Relying so much on China when it comes to trade could be a double edge sword.I get what you are saying....but honestly I think we need to look at the (elitist + business + political) population/establishment as a whole for each country.
PRC one is really quite bad imo. I have dealt with mainlanders across a fair spectrum from this elitist subset...and they are demonstrably worse overall to most major countries due to underlying superiority complex esp with non-white, non-han races.
This is for example why we see Indonesians and Indians targetted in most atrocious ways at certain other forum where this complex is allowed to come to full establishment...and there is no calling out of it by their own more reasonable types (that once existed but now all gone or changed seemingly). It is not even their elitist group, but just the tiers below it (given who picks up english in China or emigrated etc).
In larger context, it extends to say what/how Chinese elitists (in their sustained discourse when it comes to ASEAN etc) use Indonesia diversity (say chinese indonesians w.r.t pribumi) and pluralistic resilience as some kind of cherry picked wedge issue too...all the while doing what they do to their own non-Han minority groups quite openly now.
Although I do give benefit of doubt there is still only some transmission to the laypeople of the elitist group's attitudes/behaviour/thinking etc (and done under the circumstance of power/stability control), so we cannot judge entire country on this subset...and same for PRC.
But there is much more we have to analyse than just transactional side of relationships....and yes the West is definitely much to be improved there on how they conduct that (hypocritic sermons etc).
But definitely they are nowhere near one (as complete working unit) like that takes shape under totalitarian mindset and middle kingdom ego.
@Indos @#comcom
They could weaponized it at their whims. Just look at the recent Australia goods boycott for example
Last edited: