Search results

You dont understand my word. I said that most of top 10 Navies in the world didnt have something like Makran(which is useless)So the Navy tonnage still had some meaning. We can just ignore the iranian(and North Korean)

I think Turkiye is like the Prussian of 1850s,we need to have enough wise to avoid any direct war with great powers(US EU and China)

Navy tonnage still had some meaning.( something like Makran-class tankers arent in most of top navies) That s not like the ship number,which north korean had many mini ship.

1or 2 CV is needed but no more. We need 40+ submarine including 10 nuclear one. Chinese will finally have 8-10 CV group

The geographical situation of Turkish navy is like world war German and cold war Soviet (also the ottoman empire but that's too ancient) Western naval powers can block them(and us) very easy in war time. So we depend on submarines to the high sea.The aircraft carrier and surface fleet are...

We should follow the idea of Soviet navy,we will use our carrier to have a foothold,also mainly use submarine to against the enemy s great fleet

When will Hurjet actually fight FA-50 in the international market?

I think some ideas of Soviet Navy in cold war is useful for us,because they were in a blocked ocean like us. We should invest much on submarines and missiles(and the drones) to destroy any enemy witin 1500km. TCG Anadolu and other carriers can be used like the Kiev class,just use drones...

That will be like a Kiev class or Admiral Kuznetsov Class.

I think it's just political propaganda now like the Russia. The countries which actually build aircraft carrier.(for example China and Japan) are just keep on building the ships. Russian keeping write statement that they will have a new ship but never take action...

Of course no need a titanyum hull. We should have a nuclear submarine like this. 3000 ton and 30 crew,we should develop a new type nuclear reactor on that.

Yes. We also need a 3000-5000 ton class fast and quiet nuclear attack submarine that we can send them to the high sea to theat enemy's navy. Nowadays every enemy think their fleet is safe if they stay 1000km far from our land.

Also we can use the situation of Russia to get some technology from them especially nuclear power of submarines or surface ships. We can have a modern version of Alfa class submarine.

Yes, but our military purchases have been difficult to understand. We could develop SIPER but tried to buy the Chinese HQ-9 and others, if US didnt block us ,we maybe depend on this Chinese product(Later Chinese bought S400 too).

We didnt need to worry that,they will not sell to us. French brought for 1.2billion. https://defbrief.com/2023/06/08/ga-wins-1-2b-deal-for-electromagnetic-catapult-work-for-french-us-carriers/ If not to buy Chinese one,we have to do by ourself.

We can compare with the Japanese izumo class,which was 120 billion jpy+40 billion to changed to a F-35 carrier. Totally about 1 billion USD.

We have to develop a nuclear-powered reactor of our submarines but still a white paper until now. Steam powered catapult is old but even Russian and Chinese decides not to develop that.That s stupid to waste money on that. If we just build a CV.That are only Mig-29k we can get…..

I guess they are like the Russian,just talk about the aircraft carrier again and again. But If we get electromagnetic catapult tech we can fly Kaan.

Actually They were all conquest by us before defeated by Western, There only a few countries never became a colony in modern history.Even in west, France conquest by German in WW2) US UK Russia Ottoman-Turkey(defeated but not be conquered) China(if not count the Machu as foreigners)...

Glock in other countries is like canik in Turkey.Just a useful good gun,not a luxury Collection. Almost no one will buy an expensive Glock but a Gold high price luxury 1911 or Colt Python.