UK's New Strategic Initiative: Turkey

Balamir

Well-known member
Messages
351
Reactions
1,370
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
ANALYSIS - Why the UK sees Turkey as a crucial post-Brexit ally

*The writer is a researcher and journalist focusing on conflict and geopolitics in the Middle East and North Africa, primarily related to the Gulf region.

ISTANBUL

After the United Kingdom’s transitional period to leave the European Union (EU) officially concluded on Jan. 1 after a year of tense negotiations, Boris Johnson’s Conservative government managed to forge a trade deal with the EU. While the deal is considered relatively favorable considering the past financial risks of a no-deal Brexit, and the UK still retains some economic benefits with the EU, Britain has still sought to advance its trade ties beyond Europe.

As the UK has looked towards its traditional non-EU allies, one new stronger ally that has stood out is Turkey, with London seeking stronger economic ties with Ankara. Both countries agreed on a historic trade deal on Dec. 29, prior to the UK’s formal withdrawal from the EU, which Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan called Turkey’s most important trade deal since its 1995 Customs Union with the EU.

“God willing, we are entering a new phase in which both Turkey and the UK will benefit,” President Erdogan said.

Prior to the deal, UK Trade Secretary Liz Truss said she hoped to pursue “tariff-free trading arrangements and will help support our trading relationship,” adding that the upcoming deal would “provide certainty for thousands of jobs across the UK in the manufacturing, automotive and steel industries.”

The deal secures existing trade ties which were worth $25.2 billion USD in 2019, including Turkey’s exports to the UK — which are mostly precious metals, vehicles, textiles, and electrical equipment. Britain is Turkey’s second-largest export partner, after Germany.

As two previously close allies, the deal benefits their trade ties, as it eliminates tariffs on exports and therefore prevents financial losses on them.

Such an agreement had long been anticipated. Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said in early July last year that a UK-Turkey trade deal was “very close”, during a visit to London to meet his counterpart, Dominic Raab.

It also increases the prospect of Turkey and the UK forging even stronger economic ties during the upcoming decade. From an economic perspective, securing this deal highly benefits Britain, due to Turkey’s position as a strong economy among its non-EU allies.

The two countries have developed strong relations in the last decade, particularly as the UK backed Turkey’s efforts in the fight against the so-called Islamic State (Daesh). Britain also offered Turkey its sympathy after the foiled coup attempt in 2016, which it criticized as an “attack against Turkey’s democracy”, while other EU states did not offer such support.

Amid the UK’s ascent away from the EU since the 2016 Brexit referendum, it has diverted from other EU member states’ stance. For instance, as France and Germany halted arms sales to Turkey following the counter-terrorism Operation Peace Spring in 2019 against the PKK-linked YPG faction in northern Syria, the UK continued its weapons supplies, and did not criticize Turkey as other countries did.

Moreover, France developed a more antagonistic foreign policy towards Turkey, particularly due to differences in the Eastern Mediterranean and Libya’s conflict — as Ankara aided the internationally-recognized Government of National Accord (GNA) against the Paris-backed warlord Khalifa Haftar’s putsch.

In fact, France withdrew from a NATO naval mission along the Eastern Mediterranean last July — an initiative that was also designed to secure the arms embargo on Libya. Paris was largely motivated by undermining Turkey after it had effectively hindered its geopolitical ambitions.

Clearly, while the UK’s withdrawal from the EU enables it to align itself closer with Turkey, other NATO countries have tried to use NATO as a weapon to pressure Turkey. Even Donald Trump previously imposed sanctions on Turkey, while President-elect Joe Biden made comments in his presidential campaign that he would consider supporting the opposition in Turkey. This understandably caused outrage in Ankara, with the Turkish government slamming Biden’s comments as “interventionist”.

Compared to other powerful Western states, the UK is clearly the closest and most receptive ally of Turkey, which creates the framework for them to establish an even stronger alliance.

Meanwhile, as Boris Johnson’s government promoted the narrative of a post-Brexit Britain achieving a more independent foreign policy, free from any EU constraints, Turkey would be further seen as a convenient ally, given its geostrategic importance near Europe, the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, the Levant and the wider Middle East.

The UK may look to use this to maintain its desired regional influence. Boris Johnson’s government has already sought to uphold its foreign policy influence through other traditional allies, such as Bahrain, where it has a key naval base that helps Britain project military influence in the Middle East. Securing a partnership with Turkey would give Britain further leverage to maintain influence in these regions.

This could also lead to greater cooperation between Ankara and London in the Eastern Mediterranean. Britain may see Turkey as a useful ally in this endeavor, as it may seek to control and exert influence over shipping lanes through the Suez Canal. This is part of Britain’s desire to revive some of the geopolitical control it had in the past, particularly in the Levant and Egypt, while it still also hosts a military presence in [the island of] Cyprus.

