• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

Live Conflict Israel-US vs Iran War (2026)

Fatman17

Experienced member
Moderator
Pakistan Moderator
Messages
1,535
Reactions
11 1,507
Nation of residence
Pakistan
Nation of origin
Pakistan
War that could swallow the world 🌎.

"The world is walking a path toward a world war, and no one — including the president of the United States — seems to be in command of events," writes David French.
 

Fatman17

Experienced member
Moderator
Pakistan Moderator
Messages
1,535
Reactions
11 1,507
Nation of residence
Pakistan
Nation of origin
Pakistan
IMG-20260812-WA0023.jpg

As tensions persist around the Strait of Hormuz, countries across the Middle East are investing in alternative pipelines and overland corridors in a bid to reduce dependence on one of the world's most strategic waterways
 

Fatman17

Experienced member
Moderator
Pakistan Moderator
Messages
1,535
Reactions
11 1,507
Nation of residence
Pakistan
Nation of origin
Pakistan
Frustration with Washington is growing in the Persian Gulf region, where U.S. allies are increasingly concerned that President Trump is unable to manage the diplomacy necessary to secure peace with Iran, Arab and Western officials say.

After months of conflict, and continuing missile and drone strikes by Iran and its proxies, three officials and a former U.S. diplomat told The Post, the governments of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain are now united in their aggravation with the administration.

Read more: https://wapo.st/4x4zvgn
 

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
478
Reactions
15 873
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
How a False Nuclear Claim About Iran Ricocheted From India to Washington

A dubious post that spread on X became the basis of false claims that Iran’s leadership had declared it a nuclear power.


1786933429031.png

Funeral ceremonies for Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, in Tehran in July.Credit...Arash Khamooshi/Polaris for The New York Times

By Steven Lee Myers Ronen Bergman and Farnaz Fassihi
Steven Lee Myers reported from San Francisco, Ronen Bergman from Tel Aviv and Farnaz Fassihi from New York.
Aug. 16, 2026, 5:01 a.m. ET


On the morning of Aug. 5, an anonymous account on X in India posted seemingly sensational news. The commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps had vowed that his country would never give up its nuclear weapon ambitions as long as Israel and the United States possessed those weapons, the account said.
It was not true, and there’s no evidence that the commander made the remark or that Iran has developed nuclear weapons. The claim soon caromed around the internet anyway.
The quotation appeared on Israeli accounts, and then a television channel there posted it, calling it the first public declaration that Iran was working to build a nuclear bomb. That evening, it made its way into remarks that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered at Mount Herzl in Jerusalem, the country’s national cemetery.
In the United States, Mike Waltz, the Trump administration’s ambassador to the United Nations, reposted the quotation, as did Senator Rick Scott of Florida, a Republican. Fox News also reported the claim, as anchors and guests cited it as evidence of Iran’s duplicity.

The quotation, attributed to Brig. Gen. Ahmad Vahidi, was part of a campaign that succeeded in misleading politicians and news organizations around the world, according to a review by The New York Times. The claim’s spread showed how easily viral disinformation can twist the public debate over matters as serious as war and peace.
It is unclear who fabricated the quotation. However, it appeared intended to bolster Mr. Netanyahu’s longstanding claim that Iran is determined to build a nuclear weapon and that war against Iran was necessary.
President Trump, who had tried to justify the war by citing Iran’s nuclear ambitions, has been searching for a way out of it, and the quotation went viral three days after he said he was halting all attacks on Iran to give peace negotiations a chance.
“This quote was clearly crafted to drive a wedge into peace negotiations,” said Darren L. Linvill of the Media Forensics Hub at Clemson University, who tracks how disinformation and propaganda spread on social media.
Iran’s nuclear program has been a source of international concern and diplomacy for three decades, but the country’s officials have maintained that it has a civilian, not a military, focus. The status of Iran’s nuclear development remains unclear.


