İ wish we would have their destroyers.
Turkey's likeliest threats/opponents are all fairly close to/neighbouring it (EEZ etc).
Thus frigates and corvettes will give you the most suitable weapon + sensor max capacity/projection by way of more raw (surface) hulls available (compared to destroyers and cruisers etc which sink in lot more capital cost and resource into 1 hull).
Consider the context of "one in three" (w.r.t rewarding raw hull numbers in this case) I go into here:
A state-of-the-art guided missile stealth frigate was launched in Kolkata today and will soon join the fleet of Indian Navy. Called Himgiri, this is the first of the three Stealth Frigates ordered in 2015 at the cost of ₹ 19,293 crore. The frigate was launched two months ahead of schedule, said...
defencehub.live
You sacrifice the long endurance of destroyers (to get more ships per resource unit available), but that is good compromise Turkey has done if you ask me...given its geography and Mavi Vatan.
Japan has its particular (different to turkey) defence strategy to consider given pacific ocean right on its shores literally.
Consider also the massive growing power projection of PLAN into this ocean to get well past its earlier relative greenwater containment by 1st island chain and tech + resource differential during cold war era...with their planning oriented towards addressing USN domination here.
Thus extra endurance on some ships is naturally factored in more and rewarded by their (JMSDF) planners....to best augment with the overall allied strategy with USN.
@anmdt @Cabatli_53 @Saithan @Test7 @Kartal1 @Madokafc @xenon5434 @Webslave