TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

[HKY]

Super şimşek is a great platform for different tasks. But it has to be made to fit internal bays of anka3 and Kaan so it could be used effectively without giving up stealth.

 

[Huelague]

Super şimşek is a great platform for different tasks. But it has to be made to fit internal bays of anka3 and Kaan so it could be used effectively without giving up stealth.

Than they need retractable wings.

 

[Mis_TR_Like]

Imagine K2 armed with AVCI or another Skydagger drone that's been programmed to hunt down HVTs such as parked aircraft...

Whereas TB2 was designed to launch munitions from a distance, K2 is supposed to get up close to do its work (for obvious reasons). This also means that it's a good platform to launch small drones from, meaning that if a few K2s approached an airbase they could disperse enough small drones to destroy all parked aircraft.

The problem with Iran's Shahed strikes is that they target the coordinates of an airbase without actually discriminating where the aircraft are parked. You can program small quadrocopter drones to identify parked planes, helicopters, etc.

Once air defences are depleted, every single aircraft becomes a sitting duck if you send in K2s armed with quadrocopters.

This type of concept could be further improved upon, but I don't want to give out any ideas

 

[boredaf]

Imagine K2 armed with AVCI or another Skydagger drone that's been programmed to hunt down HVTs such as parked aircraft...

Whereas TB2 was designed to launch munitions from a distance, K2 is supposed to get up close to do its work (for obvious reasons). This also means that it's a good platform to launch small drones from, meaning that if a few K2s approached an airbase they could disperse enough small drones to destroy all parked aircraft.

The problem with Iran's Shahed strikes is that they target the coordinates of an airbase without actually discriminating where the aircraft are parked. You can program small quadrocopter drones to identify parked planes, helicopters, etc.

Once air defences are depleted, every single aircraft becomes a sitting duck if you send in K2s armed with quadrocopters.

This type of concept could be further improved upon, but I don't want to give out any ideas

Every kg you add K2 would be removed from its payload, so what you're suggesting is lowering its payload which would lead to lowering the area it would be able to effect. And, those quad you want to put would destroy its flight profile. Not only would they cause significant drag, lowering its maximum range, they would also destroy its profile and make it far more visible to a radar. This is a slow platform, best defence it has is being unnoticed for as long as possible and it gets this from its shape and materials. Also, at the range K2 might be used, there is no way to control short range drones, so they would have to be completely autonomous which is so far not a thing.

And, it is unnecessary, 200 kg warhead is massive. Depending on the type of explosive, how they made the casing or fragmentation sleeve and its material and whether it explodes in the air or on impact, it could have a massive effective range that would render any aircraft in a massive radius an operational kill at the very least.

 

[Lool]

That 300km+ is its speed right? Anti-drone drone i guess

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2034020785308766262

Is it true that Skydagger is owned by Baykar?

 

[MonteCarlo]

Is it true that Skydagger is owned by Baykar?

From what I understand not exactly owned by the Baykar the company but Haluk Bayraktar has a sizeable stake in it. Their CEO called themselves "little sister company of Baykar" in a recent interview

 

[boredaf]

Does anyone know when Baykar changed the MTOW of KE? I remember it being 6 tons but I just looked and it is changed to 8.5 tons and its endurance is reduced to 3 hours from 5. And looking at earlier reports, operational altitude is reduce to 25k feet from 35k.

Edit: I should point out that the payload capacity haven't changed, it is still 1.5 tons, so it isn't a payload increase, it is a structural increase of 2 tons.

 

[uçuyorum]

Than they need retractable wings.

Unlikely

Does anyone know when Baykar changed the MTOW of KE? I remember it being 6 tons but I just looked and it is changed to 8.5 tons and its endurance is reduced to 3 hours from 5. And looking at earlier reports, operational altitude is reduce to 25k feet from 35k.

Edit: I should point out that the payload capacity haven't changed, it is still 1.5 tons, so it isn't a payload increase, it is a structural increase of 2 tons.

Well, more internal systems I guess, not just structurals. Like toygun and cooling etc

 

[Mis_TR_Like]

Imagine K2 armed with AVCI or another Skydagger drone that's been programmed to hunt down HVTs such as parked aircraft...

Whereas TB2 was designed to launch munitions from a distance, K2 is supposed to get up close to do its work (for obvious reasons). This also means that it's a good platform to launch small drones from, meaning that if a few K2s approached an airbase they could disperse enough small drones to destroy all parked aircraft.

The problem with Iran's Shahed strikes is that they target the coordinates of an airbase without actually discriminating where the aircraft are parked. You can program small quadrocopter drones to identify parked planes, helicopters, etc.

Once air defences are depleted, every single aircraft becomes a sitting duck if you send in K2s armed with quadrocopters.

This type of concept could be further improved upon, but I don't want to give out any ideas

SKYDAGGER General Manager Mehmet Öztekin announced that they are working on a new concept for KIZILELMA as part of the collaboration with BAYKAR.

'Perhaps 20–30 small drones will emerge from KIZILELMA. These systems will be capable of operating in swarms'

'Our goal is to extend this structure starting from KALKAN to TB2, TB3, AKINCI, and in the future to KIZILELMA'

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2035640397653770257

 

[boredaf]

SKYDAGGER General Manager Mehmet Öztekin announced that they are working on a new concept for KIZILELMA as part of the collaboration with BAYKAR.

'Perhaps 20–30 small drones will emerge from KIZILELMA. These systems will be capable of operating in swarms'

'Our goal is to extend this structure starting from KALKAN to TB2, TB3, AKINCI, and in the future to KIZILELMA'

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2035640397653770257

And what exactly is the point of filling a stealth fighter drone with short range drones? Bringing KE within a range that would allow those small drones to find targets would also put it right in the range of any and all AA enemy has.