It could create an opportunity for further proactive foreign policy decision-making. For instance, though Britain has taken a more withdrawn position in the conflict in Libya, it has more potential to work with Turkey, which has backed the internationally-recognized Government of National Accord (GNA). Therefore, this could create a more effective partnership should London and Ankara work together and could help further advance peace in that country. This is one example of potentially positive foreign policy collaboration between the two countries.

However, a post-Brexit Britain will likely play a more reserved foreign policy role for the time being, as shown by its cutting off foreign aid last November. Yet its deals with both Turkey and the EU show that it can effectively play a balancing act between the two. Additionally, Brexit has been a catalyst for stronger ties between Turkey and Britain and should further boost their relations for years to come, making Ankara even more of a strategic and economically important ally for London.



*Opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Anadolu Agency.

 
Last edited:

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
3,451
Reactions
14 9,116
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
3002.jpg
 

Balamir

Well-known member
Messages
351
Reactions
1,370
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Panel foresees strong Turkey-UK post-Brexit cooperation


Stronger cooperation should see creation of new platform alternative to EU, online webinar hears 21.01.2021

The future relationship between Turkey and the UK in post-Brexit era can pave the way to new partnerships in various fields in the Middle East, Africa and beyond, a panel heard Wednesday.

An online webinar organized by the Circle Foundation underlined the possible growth of cooperation between the two countries and underlined that ways to create a new platform, which would be alternative to the EU, should be looked at.

The panel discussing the future relationships was attended by Turkey’s former Economy Minister Nihat Zeybekci, Co-Chair of All Parliamentary Group for Turkey Lord Mark McInnes, Conservative MP Daniel Kawczynski , British Ambassador to Turkey Sir Dominick Chilcott and Dr Yaprak Gursoy, a senior lecturer of politics and international relations from Aston University.

Moderating the panel, McInnes said being a member of the EU did not permit the UK to establish and develop relationships at a desired level with other countries before the Brexit but in the new era there is potential of improving ties with many countries, including Turkey.

He also pointed out the situation of Uighur Muslims in China and said he was looking forward a partnership with Turkey to defend human rights across the world.

Cooperation in Middle East, Africa

Former Turkish minister Zeybekci said the UK has been a very important country for Turkish exports, adding there was a huge volume of trade even in 2020 during the pandemic.

Before Brexit, the exports from Turkey to the UK were limited, because of the customs union but that hindrance no longer exists, he said.

Underlining Turkey’s construction companies’ recent success across the world, Zeybekci emphasized that Turkey and the UK could develop joint projects in many places, including Africa and the Middle East.

The former economy minister also said the two countries could cooperate in energy field.

New platform

Conservative MP and chief envoy of eastern Europe Daniel Kawczynski said the “supremacy of NATO in Europe should be maintained,” adding that a proposed European army would undermine the alliance.

Kawczynski praised Turkey for hosting millions of refugees and pointed out the importance of Turkey for NATO.

“No country in the world has done to help the refugee crisis in Syria” more than Turkey, Kawczynski said.

He said UK and Turkey are now non-EU members but they belong to NATO, such as Norway and Iceland, adding that an alternative platform to the EU should be created. He said he hopes that “Turkey would join Britain in doing so.”

Positive perceptions

Presenting an analytical outlook of perceptions in both countries on each other, Yaprak Gursoy said they may play a huge part in future relationship between the two countries.

Positive perceptions in both countries would pave the way for a positive cooperation in the future, Gursoy added.

Good ground for cooperation

Britain’s Ambassador to Ankara Sir Dominick Chilcott said the UK government was exploring how it can use its new role in the world in post-Brexit era.

Underlining that Turkey and the UK have many common points for cooperation, Chilcott said there is “good ground” to be hopeful for new cooperation between the two countries.

He said the Free Trade Agreement signed with Turkey will cover areas such as fresh agricultural products services, digital area, public procurement and “if we succeed in signing a comprehensive agreement,” relationship between the two countries would grow stronger.

Chilcott said Turkey has been “underappreciated for doing our dirty work,” reminding the country’s significance during the cold war era.

“Turkey is the last stable democracy when you head east,” he said, adding it is able to absorb a lot of instability from neighboring countries.

The ambassador said that Turkish army’s presence in northern Syria “prevents humanitarian catastrophe” and Turkey does not only protect lives of millions of refugees within its borders but also of those in Syria. Turkey also helps in counterterrorism efforts as it fights against Daesh/ISIS.

He said there will be benefits for both countries in deeper cooperation in post-Brexit era.