The spokesman for Iran’s foreign ministry, Esmail Baghaei, criticized the fake post, calling it “an example of the flood of lies against the Islamic republic.” He blamed Israel, but did not cite evidence.
“The allegations of a link to a nuclear bomb are based on the same thing, a lie they have been feeding the international community for 20 years to justify military aggression,” he told reporters on Sunday.
General Vahidi, who took over command of the Revolutionary Guards in March, has issued numerous statements about the war since it started but not about Iran’s nuclear program. Last year, he addressed the topic in an interview with state media after a 12-day conflict with Israel that culminated in American airstrikes. While Iran would “do things it has not done previously” to defend itself, he said, the country’s position on nuclear weapons “has been stated with complete clarity in the past.”
Questions about the origins of the claim were first reported by Ynet, an Israeli news outlet. Since then, new details about how it spread so widely have emerged.
The first known appearance of the quotation — on the Indian account on X — had numerous red flags. The account, which has 175,000 followers, has been criticized by fact-checkers and the government of Pakistan for sharing false and Islamophobic content.

The quotation was accompanied by a picture of General Vahidi and a cartoonish, A.I.-generated mushroom cloud. The English text contained spelling and grammatical errors.
Video

The first known appearance of the quotation was accompanied by a picture of Brig. Gen. Ahmad Vahidi and an animated mushroom cloud.CreditCredit...
Two hours later, another Indian account on X posted the same quotation, this time translated into Hindi. That account, which has 82,000 followers, had posted another fabricated quote from General Vahidi with a similar claim a week before, according to the Bodkim Project, an independent fact-checking organization in Israel.
The narrative took off globally after a post by a prominent Israeli account. “The regime is not preparing to abandon its nuclear ambitions. It is buying time. There will be no deal,” warned the account, Mossad Commentary, which shares a name with the Israeli intelligence agency but has no known connection to it.

1786933551013.png


The narrative took off globally after a post by a prominent Israeli account.
The account belongs to Gedaliah Blum, an entrepreneur who leads the Heartland Institute, an organization that organizes tours and other promotional exchanges in Israel.

Mr. Blum said in an email that he believed the quotation had come from a radio interview with General Vahidi, though he could not recall the source. He said he had posted the quotation because he believed that Iran was determined to acquire a nuclear weapon, even if there was a question about “whether those exact words were spoken.”
Half an hour later, the quotation appeared in an English-language post by Israel’s Channel 14, a privately owned, conservative television broadcaster that supports Mr. Netanyahu. That post, which claimed that it was the first time Iran had acknowledged pursuing the bomb, has been viewed more than 440,000 times.
Image
1786933638810.png


The quotation appeared in an English language post by Israel’s Channel 14, a privately owned conservative television broadcaster that supports Mr. Netanyahu.
Mr. Netanyahu’s son Yair, a podcaster and political consultant who lives near Miami, responded to the posts in Israel within minutes. Less than three hours later, the narrative appeared in his father’s speech.

“We heard today the commander of the I.R.G.C., Vahidi, explicitly declaring Iran’s intention to keep developing nuclear weapons,” the prime minister said.
A spokesman for Mr. Netanyahu did not address how a fabricated quotation had appeared in his speech that day but defended his longstanding warnings about the threat from Iran.
On Azriel, a co-founder of the Bodkim fact-checking organization in Israel, said the quotation “gained credibility every time an outlet or a politician repeated it,” feeding its spread.
In Washington, the claim was sensational — at first.
Mr. Waltz, the U.N. ambassador, reposted it. Iran was “finally admitting what’s been obvious for years,” he added.
Image
1786933675706.png

Mike Waltz, the Trump administration’s ambassador to the United Nations, reposted the quotation.

On Fox News, the anchor Bill Hemmer read the quotation during an interview with a former commander of the U.S. Central Command, Gen. Joseph L. Votel. “That’s as close to an admission as I have heard, and we’ve been watching this story for years,” Mr. Hemmer said.
Skepticism, however, soon emerged. Mr. Waltz’s post was removed from X without explanation. Neither Mr. Waltz nor the White House responded to requests for comment.
On Thursday, after inquiries from The Times, Mr. Hemmer read a statement on the air saying Fox had learned that the quote was “unverified and inaccurate.”
Image

