There is a difference between the interpretation of these agreements by the strong countries and the interpretation of the weak countries. For countries that are left alone within NATO, such as Turkey, these agreements are interpreted by emptying the articles and making excuses. In other words, the law of the strong is superior to the law of the weak. That's why the USA, the British and the French can easily interpret that agreement as they wish. This article does not reduce the tension that increases in such a situation. The killing of a Greek Prime Minister in Ukraine is tantamount to trampling on NATO's pride. This is no different from the sinking of the Russian cruiser Moskva. If you trample NATO's pride, they will feel obliged to fight back.
This is actually all about belonging. NATO's borders are blurry for Ukraine. I don't think they would be in favor of going to war right away. However, they will not refrain from taking steps that increase the possibility of war.
Turkiye shot down a Russian jet we seen how Nato solidarity went.
Nato is a paper tiger. Deep down they all know they wont go to war for a member state in particular the ones from the East like Turkiye, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria and the Baltic.
Article 5 will only be unleashed unless the West gets attacked.
Which is the USA and Western Europe.