Latest Thread
Funny now literally every outlet but Scott's source is saying nobody's died yet.
They probably will, 67 wounded it stands to reason, but c'mon man. It's so easy to see through your propagandist stuff.
"6500 Americans killed on 9/11!" - source, Bin Laden, Sep 12th '01. Baha.
Comparatively.
Also chemical shells aren't illegal, and they warned them to get out, a warning which was refused. Important context.
Russia has been using tear gas in Ukraine for multiple years. It's been extremely well documented.
Hopefully Israel ratchets up the intensity of their air strikes in response and creates 10 casualties for each one they endured in strike. Bomb military targets (including civilian infrastructure being used as such) back into the stone age.
Let me get this straight .... Did you consider the shelling on UN facilities were legal / justified ??Comparatively.
Also chemical shells aren't illegal, and they warned them to get out, a warning which was refused. Important context.
No, I don't think shelling a UN site is legal. I think it's strictly illegal under international law.Let me get this straight .... Did you consider the shelling on UN facilities were legal / justified ??
And @Relic ...those question are for you too ....
Just give us a direct answer of yes or no ...
An NGO claims it might be WP and not tear gas. Using WP near the vicinity of UN troops certainly would make this a new thing.Russia has been using tear gas in Ukraine for multiple years. It's been extremely well documented.
Why should we interfere in the Arab-Israeli enmity, which is already 2000 years old, when hundreds of millions of Arabs are silent?Please look wat the doctors and nurses saw in Gaza.
Turkey, Pakistan, Iran and Azerbaijan should unite in a temporarily militairy alliance and wipe the Entity from the earth, taking all the risks.
These countries combined have nukes, drones, tanks, artillery, fighterjets, choppers, navies, oil, gas, rockets, missiles, massive armies and a combined population of 400 million people.
View attachment 71159
Let me get this straight .... Did you consider the shelling on UN facilities were legal / justified ??
And @Relic ...those question are for you too ....
Just give us a direct answer of yes or no ...
For real let the ummah look after themselves, leave us out of itWhy should we interfere in the Arab-Israeli enmity, which is already 2000 years old, when hundreds of millions of Arabs are silent?
Behind Israel is the United States, the world hegemon. Do we need enmity with America? Don't we have enough enemies?
P.S. O Allah! Tajikistan...Türkiye... the Netherlands...
The further west our respected colleague gets, the more radical he becomes![]()
Why should we interfere in the Arab-Israeli enmity, which is already 2000 years old, when hundreds of millions of Arabs are silent?
Behind Israel is the United States, the world hegemon. Do we need enmity with America? Don't we have enough enemies?
P.S. O Allah! Tajikistan...Türkiye... the Netherlands...
The further west our respected colleague gets, the more radical he becomes![]()
Thanks for the answer ...No, I don't think shelling a UN site is legal. I think it's strictly illegal under international law.
But I'll repeat what I said previously. I don't think it matters at all, because the U.N. is a sham institution, whose only real "hard power" comes in the form of the members willing to put their own military power on the line for the sake of enforcement.
Just like Russia vetos the Security Council from doing anything to stop it's offensive war in Ukraine, USA counters by using it's veto to stop any U.N. action against Israel.
If you want to eliminate the Jewish State, stop crying to the U.N. you're going to have to defeat Israel, USA, Britain and their Allies in war. That's your path. Not crying to a bunch of worthless suits.
...Yes? They were told the IDF was going to be hitting the area, a courtesy warning and ample time to get out. The UN guys raised the middle finger. That's on them. If the UN wants to start actually fighting Hezbollah, great, but they're useless like in every other instance the UN sends troops. They rejected the call to make themselves scarce? Okay. We all make choices.
Relic, yeah, agreed. I have no problem with Hezbollah hitting that army base, war is war is war, people both sides die. They just don't get to complain when the IDF inevitably explodes a shitload of Shia-aligned heads in response with 1000 time the firepower. Works both ways - if they believe in "might is right", the IDF's obviously the mightier and down comes the hammer.
Scott, it's four dead as of your second post, yes. As I said, these things are fluid, if there's 67 injuries then there's likely going to be deaths. Thing is, at the point you'd posted your first post, nobody had died - you knew that at the time, and you claimed a lot more than 4 (many dozens from, from memory) in your (now conveniently deleted) post. This is what you do, and everyone sees through it. You're a "Ghost Of Kiev!" guy, just for Hezbollah rather than Ukraine.