1786933719698.png


Senator Rick Scott of Florida, a Republican, was among the U.S. leaders who reposted the quotation.
Senator Scott’s post about the claim remains online, as do the original fabrications and the tens of thousands of responses treating the fabricated quote as genuine. Senator Scott did not respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Linvill of Clemson described the spread of the claim as a textbook case of narrative laundering, a tactic that propagandists use to seed and then shuffle falsehoods through enough sources to make them seem authentic.
“It is a simple campaign,” he added, “but simple campaigns can still be very effective, and this seems to have certainly had bang for the buck.”
Steven Lee Myers covers misinformation and disinformation from San Francisco. Since joining The Times in 1989, he has reported from around the world, including Moscow, Baghdad, Beijing and Seoul.
Ronen Bergman is a staff writer for The New York Times Magazine, based in Tel Aviv.
Farnaz Fassihi is the United Nations bureau chief for The Times, leading coverage of the organization. She also covers Iran and has written about conflict in the Middle East for 15 years.



I've always been curious about why there are accounts registered to India that keep spreading fake news pandering to the propaganda of the Israeli Zionist regime. If it were just anti-China and anti-Pakistan content, I could understand that. Moreover, these accounts are clearly well-funded — it doesn't look like the work of individuals, but rather something organized. My personal guess is either that Israel outsources this work to India, or that Mossad has infiltrated India's internal operations. From a macro perspective, I can't see what benefit this brings to India, and the Indians I know also strongly dislike the Zionist regime.
 

Fatman17

Experienced member
Moderator
Pakistan Moderator
Messages
1,535
Reactions
11 1,507
Nation of residence
Pakistan
Nation of origin
Pakistan
How a False Nuclear Claim About Iran Ricocheted From India to Washington

A dubious post that spread on X became the basis of false claims that Iran’s leadership had declared it a nuclear power.


View attachment 82299
Funeral ceremonies for Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, in Tehran in July.Credit...Arash Khamooshi/Polaris for The New York Times

By Steven Lee Myers Ronen Bergman and Farnaz Fassihi
Steven Lee Myers reported from San Francisco, Ronen Bergman from Tel Aviv and Farnaz Fassihi from New York.
Aug. 16, 2026, 5:01 a.m. ET


On the morning of Aug. 5, an anonymous account on X in India posted seemingly sensational news. The commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps had vowed that his country would never give up its nuclear weapon ambitions as long as Israel and the United States possessed those weapons, the account said.
It was not true, and there’s no evidence that the commander made the remark or that Iran has developed nuclear weapons. The claim soon caromed around the internet anyway.
The quotation appeared on Israeli accounts, and then a television channel there posted it, calling it the first public declaration that Iran was working to build a nuclear bomb. That evening, it made its way into remarks that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered at Mount Herzl in Jerusalem, the country’s national cemetery.
In the United States, Mike Waltz, the Trump administration’s ambassador to the United Nations, reposted the quotation, as did Senator Rick Scott of Florida, a Republican. Fox News also reported the claim, as anchors and guests cited it as evidence of Iran’s duplicity.

The quotation, attributed to Brig. Gen. Ahmad Vahidi, was part of a campaign that succeeded in misleading politicians and news organizations around the world, according to a review by The New York Times. The claim’s spread showed how easily viral disinformation can twist the public debate over matters as serious as war and peace.
It is unclear who fabricated the quotation. However, it appeared intended to bolster Mr. Netanyahu’s longstanding claim that Iran is determined to build a nuclear weapon and that war against Iran was necessary.
President Trump, who had tried to justify the war by citing Iran’s nuclear ambitions, has been searching for a way out of it, and the quotation went viral three days after he said he was halting all attacks on Iran to give peace negotiations a chance.
“This quote was clearly crafted to drive a wedge into peace negotiations,” said Darren L. Linvill of the Media Forensics Hub at Clemson University, who tracks how disinformation and propaganda spread on social media.
Iran’s nuclear program has been a source of international concern and diplomacy for three decades, but the country’s officials have maintained that it has a civilian, not a military, focus. The status of Iran’s nuclear development remains unclear.