 

[Mis_TR_Like]

And what exactly is the point of filling a stealth fighter drone with short range drones? Bringing KE within a range that would allow those small drones to find targets would also put it right in the range of any and all AA enemy has.

Well yes you're right, but depends on the situation. Before putting KE anywhere near somewhere like an airbase you'd probably wipe out all the AA you can. But it is definitely a valid criticism (especially as KE was suggested by the general manager).

Hence why I suggested K2 as a good platform for such a role. To be fair TB2 and Akinci could do the same, but K2 is designed to get up close and sacrifice itself, so it would be a good choice.

 

[boredaf]

Well yes you're right, but depends on the situation. Before putting KE anywhere near somewhere like an airbase you'd probably wipe out all the AA you can. But it is definitely a valid criticism (especially as KE was suggested by the general manager).

Hence why I suggested K2 as a good platform for such a role. To be fair TB2 and Akinci could do the same, but K2 is designed to get up close and sacrifice itself, so it would be a good choice.

Mate, it is completely unnecessary, not just for KE but all of them. Why would you want to destroy K2's flight performance and silhouette on radars, as well as either lower its range by sacrificing its fuel or lower its warhead weight? Because when you put quads on it, every kg you put on will be subtracted from either from its fuel or from its warhead and those quads will increase the drag profile of the drone causing it to have shorter range in the first place AND make it far more visible to radar. Putting drones with 10 to 15 km range and few kgs of warheads on platforms that cost millions, or a platform that already has 200 kg of warhead makes zero sense.

This fascination with quads is really weird. They have their uses in the frontline there is no question about that, but they are utterly unnecessary for targeting some place like enemy airbase unless you already have troops behind enemy lines that can control them. Not to mention, despite all the videos you might see from Ukraine, their failure rate is utterly immense. Most of the drones they use do nothing at all, you are seeing perhaps 15 out of a 100 drones. and that is on the frontlines.

Edit: Also, if you have wiped out all the AA you don't need KE to drop those drones then. If you can do that, you can literally walk in. And still it would be dangerous because you cannot know there isn't a soldiers with a MANPADS targeting KE. It is an unnecessary risk with little gain. Just flavour of the month stuff.

 

[Strong AI]

And what exactly is the point of filling a stealth fighter drone with short range drones? Bringing KE within a range that would allow those small drones to find targets would also put it right in the range of any and all AA enemy has.

Mate, it is completely unnecessary, not just for KE but all of them. Why would you want to destroy K2's flight performance and silhouette on radars, as well as either lower its range by sacrificing its fuel or lower its warhead weight? Because when you put quads on it, every kg you put on will be subtracted from either from its fuel or from its warhead and those quads will increase the drag profile of the drone causing it to have shorter range in the first place AND make it far more visible to radar. Putting drones with 10 to 15 km range and few kgs of warheads on platforms that cost millions, or a platform that already has 200 kg of warhead makes zero sense.

This fascination with quads is really weird. They have their uses in the frontline there is no question about that, but they are utterly unnecessary for targeting some place like enemy airbase unless you already have troops behind enemy lines that can control them. Not to mention, despite all the videos you might see from Ukraine, their failure rate is utterly immense. Most of the drones they use do nothing at all, you are seeing perhaps 15 out of a 100 drones. and that is on the frontlines.

Edit: Also, if you have wiped out all the AA you don't need KE to drop those drones then. If you can do that, you can literally walk in. And still it would be dangerous because you cannot know there isn't a soldiers with a MANPADS targeting KE. It is an unnecessary risk with little gain. Just flavour of the month stuff.

Don't get misleaded by that sh*tty illustration. Imo Baykar plans more like this concept tested years ago by the U.S Navy.

3D printed Perdix drones

www.technologyreview.com/2017/01/10/154651/a-100-drone-swarm-dropped-from-jets-plans-its-own-moves/amp/

 

[boredaf]

Don't get misleaded by that sh*tty illustration. Imo Baykar plans more like this concept tested years ago by the U.S Navy.

3D printed Perdix drones

View attachment 79628

www.technologyreview.com/2017/01/10/154651/a-100-drone-swarm-dropped-from-jets-plans-its-own-moves/amp/

My point still stands, what are you going to achieve by releasing a swarm of drones that doesn't even weigh half a kilo? If you notice, they are not even talking about a range there nor any payload. And that article is almost 10 years old mate and I can't find a single proper source that isn't quoting this or showing what it can really do.

 

[Strong AI]

My point still stands, what are you going to achieve by releasing a swarm of drones that doesn't even weigh half a kilo? If you notice, they are not even talking about a range there nor any payload. And that article is almost 10 years old mate and I can't find a single proper source that isn't quoting this or showing what it can really do.

Who said they will release half kilo drones? I am talking about that concept. Look at that drones shape, like a glide bomb. So imagine one KE can release 20 drones with 5 kg explosives, which first can glide like 50 km and then can fly another 100 km on its own. The concept is the main point.

 

[boredaf]

Who said they will release half kilo drones? I am talking about that concept. Look at that drones shape, like a glide bomb. So imagine one KE can release 20 drones with 5 kg explosives, which first can glide like 50 km and then can fly another 100 km on its own. The concept is the main point.

If they glide 50 km they will be losing altitude constantly, then will have to climb again and a drone that is carrying 5 kg explosive plus an engine and batteries that can fly it for 100 km (as well as its airframe, and any electronics and sensor so that it can find its way) is not just going to weigh 5 kg and it'll need 2 or 3 meter length wings. Where exactly are you planning to carry 20 drones like that?