Visas

Chilcott said the UK has moved to a Australian-style “point-based” immigration system and in the future, Turkish people would be judged fairer in their applications for visas.

He said the number of those from the EU will drop after the end of free movement with Brexit and countries like Turkey would take advantage in receiving visas for business reasons.

Speaking on the same subject, Kawczynski criticized the UK visa policies, saying they were “racist” over the last decades.

He said he found the policies racist because they gave Bulgarian citizens an automatic right to come to the UK, because of the EU membership, but prevent those who would like to come from neighboring Turkey.

Gursoy said it is important for Turkish students and businesspeople to be able to come to the UK without the visa and such a move from Britain would help reducing negative perceptions in Turkey.

The Circle Foundation is a London-based non-profit and independent think-tank aiming to empower the Turkish speaking diaspora through creating a platform for political integration, civic and democratic participation.
 

Barry

Contributor
Messages
640
Reactions
1,611
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Northern Cyprus
Those are(some examples)?

Turkey was the prime bogeyman in the Brexit propaganda here.

They would constantly bring up:

Turkey's population (various figures)
Turkey is full of Muslims and brown people
The possibility of terrorism
Saying Turkey has 12 million criminals waiting to come to the UK via free movement of people.
Turks were coming for your jobs and women
That the UK was paying Turkey 1 billion to join the EU via misuse of EU funds
Britain's new border would be with Syria and Iraq when Turkey joined
Turkey is a major drugs and terrorist gateway into the EU
hUmAn RIgHtS AbuSeS
What about the KURRRRRRDDDDS?
Armenian Genocide

The UK literally went full racist hate against you, and everyone here went along with it, even supposed white liberal leftists who abhorred racism. When it's against you, it's alright though. You have no friend in the UK.

To stay on topic, there's no new deal signed, it's a continuity agreement that keeps the current trade deals in place until they can find a way to exploit you again later.
 

Mustafa27

Committed member
Messages
215
Reactions
2 588
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Turkey was the prime bogeyman in the Brexit propaganda here.

They would constantly bring up:

Turkey's population (various figures)
Turkey is full of Muslims and brown people
The possibility of terrorism
Saying Turkey has 12 million criminals waiting to come to the UK via free movement of people.
Turks were coming for your jobs and women
That the UK was paying Turkey 1 billion to join the EU via misuse of EU funds
Britain's new border would be with Syria and Iraq when Turkey joined
Turkey is a major drugs and terrorist gateway into the EU
hUmAn RIgHtS AbuSeS
What about the KURRRRRRDDDDS?
Armenian Genocide

The UK literally went full racist hate against you, and everyone here went along with it, even supposed white liberal leftists who abhorred racism. When it's against you, it's alright though. You have no friend in the UK.

To stay on topic, there's no new deal signed, it's a continuity agreement that keeps the current trade deals in place until they can find a way to exploit you again later.
tbh uk is racist against everybody else. As long as our interests align we should work together, i honestly don't care about anything else.
 

Barry

Contributor
Messages
640
Reactions
1,611
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Northern Cyprus
tbh uk is racist against everybody else. As long as our interests align we should work together, i honestly don't care about anything else.

Sure, but we went above and beyond when it came to Turkey.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
3,950
Reactions
5 4,146
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Dont take it personally, mates. Lets take what we needs from Brits.
 

KKF 2.0

Well-known member
Messages
354
Reactions
825
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Turkey was the prime bogeyman in the Brexit propaganda here.

I beg to differ. I followed the entire Brexit adventure closely and the main argument was without a doubt the European grasp on British sovereignty.

I vividly remember a Bengali guy from London asking why his uncle - who is an oncology expert - can't even travel through the UK without a transit visa while Eastern European gypsies are flooding England. Of course, he expressed himself in a PC way but this was the gist of his statement and I do believe he's right.


Turkey was not a leading argument during the Brexit debate in the UK.
 
Last edited:

Balamir

Well-known member
Messages
351
Reactions
1,370
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
There is a fact that does not go unnoticed and that Britain's exit from the EU is not a temporary policy. He wants to throw 50 years of dust on England and become a real "empire" again. It develops leading defense strategies like TEMPEST. We will see in the future whether it is making an effort to form a union, but it wants to enter the Middle East, Africa and even Central Asia. For this, Turkey 's bi sees as key. However, it will still avoid any conflict of interest with the USA. I put the last analysis of George Friedman, who made effective and accurate analysis and predictions on geopolitical issues. Good reading.
 