The spokesman for Iran’s foreign ministry, Esmail Baghaei, criticized the fake post, calling it “an example of the flood of lies against the Islamic republic.” He blamed Israel, but did not cite evidence.
“The allegations of a link to a nuclear bomb are based on the same thing, a lie they have been feeding the international community for 20 years to justify military aggression,” he told reporters on Sunday.
General Vahidi, who took over command of the Revolutionary Guards in March, has issued numerous statements about the war since it started but not about Iran’s nuclear program. Last year, he addressed the topic in an interview with state media after a 12-day conflict with Israel that culminated in American airstrikes. While Iran would “do things it has not done previously” to defend itself, he said, the country’s position on nuclear weapons “has been stated with complete clarity in the past.”
Questions about the origins of the claim were first reported by Ynet, an Israeli news outlet. Since then, new details about how it spread so widely have emerged.
The first known appearance of the quotation — on the Indian account on X — had numerous red flags. The account, which has 175,000 followers, has been criticized by fact-checkers and the government of Pakistan for sharing false and Islamophobic content.

The quotation was accompanied by a picture of General Vahidi and a cartoonish, A.I.-generated mushroom cloud. The English text contained spelling and grammatical errors.
Video

The first known appearance of the quotation was accompanied by a picture of Brig. Gen. Ahmad Vahidi and an animated mushroom cloud.CreditCredit...
Two hours later, another Indian account on X posted the same quotation, this time translated into Hindi. That account, which has 82,000 followers, had posted another fabricated quote from General Vahidi with a similar claim a week before, according to the Bodkim Project, an independent fact-checking organization in Israel.
The narrative took off globally after a post by a prominent Israeli account. “The regime is not preparing to abandon its nuclear ambitions. It is buying time. There will be no deal,” warned the account, Mossad Commentary, which shares a name with the Israeli intelligence agency but has no known connection to it.

View attachment 82300

The narrative took off globally after a post by a prominent Israeli account.
The account belongs to Gedaliah Blum, an entrepreneur who leads the Heartland Institute, an organization that organizes tours and other promotional exchanges in Israel.

Mr. Blum said in an email that he believed the quotation had come from a radio interview with General Vahidi, though he could not recall the source. He said he had posted the quotation because he believed that Iran was determined to acquire a nuclear weapon, even if there was a question about “whether those exact words were spoken.”
Half an hour later, the quotation appeared in an English-language post by Israel’s Channel 14, a privately owned, conservative television broadcaster that supports Mr. Netanyahu. That post, which claimed that it was the first time Iran had acknowledged pursuing the bomb, has been viewed more than 440,000 times.
Image
View attachment 82301

The quotation appeared in an English language post by Israel’s Channel 14, a privately owned conservative television broadcaster that supports Mr. Netanyahu.
Mr. Netanyahu’s son Yair, a podcaster and political consultant who lives near Miami, responded to the posts in Israel within minutes. Less than three hours later, the narrative appeared in his father’s speech.

“We heard today the commander of the I.R.G.C., Vahidi, explicitly declaring Iran’s intention to keep developing nuclear weapons,” the prime minister said.
A spokesman for Mr. Netanyahu did not address how a fabricated quotation had appeared in his speech that day but defended his longstanding warnings about the threat from Iran.
On Azriel, a co-founder of the Bodkim fact-checking organization in Israel, said the quotation “gained credibility every time an outlet or a politician repeated it,” feeding its spread.
In Washington, the claim was sensational — at first.
Mr. Waltz, the U.N. ambassador, reposted it. Iran was “finally admitting what’s been obvious for years,” he added.
Image
View attachment 82302
Mike Waltz, the Trump administration’s ambassador to the United Nations, reposted the quotation.

On Fox News, the anchor Bill Hemmer read the quotation during an interview with a former commander of the U.S. Central Command, Gen. Joseph L. Votel. “That’s as close to an admission as I have heard, and we’ve been watching this story for years,” Mr. Hemmer said.
Skepticism, however, soon emerged. Mr. Waltz’s post was removed from X without explanation. Neither Mr. Waltz nor the White House responded to requests for comment.
On Thursday, after inquiries from The Times, Mr. Hemmer read a statement on the air saying Fox had learned that the quote was “unverified and inaccurate.”
Image

View attachment 82303

Senator Rick Scott of Florida, a Republican, was among the U.S. leaders who reposted the quotation.
Senator Scott’s post about the claim remains online, as do the original fabrications and the tens of thousands of responses treating the fabricated quote as genuine. Senator Scott did not respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Linvill of Clemson described the spread of the claim as a textbook case of narrative laundering, a tactic that propagandists use to seed and then shuffle falsehoods through enough sources to make them seem authentic.
“It is a simple campaign,” he added, “but simple campaigns can still be very effective, and this seems to have certainly had bang for the buck.”
Steven Lee Myers covers misinformation and disinformation from San Francisco. Since joining The Times in 1989, he has reported from around the world, including Moscow, Baghdad, Beijing and Seoul.
Ronen Bergman is a staff writer for The New York Times Magazine, based in Tel Aviv.
Farnaz Fassihi is the United Nations bureau chief for The Times, leading coverage of the organization. She also covers Iran and has written about conflict in the Middle East for 15 years.



