SavageKing456
Active member
Well the design goes against the claim of the hindu.Fake news from The Hindu is difficult to believe.
If you were wise,wouldn't bet so much on a trash newspaper though
Latest Thread
Well the design goes against the claim of the hindu.Fake news from The Hindu is difficult to believe.
That's a bit difficult, considering the nature of the accident, and the absence of any facilities for walking up to the boat and asking to look around. You do understand we are not talking about a scooter accident.Rather learn to do own research and believe in yourself .
Fake news from The Hindu is difficult to believe.
When asked, people still in service pursed their lips and refused to comment. There was no vehement denial.
No, that is not what I remember reading. The report only said that there was extensive damage caused by water coming in. It was my assumption that it was through a hatch, as it is difficult to understand how else water would get into a nuclear powered submarine.the hindu even said that the submarine was sunk
You are right. The hatch was my own extrapolation, and, in view of what people are saying, clearly not the case.The sub was damaged , there was some sort of breach , but not because someone left a hatch open .
Perhaps I am not wise. But then, I wouldn't bet too much on an unknown quantity like you either.Well the design goes against the claim of the hindu.
If you were wise,wouldn't bet so much on a trash newspaper though
Even then water simply cannot enter sub and damage arihant propulsion compartmentThe sub was damaged , *maybe* there was some sort of breach , but not because someone left a hatch open
But getting info on basic design of arihant sub from open sources , checking design of its russian counterpart used for design consultantion , applying your brain on why would authorities won't disclose details , either they are kept in dark too due to strategic nature of given system , it could have been kept out of service for integration of some system which wasn't added earlier , could be some communication system , or integration of newer missile system , could be anythingThat's a bit difficult, considering the nature of the accident, and the absence of any facilities for walking up to the boat and asking to look around. You do understand we are not talking about a scooter accident.
Don't bet on me eitherPerhaps I am not wise. But then, I wouldn't bet too much on an unknown quantity like you either.
Even then water simply cannot enter sub and damage arihant propulsion compartment
I understand.But getting info on basic design of arihant sub from open sources , checking design of its russian counterpart used for design consultantion , applying your brain on why would authorities won't disclose details , either they are kept in dark too due to strategic nature of given system , it could have been kept out of service for integration of some system which wasn't added earlier , could be some communication system , or integration of newer missile system , could be anything
I think we are agreed on that. It is a great consolation.Don't bet on me either
Never bet on anyone,independent research is the way.I think we are agreed on that. It is a great consolation.
If something had gone wrong then it would have been easily exposed through tenders issuedI understand.
Your approach is - nothing could have gone wrong, so it must have gone right, it must have been subterfuge.
Of course, the vessel was never made to undergo integration of some system that wasn't present earlier; never had anything done to its communications systems, and never earlier had integration of newer systems done to it. So on this occasion, instead of attending to things in a normal fashion, it was necessary to spin a story around it.
Makes perfect sense.
VERY impressive.Never bet on anyone,independent research is the way.
Now why didn't I think of that?If something had gone wrong then it would have been easily exposed through tenders issued
Surely but do you know , you need a bit of connection to read those tenders , any sensible person would know that you need key to open some encrypted documents unless you are hacker , and yeah status of Chinese programme can be traced by that , Pakistani programme are basically paint job. , Check for the order of green paint and quantity and you can track their progress .Now why didn't I think of that?
Anytime we need to know what's going wrong with Pakistani or Chinese programmes, all we need to do is to scan for tenders.
Goes without saying that the opposite applies, Our nuclear sub status is known at all times by the tenders that we issue for it.
The trouble is, with their extremely limited resources, with their shallow technology, they still manage to take sensible decisions, quickly, and they are ready. We are not. That is the essential difference, wisecracks about paint notwithstanding.Surely but do you know , you need a bit of connection to read those tenders , any sensible person would know that you need key to open some encrypted documents unless you are hacker , and yeah status of Chinese programme can be traced by that , Pakistani programme are basically paint job. , Check for the order of green paint and quantity and you can track their progress .
All I can say is that this once again underlines that Pak has 0 democratic cred. No PM ever serves out full term. There is always some kind of Armed Forces engineered coup.Interested members can use this thread to air out their thoughts w.r.t the unfolded/unfolding political situation in our neighbour Pakistan:
Imran Khan Has Been Bowled Out of Pakistan's Political Pitch. But What Does It Mean for India? - News18
Despite his surprise praise of India's foreign policy at the heels of his ouster, Imran Khan was considered to be more hawkish towards India, reports saidwww.news18.com
Please be courteous and professional as possible.
@crixus @Jackdaws @Paro @Peace Lover @Amardeep Mishra @Rajaraja Chola et al.