border.
Bumping hull isn't uncommon in maritime practice. Which is why I always sternly against any naval or even patrol vessel that is made from plastic (example, that overhype trimaran boat)