I've always been curious about why there are accounts registered to India that keep spreading fake news pandering to the propaganda of the Israeli Zionist regime. If it were just anti-China and anti-Pakistan content, I could understand that. Moreover, these accounts are clearly well-funded — it doesn't look like the work of individuals, but rather something organized. My personal guess is either that Israel outsources this work to India, or that Mossad has infiltrated India's internal operations. From a macro perspective, I can't see what benefit this brings to India, and the Indians I know also strongly dislike the Zionist regime.
India loves Israel. It has called Israel as India's fatherland.
 

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
478
Reactions
15 873
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
India loves Israel. It has called Israel as India's fatherland.
Some India people who lack sufficient understanding of reality have been deceived by the Zionists. In fact, China has long endured Mossad infiltration too, but fortunately we have successfully resisted it.

When a country falls under the control of intelligence agencies or financial conglomerates of foreigner, the fate of its people is often not good.
 

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
478
Reactions
15 873
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
1786945715214.png

This image was sent to me from the field. These are messages US servicemen in the Persian Gulf have scribbled on the dust of an aircraft flap. "Be a good guy and do what Israel tells you to" "Operation Epstein Fury" "Peace deal #64 incoming... ALL THIS FOR THE HOLY LAND" I have no frame of reference, I can't compare it to the sentiments of US soldiers in previous conflicts. But I suspect these are new sentiments, or at least a new willingness to express them this openly and directly. But as one serviceman told me: "What people in the media don't understand when they compare past conflicts to this one, is this operation has no morale behind it. That makes a world of difference to service members deployed to undesirable locations indefinitely." Read that last part again: No morale. Deployed to undesirable locations INDEFINITELY. My own conclusion: When a war has no morale behind it, winning means that you simply end it. There is no other "winning" in such an unjust war.

 

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
478
Reactions
15 873
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China

US pulls last aircraft carrier in Asia as Trump focuses on Iran, Western Hemisphere​


Trump’s war on Iran is stretching the limits of the nation’s aircraft carriers.

ByBEN FINLEY Associated Press and DIDI TANG Associated Press
August 15, 2026, 8:37 PM


WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump's war against Iran is stretching the limits of U.S. aircraft carriers and leaving the western Pacific without one of the key American warships as China shows more signs of aggression.

The USS George Washington is departing the Pacific and expected to replace the USS Abraham Lincoln in the Middle East amid growing concerns about mental health and supply issues aboard the long-deployed carrier. The Lincoln has had its time at sea extended from its original May return date to support operations against Iran.

The lack of a U.S. carrier in the Pacific may be short-lived if the Navy deploys another in the next couple of months. But it shows how the open-ended operations with Iran are running some American sailors ragged, analysts say, while the Trump administration further retreats from the Asia-Pacific region and focuses on the Western Hemisphere.

“The administration says that the Pacific is supposed to be the most important behind the Western Hemisphere,” said Greg Poling, director of the Southeast Asia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Instead, the U.S. is "doing the exact opposite" of its previously expressed goal of pulling out of the Middle East.

American allies in the Pacific are unsettled over the unpredictability of the Republican administration, Poling said, while Beijing “is quite happy with U.S. distraction, with the frustration of U.S. allies and partners."

Beijing sees the U.S. military presence in the region as a threat to China’s rise and an obstacle to its ambition to seize Taiwan, the self-governing island it claims as its own. But the United States has argued that the Pacific region is too important economically to lose.

No one expects China to invade Taiwan because an American aircraft carrier has left the region. But the carrier's absence gives the Chinese another opportunity to show its strength, said Bryan Clark, a former Navy submariner who is a defense analyst at the Hudson Institute.

