Live Conflict Israel-US vs Iran War (2026)

[Okaber]

Have some shame. Utanın aq utanın Fars faşistlerinin propagandasını yapıyorsunuz şurada.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2035717357499257065

 

[YeşilVatan]

I think some people who are watching the events unfold are skipping over a significant shift in Iranian power structure: Bibi and his puppy decimated the geriatric leadersip in Iran. All that is left is younger, more energetic, more resourceful and much more radical cadres of IRGC.

To the gentlemen among us who are historically inclined, this can be likened to how the Ottoman military old guard was liquidated after the Balkan Wars with a coup. Ottoman army as a result of this went on to implement numerous structural reforms in short time and vastly overperform in the WWI, even if the war was ultimately lost.

"Young colonels with MRBMs with no command & control oversight? They must be mad!" the westerners would think. This is anathema to contemporary Western institutional education. Yet from a systems philosophy point of view, Iranians have all the ingredients for a high organisational efficiency.

• A clear view of the enemy, no mind games.
• High agency leadership even at the lower levels.
• Little to no constraints from upper ranks, no red tape.
• They have experience, they have been operating with proxies for 25 years.
• They have the motivation and morale to keep fighting (it seems).
• They have the tools to reach their enemy.
• Their targets are stationary. Easy to overwhelm.
• If and when they manage to provoke a land war, they win.

Unless USA (or Israel) discovers a way to minimize the attacks to a negligible level, they will lose for economic reasons. This has already become a quagmire.

My worst case scenario is Israeli state will nuke Iran. They have the inhumanity to do it.

 

[Passenger]

“If Iran doesn’t FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the Strait of Hormuz, within 48 HOURS from this exact point in time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST…” - President DONALD J. TRUMP

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2035516932498030879

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) has released a statement, saying that should the power plants be targeted, the Strait of Hormuz will be “completely” closed and will not be reopened until the facilities are rebuilt.

It also said that Israel’s power plants, energy infrastructure, and information and communication technology would be “extensively targeted”, and that similar companies in the region with US shareholders would be “completely destroyed”.

It added that power plants in countries in the region hosting US forces would be legitimate targets.

Iran warns of strikes on regional energy, water sites after Trump’s threat

Donald Trump threatens to 'obliterate' Iran's power plants if it fails to open the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours.

www.aljazeera.com

 

[nick.f76]

How the war in Iran “hit” Turkey - ProtoThema English

The new balances in the Middle East and the Eastern Mediterranean have exposed Ankara’s weaknesses. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan sees that American plans do not include him, Israel is the undisputed regional power, while Greece is consolidating its position by making a “show of strength” and...

en.protothema.gr

Overview: A Region in Flux
Following the joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure on February 28, 2026—codenamed Operation Epic Fury—Turkey has found itself in an increasingly untenable position. While Ankara initially sought to play the role of a "cautious neutral," the rapid escalation of the conflict has forced the Turkish government to confront a multifaceted crisis that threatens its domestic stability and regional standing.

1. The Military Escalation: Rockets over Anatolia
The article highlights that Turkey's neutrality has not shielded it from the physical reality of the war.
* Missile Interceptions: As of mid-March, at least three Iranian ballistic missiles have violated Turkish airspace. The most alarming incident occurred on March 9, when NATO’s missile defense systems (including the Patriot and SAMP/T batteries) intercepted a projectile over the city of Gaziantep.
* The Target: NATO Assets: Intelligence suggests that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is not "accidentally" straying into Turkish territory. Instead, they appear to be testing the "red lines" of NATO’s eastern flank. Specifically, the Kürecik Radar Station in Malatya—a critical node for tracking missile launches—is believed to be a primary target.
* Ankara’s Response: President Erdoğan has transitioned from calling for "restraint on both sides" to issuing stern warnings to Tehran, cautioning against "persistence in error." However, he faces a domestic dilemma: responding too harshly could drag Turkey into a ground war, while remaining passive undermines national sovereignty.

2. The Economic "Hammer Blow"
Turkey was already battling high inflation before the war; the conflict has acted as a massive accelerant.
* Energy Paralysis: With the Strait of Hormuz closed and Iranian gas pipelines damaged by airstrikes, Turkey’s energy security is in tators. Brent crude has stabilized at levels between $110 and $130 per barrel. The article notes that this adds billions to Turkey's monthly import bill, forcing the Central Bank to burn through remaining reserves to support the Lira.
* Trade and Tourism: The "spring season" for tourism—a vital source of hard currency—has effectively been cancelled. Cancellations from European and Russian markets have surged as the Eastern Mediterranean is now classified as a "high-risk war zone." Furthermore, the disruption of the "Middle Corridor" trade route has cut off Turkish exports to Central Asia.

3. The Humanitarian and Security Shadow
The report places heavy emphasis on the "two-front" threat posed by borders:
* The Refugee Wave: Turkish authorities are bracing for an influx of millions of Iranians. Unlike the Syrian crisis, the Iranian exodus includes a highly educated middle class and political dissidents, alongside rural populations. Ankara fears this will further inflame nationalist sentiments at home, where anti-refugee rhetoric is already at a boiling point.
* The Kurdish Card: The war has created a power vacuum in northwestern Iran. Turkey is monitoring the PJAK (the Iranian wing of the PKK) closely. There are fears that these groups could seize sophisticated weaponry from abandoned Iranian depots, which would then be funneled into Turkey to resume the insurgency in the southeast.

4. Geopolitical Realignment
The article concludes that the war is forcing a "Western pivot" that Erdoğan had spent a decade trying to avoid.
* Reliance on NATO: The effectiveness of NATO defenses in protecting Gaziantep has shifted public opinion. The "strategic autonomy" Turkey sought is currently being overshadowed by the immediate need for the U.S. and NATO security umbrella.
* The Greek-Cypriot Factor: While Turkey is distracted by its eastern border, Greece, France, and the UK have significantly increased their naval presence in the Eastern Mediterranean. The article suggests Ankara feels "encircled," fearing that Athens is using the crisis to solidify its maritime claims while Turkey is pinned down by the Iranian threat.

Conclusion: The "Trap" of 2026
Proto Thema describes the situation as a strategic trap. If Turkey aids the West, it risks long-term enmity with a vengeful Iranian neighbor and potential terror attacks at home. If it stays neutral, it loses its influence over the post-war settlement of the Middle East and remains economically crippled by the fallout. The report warns that the coming weeks will determine whether Turkey emerges as a regional stabilizer or the next victim of the spreading contagion.