Balamir

Well-known member
Messages
351
Reactions
1,370
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Britain Returns to Its Past​

George Friedman

January 5, 2021

As of Jan. 1, Britain has completed the process of leaving the European Union. The EU has assured all that dire consequences will haunt the British. Certainly, there will be economic consequences for the U.K., but it is hard to imagine that the departure of the second-largest economy in Europe will not have significant consequences for Europe as well. At minimum, the completion of Britain’s departure shatters a myth about the European Union. The name “European Union” had become synonymous with “Europe.” This was never a true equivalency, as there were European nations excluded from and uninterested in membership like Switzerland and Norway, which chose a non-member relationship. But with Britain on the outside, the sense that the EU speaks for Europe is gone. Britain is a foundational part of Europe, one of Europe’s liberators in World War II and, beginning with the Roman invasion of England, Europe’s occasional enemy and savior. Britain has been a defining force in Europe, and now it has left the European Union. This will challenge the bloc in many ways, the first being that the EU is no longer interchangeable with Europe. Now there is another Europe: Britain.
Since the referendum, there have been two issues. The first was whether British opponents of Brexit could overthrow the result of the referendum. The second was whether the EU could, without appearing excessively conciliatory to the rest of the European Union. At times these two forces seemed to work together to block Brexit. In the end they failed, although Brussels is likely to continue to seek to impose pain, until the British stop buying Mercedes cars in favor of Lexus. At that point the central power of Europe, Germany, will put an end to punitive measures, and the EU will move on.
The real issue now is Britain defining its place in the world. It is a strange one. There is little warfare in Europe at the moment, and little to fear from European powers militarily. This is an odd situation to be in. Between 1945 and 1991, Britain faced the Soviet threat. From 1914 to 1945, Britain faced the German threat, with a truce in between. Now, what threat there is is distant and theoretical. Britain remains a member of NATO, not really a European entity even if most of its members are European. The United States provides the potential military power to NATO, and Britain is one of the few European nations to possess significant military force, and even global reach, at the core of NATO.
The U.S. was allied in war with Britain in World War I and II, the Cold War, Desert Storm, Iraq and Afghanistan. Some of these wars may not have been wise, but they cemented relations between the militaries. For the continental European countries, shattered by the world wars and terrified by the Cold War, the primary issue is a focus on the economy and the avoidance of conflict. Britain sits across the English Channel, facing a region that has historically drawn it into conflicts but for a millennium failed to invade Britain. Britain’s history has been shaped by the need to intervene in Europe due to its fragmentation. What is inconceivable to Europe is a historical reality to Britain.
Britain’s problem is that it cannot control the evolution of Europe by itself. In World War II, the United States stripped Britain of its empire, and limited both its force and its reach. The British resented U.S. postwar policy, but they lived with it, Britain being a master of living with the inevitable. It aligned itself with the United States, and on the whole, it worked out well. During the Falklands War, it was U.S. satellite imagery given to Britain that enabled a rapid victory. In recent wars, Americans and the British fought together with an ease that neither had enjoyed with other countries. From military to intelligence operations, the two countries were as closely aligned as sovereign nations can permit themselves. Regardless of how stiff-necked the U.S. was on the empire, the two countries fought a century of wars together against the Germans and in spite of friction with the French or other allies. Recently, the British sent an aircraft carrier to the Western Pacific in support of U.S. operations.
The alliance of the British and Americans goes deeper than this. Together they form part of the Five Eyes, a grouping of five states – the others are Australia, Canada and New Zealand – committed to sharing intelligence. Military cooperation is valuable but not extraordinary. The willingness of these five countries to see the intelligence gathered by any of them is extraordinary. It also follows military cooperation. Canadians alternate with Americans in commanding the North American Aerospace Defense Command. The Australians operate in the same region as China. The New Zealanders with minimal force and far more caution share intelligence. But all five of these countries fought in the world wars and other conflicts.
When asking the question of where Britain is, the following answers arise. First, trade is important, but the North American markets are as large as the EU. Second, Europe is highly unpredictable and frequently volatile, while Britain’s presence in NATO keeps it in Europe alongside the United States, and therefore with weight. Finally, the Five Eyes, descendants of Britain who evolved to their own satisfaction, focuses these nations on something that is frequently more important than anything: war and its prevention through intelligence.
The Irish, Scottish and Welsh issues are likely to be contained, but for now I make this argument. Britain is no longer the ruler of a global empire. It cannot live with Europe, but it must align with others. The Five Eyes, as an intelligence and military alignment, is already in place and need not be negotiated. The alliance is sufficiently loose that no one is obligated to do more than share intelligence. It is also bound by history. And those five nations can be a force to be reckoned with, as well as a market already shared and readily opened. And each nation has an interest in it.
One must never be too enthusiastic. Friction is the nature of the beast. But this alliance is already in place, and extending it to economics (with many free trade agreements already in place) is the logical next step.

 
Top Bottom