“They’re using this as part of the narrative to demonstrate to the Philippines, to Japan, to Indonesia and others that the U.S. is not the big dog in the western Pacific anymore,” Clark said. “They would just prefer that countries in the region decide that China is the bigger power and the U.S. is not able to guarantee their security anymore.”

China conducted naval exercises this week with Indonesia and recently has shown signs of aggression toward Japan and the Philippines, two key U.S. allies that also have territorial disputes with Beijing.

China carried out military drills this month near the Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea. Both China and the Philippines have claims over the shoal. Last month, a Chinese guided-missile destroyer conducted a live-fire exercise off Japan’s southernmost island of Okinotori.

Adm. Frank Bradley, head of the U.S. Special Operations Command, has been trying to reassure regional allies of Washington’s commitment. He was in Manila on Thursday, telling his Filipino counterparts that U.S. special operations forces are ready to step up joint exercises to strengthen the countries' alliance. He also is expected to travel to Japan.

Evan Sankey, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute who focuses on U.S. policy toward China, said aircraft carriers provide psychological assurance to U.S. allies. The absence of carriers in the region, he said, “adds to the general sense that the U.S. is distracted by events in the Middle East.”

Trump has relied heavily on aircraft carriers to support military operations during his second term. For example, the USS Gerald R. Ford returned home in mid-May after an 11-month deployment, the longest since the Vietnam War, during which it supported the U.S. fight against Iran and the capture of Venezuela's then-leader, Nicolás Maduro.

The Ford had experienced a fire in a laundry space that forced the carrier to turn around and return to the Mediterranean Sea for repairs and left hundreds of sailors without places to sleep. Meanwhile, the Lincoln has spent a record uninterrupted time at sea of more than 240 days. Democratic lawmakers have been calling for investigations and greater visibility into conditions aboard the ship.

Warships and their crews can only handle so much, said Robert Farley, who teaches national security and diplomacy at the University of Kentucky and often writes about aircraft carriers.

“People don’t get enough rest. It's psychologically exhausting. And R&R is part of keeping the crew healthy,” Farley said. “Sometimes it’s framed as, ‘These people haven’t had a vacation.’ But we are dealing with well-known limits on the capacity of a crew to operate at top efficiency over time. And that just declines."

Clark, of the Hudson Institute, said the squeeze on the nation's aircraft carriers stems from the lack of preparation and planning for the Iran war.

“If we were going to mobilize to do this kind of conflict, and we anticipated it might go this long, we might have done some changes to the carrier schedule to make sure more would be available,” Clark said.

Clark said the Navy has 11 aircraft carriers and typically deploys two or three at a time. But it could soon deploy four if the USS Theodore Roosevelt leaves San Diego for the Middle East, allowing the Washington to return to Pacific.

But the massive warships will need maintenance, likely causing a bottleneck at the nation's only two carrier shipyards.

“We’ll end up with a maintenance debt that needs to be paid for the next few years,” Clark said. “We’ll probably have less carrier presence than we’ve had in the previous years because carriers will be lined up to get into the shipyard.”

Michael Swaine, a senior research fellow in the Quincy Institute’s East Asia Program, questions the future need for aircraft carriers as warfare rapidly changes.

Carriers can be more easily targeted with drones and missiles, particularly by an adversary such as China, Swaine said, while smaller ships and submarines can be as effective in striking targets as the fighter jets that launch off a carrier.

Top Navy officials have indicated a desire to move away from a heavy reliance on carriers. Adm. Daryl Caudle, chief of naval operations, told The Associated Press in February that he wants to convince commanders to use smaller, newer ships and other assets instead of consistently turning to huge aircraft carriers.




When a gambler has just left the pawnshop.
 

Fatman17

Experienced member
Moderator
Pakistan Moderator
Messages
1,535
Reactions
11 1,507
Nation of residence
Pakistan
Nation of origin
Pakistan
Some India people who lack sufficient understanding of reality have been deceived by the Zionists. In fact, China has long endured Mossad infiltration too, but fortunately we have successfully resisted it.

When a country falls under the control of intelligence agencies or financial conglomerates of foreigner, the fate of its people is often not good.
This statement was made by PM Modi
 

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom