Live Conflict War in Afghanistan

[guest_07]

Its been something watching people online care more about women's rights in Afghanistan over 20 years of occupation and war crimes

Before, Taliban was not winning.
That is why no want care.
& no want care about the woman.

Once Taliban liberated Afghanistan,
suddenly, many become woman right champion.


The agenda is not about woman.
Its about to tarnish Taliban's reputation
as worst as possible.

 

[Jackdaws]

Its been something watching people online care more about women's rights in Afghanistan over 20 years of occupation and war crimes

Children rights too. Not too long ago, the Taliban entered a school and killed a whole bunch of kids in Pakistan. The hypocrisy on display is astounding. While cheering on the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan, the cheerleaders don't want the Taliban taking over their own lands.

 

[guest_07]

Children rights too. Not too long ago, the Taliban entered a school and killed a whole bunch of kids in Pakistan. The hypocrisy on display is astounding. While cheering on the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan, the cheerleaders don't want the Taliban taking over their own lands.

Do you mean this?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Peshawar_school_massacre

Another attempt of slander
on Taliban (Afghanistan).

Not tired in making a slander, right?

 

[Jackdaws]

Do you mean this?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Peshawar_school_massacre

Another attempt of slander
on Taliban (Afghanistan).

Not tired in making a slander, right?

Oh, it's a slander? Glad you see the humor in dead kids. I don't.

 

[guest_07]

Oh, it's a slander? Glad you see the humor in dead kids. I don't.

The humour is on the ignorant people
that always making a slander.

 

[Jackdaws]

The humour is on the ignorant people
that always making a slander.

Humour? What's so funny about dead kids?

 

[guest_07]

Humour? What's so funny about dead kids?

Since you don't understand
my simple message,
I stop my conversation here.
Have a nice day.

 

[Ryder]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1427041653970280448

Honestly Afghanistan has always been overrun by a lot of empires like the Ghaznavids, Mughals, Timurids, Ghorids, Safavids, Afsharids, Ummayads, Seljuks, Abbassids and various others. Except 3 which are the British, Soviets and the Americans that were unsuccessful.

But the land is a pain in the ass to control. The whole place is full of hostile clans and tribes who dont give a shit about centralised rule or absolute rulers.

Seljuks even took Afghanistan but withdrew due to constant resistance to their rule.

Even if Secular Turkey tookover Afghanistan and imposed Sharia the Afghanis would find some excuse to rebel or fight.

 

[kumata]

Its about to tarnish Taliban's reputation
as worst as possible.

was not aware that they had a reputation LOL . U can't tarnish some thing which do not exist in first place!!!!!!!!!

 

[guest_07]

Assalamu'alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh to Muslim
& Good day to Others

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1426949490380967937

 

[Anastasius]

Its been something watching people online care more about women's rights in Afghanistan over 20 years of occupation and war crimes

While Afghanistan has been a mess, the US has been way less brutal than the Taliban has and will be. So yeah, women's rights is kinda relevant. I don't mean to disparage certain commenters here but please, please don't lower yourselves to the level of actually supporting these savages and belittling the suffering that people will undergo at their hands. ANA sucked, so does the Taliban. The Afghani people are the ones that are going to suffer and that includes women.

 

[Jackdaws]

Since you don't understand
my simple message,
I stop my conversation here.
Have a nice day.

Sure. Since you don't understand the question or choose not to, do what you must.

 

[Anastasius]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1427041653970280448

The US has laws against this and organizations dedicated to punishing crimes and upholding women's rights.

The Taliban doesn't even have such laws. A woman abused in Afghanistan now has nowhere to turn to.

Additionally, the US has almost 340 million people. Afghanistan has barely over 30 million.

So this tweet is nonsense and false equivalence.

 

[guest_07]

While Afghanistan has been a mess, the US has been way less brutal than the Taliban has and will be. So yeah, women's rights is kinda relevant. I don't mean to disparage certain commenters here but please, please don't lower yourselves to the level of actually supporting these savages and belittling the suffering that people will undergo at their hands. ANA sucked, so does the Taliban. The Afghani people are the ones that are going to suffer and that includes women.

Ok. US was less brutal.
Noted.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188280642884141057

 

[mulj]

Any link/source?

I think world on alert twitter source posted news about.

Edit.
Seems that is not confirmed and it might be that enclave is still out of the control of the talibans, so disregard my reply and lets say even for pr purposes that is some " new resistance" against talibans.

 

[mulj]

The US has laws against this and organizations dedicated to punishing crimes and upholding women's rights.

The Taliban doesn't even have such laws. A woman abused in Afghanistan now has nowhere to turn to.

Additionally, the US has almost 340 million people. Afghanistan has barely over 30 million.

So this tweet is nonsense and false equivalence.

Talibans have better laws to prevent such and do not forget that group was first one that gave shelter to the women raped by soviets while other abandoded them due cultural norms.

 

[trishna_amrta]

Well be Living in Prosperity

 

[Ryder]

I gotta better idea guys.

Make Afghanistan under Turkic rule again.

 

[Ryder]

Talibans have better laws to prevent such and do not forget that group was first one that gave shelter to the women raped by soviets while other abandoded them due cultural norms.

Im all for womens rights.

But lbgt rights HELL NO.

 

[mulj]

Im all for womens rights.

But lbgt rights HELL NO.

Of course i am also all for women rights but it is matter of frames under which one you "give" them rights.
Liberal secular frame "give" them right to be slave to the commercialism and constant sexualisation trough society lenses, along their already biological determimation i call it further burden, i do not call it liberation.