T
triangle
Guest
My guess one of those four... MTU (Germany), Doosan (South Korea), Fiat-Iveco (Italy), Wärtsilä (Finnland)
My guess: Iveco, Doosan, Malyshev 6TD-X with a slight chance of the AVDS-1790 1500HP.
My guess one of those four... MTU (Germany), Doosan (South Korea), Fiat-Iveco (Italy), Wärtsilä (Finnland)
That's what I am thinking as well.Is he considered a trustworthy insider?
I think Russian 57mm is going to be the solution for this problem. Very high penetration, and high fire rate for a large caliber autocannon.German IBD armour introduced in Eurosatory 2018 !
Stanag-5 protection against 25mm APDS-T: 135kg/m2 (Roketsan 114kg/m3)
Stanag-6 protection against 30mm APDS-T: 180kg/m2
So basically you are going to have to redesign a whole lot of the tank and production will be delayed even further? and what about suspension as well?Isn't there an embargo on the transmission as well?
Altay MBT production has been started. The production starts with 5 MTU engines which was previously procured and followed by newly ordered ones.
PS: The new ones are not had to be MTU engines.
And what about the factory? Has anyone pics of the BMC factory?
Changing the engine on a tank is not like changing the engine on a fighter jet. There will have to be some modifications but it won't mean a complete redesign. These things should be designed primarily with interoperability in mind as there are bound to be supply issues somewhere down the line. Also in the current world we are awaiting more powerful electric engines. Altay will still be in use when these engines come available so accommodating a future engine should also have been considered.So basically you are going to have to redesign a whole lot of the tank and production will be delayed even further? and what about suspension as well?
Now I am convinced that it is a completely troll account. He said that before IDEF 2017, a mass production contract will be signed with OTOKAR at the fair. I was surprised that they almost did not award OTOKAR to BMC, let alone award the tender to OTOKAR.And what about the factory? Has anyone pics of the BMC factory?
That is why I'm dreading that TEI won't be able to deliver a useable engine at the end of 2020 for ATAK.The engine is more important than the platform, so those who said that the engine is domestic were right. If the engine projects are not taken care of, the TF-X Hürjet Hürkuş ATAK-2 shares the same fate.
Using existing MTU engines literally means BMC is trying to receive funds for serial production. In such projects funding is provided by steps, morelikely one step here was production of some amount of units. If the final engine exists as claimed by the twitter user, noone would switch the production line after 5th unit and would directly start with the final engine.Is he considered a trustworthy insider?
Also isn't the BMC assembly hall for the Altay still not ready to produce Altya's? How are these Altay's then produced? By Otokar?
Well, then any other tanks are doomed as well. These are STANAG -"standards"- ,if you are unfamiliar with, which armours are tested accordingly. It doesn't prove anything regarding to the ultimate resistance (as you may guess)I think Russian 57mm is going to be the solution for this problem. Very high penetration, and high fire rate for a large caliber autocannon.
The TS-1400, developed for ATAK, has matured. The authorities are making confident statements. The tests of the engine are also going well. I think it goes according to the project schedule and will be successfully completed towards the end of 2021.That is why I'm dreading that TEI won't be able to deliver a useable engine at the end of 2020 for ATAK.
What I'm trying to say is that 30mm, and 25mm are not enough in modern combat against advanced armor capable of defeating it. Dealing with a 57mm autocannon means you have to redesign entire armor IFVs, and APCs around that threat completely which will be much harder considering with modern rounds it can penetrate much more armor reaching over 100mm of RHA with 50s ammunition and probably much more with APFSDS.Well, then any other tanks are doomed as well. These are STANAG -"standards"- ,if you are unfamiliar with, which armours are tested accordingly. It doesn't prove anything regarding to the ultimate resistance (as you may guess)
It is not surprising that armour technology has been surpassed by missile /rounds technology, just like ships has been, tanks of future will rely on low visibility, footprint and active hard or soft kill protection.